Integrity Training

Father Nathan Monk at Pensacola City Council

2011-12-29T20:15:00.000-05:00

The Roger Sherman Institute: Fundamentals of Economics

2011-12-08T13:50:00.002-05:00

Check out the facts and become an informed activist.

Course #97 - Fundamentals of Economics from Aaron Bolinger on Vimeo.

Up close and personal with George Knapp

2011-12-02T19:52:00.000-05:00

Who owns your home?

Thrive

2011-11-20T16:57:00.000-05:00

About global domination . . . A movie . . .

Sodom and Gomorrah revisited

2011-10-09T13:44:00.000-04:00

Why must the American people re-learn the lessons of history?

Here is an excerpt from Chapter 19 of the ancient Book of Jasher. In this account you will find that it was the decisions of "four judges" (not homosexuality) that gave a bad name to the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah.

31 And Paltith daughter of Lot went forth that day to fetch water, and she put bread into her pitcher of water, and she went to draw water by the poor man's place, and she took out the bread from the pitcher and gave it to the poor man and he ate it.

32 And the three men saw what Paltith did to the poor man, and they said to her, It is thou then who hast supported him, and therefore has he not starved, nor changed in appearance nor died like the rest.

33 And the three men went out of the place in which they were concealed, and they seized Paltith and the bread which was in the poor man's hand.

34 And they took Paltith and brought her before their judges, and they said to them, Thus did she do, and it is she who supplied the poor man with bread, therefore did he not die all this time; now therefore declare to us the punishment due to this woman for having transgressed our law.

35 And the people of Sodom and Gomorrah assembled and kindled a fire in the street of the city, and they took the woman and cast her into the fire and she was burned to ashes.

The Toronto 9/11 Hearings - 9/11/11

2011-09-13T08:41:00.000-04:00

Era of Love & Peace (man known as Vic Beck)

2011-09-02T21:45:00.002-04:00

More at: FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES and THE LETTER OF THE LAW.

How To Take Our Country Back (full video)

2011-08-29T11:17:00.000-04:00

Jury Power

2011-08-14T10:24:00.000-04:00

Total Proof of the New World Order

2011-08-05T21:24:00.000-04:00

YADA . . . Yada . . . yada . . .

2011-07-11T09:01:00.007-04:00

What was the "Original Sin"?

We seem to have forgotten that ALL law is contractual.

Even at the beginning, Yahweh Elohim gave contractual stipulations to the man, Adam, and the woman, Eve, in the care of their freehold.

Yahweh told them they could eat of the fruit of the trees with the exclusion of one.

When the serpent came around (consider the serpent as a feudal master, mafia Don, or Corporation sole) the serpent made an "offer", the Eve and Adam "accepted" the offer, and the fruit of the excluded tree (which, incidentally, did not belong to the serpent) was the "consideration" that sealed their contract.

In their "acceptance" of the serpent's contract our ancestors literally "sold the farm"!

HOWEVER; Since there is no longer "lawful" money - it's been debt-based since the mid to late 60s - and our "unalienable" economic and property Rights have been brokered into bond contracts ALL contracts, real and implied, have become "adhesive". Furthermore, ALL these contracts are "unconscionable" in that they require debt-based monetary consideration for which we are the surety. This is Peonage and peonage is illegal! Such unconscionable contracts include and are not limited to; birth-certificates, marriage and driver's licenses, real-estate transactions, and tithes and offerings . . . .

David said in Psalm 110 that there WILL be a remnant who volunteer when the time is right.

Could "NOW" be the time?

Isn't it time we stop contracting with the devil, a "corporation sole", and dissolve the authorities, commissions, etc. that are wasting the assets of our freehold and presuming their rulership over us?

Is it enough to say "Yada . . . yada . . . yada . . ." when these questions are raised?

For your consideration: An alternative cure for "dis-ease".

2011-06-18T12:27:00.000-04:00

"Sound Money" Economic Summit

2011-06-01T09:37:00.001-04:00

On Feb 7th and 8th, 2011, the South Carolina Sound Money Committee conducted an “Economics Summit” in Columbia. Presenters at this summit included; Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Dr. Larry Parks, Aaron Bolinger, and Geoff Turk.

The National Veterans Committee on Constitutional Affairs (NVCCA) assembled a collection of educational videos for members of the general public and state legislators to help them understand both the scope of the problem, and what our states can do to effect positive change. Although some of this material is “South Carolina specific,” the principles and concepts can be applied to any of our nation's union of 50 states.

Have a note pad handy – the subject matter contained is DEEP, including constitutional legal research.

Aaron Biblical Presentation 2 (912) from ethan graham on Vimeo.

Do the men and women of our nation enjoy "Human Rights" protections and defenses? If so, from whom?

2011-05-11T13:41:00.000-04:00

On May 10, 2011 Flavia Krause-Jackson of Bloomberg News posted to Bloomberg.com a report: U.S. Pushes China on Human Rights Record at the Risk of Upsetting ‘Friend’.

In the Bloomberg report Krause-Jackson quoted Vice President Joe Biden as saying:

" . . . the U.S. administration believes “strongly” that protecting human rights “is the best way to promote long-term stability and prosperity of any society.” "

So:

For what reason was "Disability Rights Protesters Arrested in DC" on May 2, 2011?

How is it that "the U.S. (28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)) administration" turns 'a blind eye' to the most blatant Human Rights abuse that is being perpetrated and perpetuated by the men and women within their own corporate jurisdiction?

Why was the following report not filed by an American reporter?

On Monday, May 9, 2011 Mike Kellerman, a Washington DC reporter with Iran's US edition of PressTV posted his video, Elder abuse, neglect rampant in US, and the following report titled:

They are a small but growing movement called the National Association to stop Guardian Abuse.

They say the disabled and elderly are Being prayed upon by the legal system, by crooked lawyers and courts Who they say scam millions of dollars by having older people declared Guardians of the courts depriving them and their families of their rights and taking their assets.

Protesting in front of the Justice Department, they met with a few members of Congress demanding something be done.

With millions Of baby boomers turning into senior citizens now, they're warning that Billions of dollars will be stolen from the elderly and their families By probate courts which they are claiming conspire with lawyers and state agencies like adult services to rob older people of their homes and Savings often declaring them without proper evidence, incompetent to handle their own financial affairs.

It's a big business they say, lawyers getting rich…

Its an assault on the elderly and their golden years says the group Citing case after case of the judicial system collaborating to put elderly Or disable people in a conservatorship status with the courts giving The lawyers and courts , without family having a say, complete control over an elderly person's life savings.

With the aging of the US population in record numbers over the next5 years, the baby boomers, they say that unless what they call a corrupt system is fixed, millions will be robbed of all they own by unscrupulous lawyers, social workers, corrupt probate courts, and the state agencies who are supposed to be protecting the elderly, not abusing them.

Are "Law Enforcers" and "Law makers" being manipulated by so called "investors" to statutiorly achieve their ultimate megalomaniacal authority over all peoples and nations?

Should the corporate United States and the State of Pennsylvania be dissolved?

2011-03-23T08:45:00.009-04:00

UNITED STATES CODE provides the legal definition of "State" and "United States" in 28USC3002:

(14) ``State'' means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.

(15) ``United States'' means--

          (A) a Federal corporation;

          (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or

          (C) an instrumentality of the United States.

On page 31 of "CURRENT EVENTS", the "Condensed Weekly Newspapers that were used by Teachers in Public and Private Schools" during the 1932 - 1933 school term indoctrinated future generations of Americans to accept a corporate business model of governance.

Because anything other than full disclosure of the nature of a contract is illegal, fraudulent and unethical; and the etiology of a corporate structure of governance had not been fully disclosed (see BUSINESS-AS-USUAL STRATEGIES FOR PROTECTING "THE CROWN" INVESTORS and their GLOBAL ANONYMITY) to its share and stock holders; and the acts of its directors and those in control have become illegal, oppressive and fraudulent; and, its assets have been misapplied and wasted, should not the corporation’s unhappy stock/shareholders have recourse to dissolution?

From 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1981:

(a) General rule.--Upon application filed by a shareholder or director of a business corporation, the court may entertain proceedings for the involuntary winding up and dissolution of the corporation when any one of the following is made to appear:

(1) The acts of the directors, or those in control of the corporation, are illegal, oppressive or fraudulent and that it is beneficial to the interests of the shareholders that the corporation be wound up and dissolved.

(2) The corporate assets are being misapplied or wasted and that it is beneficial to the interests of the shareholders that the corporation be wound up and dissolved.

(3) The directors are deadlocked in the direction of the management of the business and affairs of the corporation and the shareholders are unable to break the deadlock and that irreparable injury to the corporation is being suffered or is threatened by reason thereof. The court shall not appoint a receiver or grant other similar relief under this paragraph if the shareholders by agreement or otherwise have provided for the appointment of a provisional director or other means for the resolution of a deadlock but the court shall enforce the remedy so provided if appropriate.

Should the corporate United States and the State of Pennsylvania be dissolved? Here are examples of how some shareholders view the management of the business affairs of these 28 USC 3002 corporations.

REPUBLICANS

DEMOCRATS

Dumbing Down the Nation Through Education

2011-02-23T16:35:00.000-05:00

Jury found "kids for cash" judge Mark Ciavarella guilty of racketeering and conspiracy

2011-02-19T18:56:00.004-05:00

The defense and prosecution both declared victory after Mark A. Ciavarella Jr. was found guilty on 12 counts and acquitted of 27 Friday, but the former Luzerne County Juvenile Court judge, who would have spent less than seven years in prison under a plea agreement that collapsed in 2009, now faces 13 to 15 years.

A jury in U.S. District Court found Mr. Ciavarella guilty of racketeering and conspiracy for accepting $997,600 from wealthy developer Robert K. Mericle. Mr. Mericle testified he won a contract to build a for-profit juvenile detention center after a referral from Mr. Ciavarella. Read more:

"PERSON" POWER: WHO'S IN CONTROL?

2011-02-05T12:40:00.003-05:00

Regarding Unz & Co.

Unz & Co. has been setting the standard for compliance products and services since 1879. What is Unz & Company's relationship to the 28 USC 3002 (15) United States Corporation? What is Unz & Company's relationship to the 28 USC 3002 (14) State?

Some key terms from the Unz & Co. glossary are:

Harmonized System - Schedule of tariff nomenclature arranged in 6 digit codes allowing all participating countries to classify traded goods on a common basis. Beyond the 6 digit level, countries are free to introduce national distinctions for tariff or statistical purposes. This system will replace the Tariff Schedule of the United States (TSUS). The Harmonized System was implemented by the United States and other major GATT countries after Jan, 1. 1988. Additional countries are expected to be implementing the system subsequent to that date.

HTSUSA - Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the U.S. Annotated. The U.S. application of the Harmonized System for the classification of imported merchandise. The U.S. adheres to the international classification system to the six digit level and then adds four addition digits for rate of duty assignment and statistical purposes.

Marking (or marks) - Letters, numbers, and other symbols placed on cargo packages to facilitate identification.

Schedule B - Refers to Schedule B, Statistical Classification of Domestic and Foreign Commodities Exported from the United States . All commodities exported from the United States must be assigned a ten-digit Schedule B number. Note: the first 6 digits of the Schedule B number are harmonized.

Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) - Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), Department of the Treasury, implements and enforces financial and trade sanctions. FAC has the authority to include within the definition of the sanctioned government those individuals and entities that FAC has determined are owned by, controlled by, or acting directly or indirectly on behalf of the target government. Parties so identified are known as Specially Designated Nationals or SDNs. In practice, an SDN is a target government body, representative, intermediary, or front (whether overt or covert) that usually is located in a third country and functions as an extension of the sanctioned government. An SDN may also be a third-party company that otherwise becomes owned or controlled by the target government or that operates on its behalf. No criminal linkage is necessary. Ownership by, control by, acting on behalf of, or profiting from trade with the target government or country would suffice to qualify a person for designation.

Unz & Company's Mission Statement advises:

Our mission is to provide fully compliant, timely products and services to U.S. companies that are involved in international trade or the transportation of dangerous goods. We will be the most informed and informative company in our field, and make full compliance available to every company regardless of size, through training, systems, or forms.

Our value will be found in the knowledge that Unz & Co. will serve as your source for compliance expertise, allowing you to maintain your focus on your core business.

Therefore, given the above information, I ask:

What Form of Government has the United States? And,

Is there an undisclosed purpose for legislating government mandated identification?

You decide.

Have the American people been the unknowing victims of TREASONOUS FRAUD?

2011-01-30T14:29:00.003-05:00

How important is an Oath of Office?

Were you, or are you now, in the U.S. military? Were you told that the U.S. or State you served was defined under Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002 (14)(15)?

(14) “State” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.

(15) “United States” means—

(A) a Federal corporation;

(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or

If you believe you've been a victim of a seditious or treasonous fraud your remedy may be found in the verbage of Title 8 U.S.C. § 1481(b):

(b) Whenever the loss of United States nationality is put in issue in any action or proceeding commenced on or after September 26, 1961 under, or by virtue of, the provisions of this chapter or any other Act, the burden shall be upon the person or party claiming that such loss occurred, to establish such claim by a preponderance of the evidence. Any person who commits or performs, or who has committed or performed, any act of expatriation under the provisions of this chapter or any other Act shall be presumed to have done so voluntarily, but such presumption may be rebutted upon a showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the act or acts committed or performed were not done voluntarily.

What is you plan?

William Pawelec Interview

2011-01-22T21:23:00.001-05:00

About "False Flag" events.

2011-01-09T16:21:00.001-05:00

Treason, sedition, and subversive activities

2010-12-19T22:12:00.001-05:00

Are police officers of your local corporate municipality willing participants in a "seditious conspiracy" to overthrow our guaranteed "republican Form of government"?

The Bailout Money and Why You Dont have to Pay Your Mortgage 1/4

2010-11-14T16:05:00.001-05:00

Why aren't the Governors' of the several states protecting us from lies and theft?

2010-10-03T09:57:00.001-04:00

Perhaps a deliberated document in the nature of a 'Bill of Indictment' needs to be presented to the Governors of each of the several states. Then, maybe, the governors of the several states will do the right thing by and for the people and order their State's militia to execute justice on 'Wall Street fraudsters' who are operating in their State AND on treasonous judges who willingly protect the fraudsters and their own BAR associates' criminal enterprise.

BUSINESS-AS-USUAL STRATEGIES FOR PROTECTING "THE CROWN" INVESTORS and their GLOBAL ANONYMITY

2010-08-05T11:48:00.005-04:00

In the beginning "The Crown", a "corporation sole" established investment interests in the American colonies.

Origins - The concept of the Crown took form under the feudal system, evolving from and synthesising oriental and barbarian concepts of kingship. Under the feudal system, in England and (separately) Scotland, all rights and privileges were ultimately granted by the ruler (though this was not the case in all countries that had this system). All land was granted by the Crown to lords, in exchange for feudal services, and they in turn granted the land to lesser lords. One exception to this was common socage—owners of land held as socage held it subject only to the Crown. The Crown as ultimate owner of all property also owns any property which has become bona vacantia.

When a relative few of the early colonist declared their independence, the investors didn't argue, the investors compromised. The investors put their hirelings in places whereby they could promulgate and enact the laws upon which their statutorily established courts would act (see History 1450-1789: Navigation Acts). The following is an example of how corporate governance would be "statutorily" erected as a "Crown Entity" within a commonwealth (or anyplace within these united states of America "by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress" - see Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution). The example that follows shows that corporate governance was erected in the capitol city of Kingston, Jamaica, in 1803.

The erection of a corporate UNITED STATES (see: U.S.C. Title 28 § 3002 (15) “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the United States) and all its appellations therefrom appears to have started with the incorporation of Philadelphia on March 11, 1789 (Recorded L. B. No. 3, p. 455 See the Acts of Assembly passed December 9, 1789, Chapter 1479; April 2, 1790, Chapter 1509; March 8, 1792, Chapter 1665; April 19, 1794, Chapter 1754; April 4, 1796, Chapter 1905; April 11, 1799, Chapter 2091; March 3, 1800, Chapter 2117) and further confirmed by the "Gettysburg Address in 1864, and the Incorporation of District of Columbia by (Presidential) Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, under the Emergency War Powers Act and the Reconstruction Acts" (reorganized June 11, 1878 --16 Stat. 419 Chapter 62).

"The Crown" has its Treasury", and "The Treasury" has its agenda for stakeholders in "Crown Entities".

What is a Crown Entity? - Crown entities are bodies established by law in which the Government has a controlling interest - for example, by owning a majority of the voting shares or through having the power to appoint and replace a majority of the governing members - but which are legally separate from the Crown.
Section 7 of the Crown Entities Act 2004 outlines the five categories of Crown entity:
Statutory entities - bodies corporate established through legislation;
Crown entity companies - often previously known as Crown-owned companies;
Crown entity subsidiaries - companies that are controlled by Crown entities;
School boards of trustees - as constituted under the Education Act 1989; and
Tertiary education institutes - polytechnics, universities and wananga.

Treasury hirelings develop rhetoric and protocol to assure the success of their global agenda.

Corporate Social Responsibility: Dealing With Political Exposure

View more presentations from Competitive enterprise Institute.

(Who is Competitive Enterprise?

Location: Washington, United States
Work: Policy Research Organization at Competitive Enterprise Institute
About: CEI is a non-profit public policy organization dedicated to advancing the principles of free enterprise and limited government. )

So, if the agenda of "The Crown" and its "Treasury" is to protect and defend the financial interests and statutory schemes of its proprietary investors,

then who is representing our interests?

Who do we, the people, turn to to defend and protect our interests and investments?

See also:

The U.S. Constitution, Article 1 § 8, Clause 4. The Congress shall have Power * * * To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States - NATURALIZATION AND CITIZENSHIP, and

A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates, 1774 - 1875

Is "legislator" doublespeak for "broker"?

2010-08-02T19:59:00.001-04:00

Are the children of our nation born free? Or, have Democrat and Republican Legislators brokered them into debt servitude to an oligarchy of global bankers and investors?

http://www.cspan.org/

June 23, 2010 - 1:15

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/29 ... hr 3:00 -

Canadian Rob Menard Explains "REMITTANCE"

2010-07-10T12:56:00.001-04:00

At http://www.answers.com/ Remittance is defined in various Dictionaries and Encyclopedia. From that website, on this date, the following text is how "remittance" is defined. As you watch Menard's video, keep in mind that the billing agency may never fully disclose that to 'remove an obligation' there are other lawful choices. I have embolden in blue (and it shows in purple) those choices.

Investment: The process of sending money to remove an obligation. This is most often done through an electronic network, wire transfer or mail. The term also refers to the amount of money being sent to remove the obligation.

Investopedia Says:

When a person sends a check to the government to pay for a tax bill, the check is remittance to remove the tax obligation. If you were to send money to a friend in Europe through a wire-transfer service, the sum of the payment is the remittance.

Banking: 1. Payment toward satisfaction of a debt, whether in cash or cash equivalents, such as checks, drafts, and other negotiable instruments.

2. Payment on an installment loan or open-end credit account, forwarded through the mail to a Lock Box along with a remittance document, a machine readable billing document encoded with the customer's account number, and the amount due, plus any late charges, if the loan payment is delinquent.

3. Proceeds from a check submitted to another bank for Collection.

Law Encylcopedia: Money sent from one individual to another in the form of cash, check, or some other manner.

Financial statements sent by a creditor to a debtor frequently refer to the process of submitting a monthly remittance.

See The World Freeman Society for common sense tips as to how you can demand 'honest services' from your government and its employees.

Anything less than 'honest service' is unethical and a breach of fiduciary duty on their part (and ours).

WHAT IS "INTEGRITY"?

2010-06-28T11:17:00.000-04:00

"What's wrong with this picture?"

2010-06-22T17:02:00.000-04:00

How is it that a "federal judge" would determine "that Hispanics were being treated unfairly" and allow them "to flip the lever six times for one (presumably Democrat or Republican Party) candidate", while Minor Party and Independent Candidate Constitutional Lawsuits are Pending in 21 States just to obtain ballot access?

What can be done?

Voters in Fremont, Nebraska found a solution. They put the illegal immigration issue on their ballot.

World Economies: The Next Step

2010-06-05T12:58:00.004-04:00

Here's a spoof on the truth of the matter:

So what is the next step?

Consider this April 19, 1937 article about how bonds are monetized.

Then watch Dominique Strauss-Kahn as he describes IMF plans to monetize "bonds" in IMF currency to attendees at the National Press Club on April 16, 2009. This segment is at +/- 00:33:00 of the video.

"TERRORISM": Who benefits?

2010-05-16T09:26:00.010-04:00

How is it that employees of the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue can make terroristic threats on their employers (i.e., Pennsylvania property owners) with impunity?

Have you ever thought about why dis-ease has become so prevelant in our united states?

Do you know how the FBI defines Organized Crime, Criminal Enterprise and Racketeering?

How do you respond to threats?

How do you suppose those who have been benefiting from your belief in their fear (False Evidence Appearing Real) tactics will respond when they realize that you know their name and where to find them?

What will be their individual and collective "defense mechanism"?

What will be yours?

Dictionary definition: Defense Mechanism

1. Biology. A physiological reaction of an organism used in self-protection, as against infection.

2. Psychology. Any of various usually unconscious mental processes, including denial, projection, rationalization, and repression, that protect the ego from shame, anxiety, conflict, loss of self-esteem, or other unacceptable feelings or thoughts.

Do you believe "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's GOD" to which you're entitled by the "Declaration of Independence" are there for your benefit?

Do you feel good about your self?

Do you feel good about others?

Are you able - and willing - to meet the demands of life?

What will you choose to do?

How will you choose to use the talent(s) with which you were endowed?

Join with The Articles of Freedom Liberty Coalition?

Volunteer to Preserve the American Dream?

Where there is no guidance the people fall, But in abundance of counselors there is victory.

ARTICLES OF FREEDOM

2010-04-18T12:20:00.002-04:00

CONSTITUTIONALLY AUTHORIZED CENSUS TAKING

2010-03-21T12:56:00.000-04:00

The SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; PONZI, TONTINE or LAWFUL INVESTMENT?

2010-03-16T14:45:00.014-04:00

In 1932 school aged Americans learned about "The Magic Scrap of Paper" and their responsibilities as "stockholders" in what they perceived to be their lawful, constitutionally defined, Government.

However, since 1932 much has changed. "Lawful Money" is no longer lawful, and since 1994 the Social Security Administration has been operating as a wholly independent agency.

So, what type of financial system had Democrat and Republican representatives during President Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration given the American people?

A Ponzi system?

A Tontine system?

A system of lawful investments?

In the April 19, 1937 issue of The Scranton Times (archives, page 16) was the following article that explains the issuance of "bonds":

FEDERAL RESERVE HIT IN TALK BY LAMNECK

Washington, April 19 - Representative Lamneck (D Ohio) told the house today the federal reserve system is committing legally "the greatest burglary in history."

Critizing the system in the midst of a plea that the budget be balanced to avert "calamity," the Ohioan said that for a $300 investment a bank could get a $30,000 return."

If a burglar had a license to steal, he said, "he would at least have to carry away his loot. The federal reserve system has its loot brought to it."Lamneck said this was a procedure for a "steal" authorized by congress.

The treasury asks bids for several million dollars worth of bonds. A banker says he will take a million dollars worth and credits the treasury on his books with a million dollars.

Then he deposits the bonds with a federal reserve agent as collateral security for a million dollars in federal reserve notes and agrees to pay the cost of printing the currency - about $300.

He now has a million dollars in currency to balance the million dollar deposit he credited to the treasury.

He still owns the bonds and can collect the interest, about $20,000 a year on an investment of $300.

Further, in April 2009, speaking before the National Press Club in Washington D.C., here's what Dominique Strauss-Kahn said as he spoke on behalf of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). In his talk, Mr. Strauss-Kahn responded to questions from the audience. Of particular interest to all Americans (in my opinion) is his offer, just past the 33 minute point of his talk, " . . . OF BONDS WHICH WILL BE BONDS IN THE IMF CURRENCY . . . .

If you take the time to watch Dominique Strauss-Kahn's entire 'question and answer' session (from about the 30 minute point on) you may begin to understand why, in 1782, under the Articles of Confederation, Pennsylvania legislators promulgated "an ACT to prevent the erecting any new and independent state within the limits of this commonwealth".

What do you think?

Has the United States been re-venued into 'the crown's' feudalistic system of governance by an oligarchy of plutocrats using Ponzi and Tontine investment schemes?

If it has, is this "Ok" with you? Is this what you want for your descendents?

It's up to every American to decide on an honorable method of investing in the future of our nation and to make the necessary changes as they are willing and able.

On Haiti

2010-01-16T16:22:00.036-05:00

For food, clothing and shelter, will Haitians contract themselves; their lives, property and happiness into an unescapable condition of debt servitude to the men and women who comprise the oligarchy that sets in motion the policies for the World Bank and the IMF (International Monetary Fund)?

Wouldn't the best way to help Haiti be to simply assist Hatians in rebuilding their physical infrastructure - then leave them alone to develop their own economy? Yet, ex-presidents Clinton and Bush are, on behalf of the United Nations, requesting U.S. aid in "cash"; i.e., 'money'; a unit of currency that cost the Federal Reserve pennies, on any denomination of dollar ($1, $5, $10, $20, $50 or $100), to produce.

It appears (to me) that this catastrophic earthquake may be the catalyst the global 'money changers' have been waiting for. With this event Dominique Strauss-Kahn and his cronies, with the help of Bill Clinton and the George Bushes, can advance their global dominion through a one world currency.

Dominique Strauss-Kahn seems to have positioned the IMF to occupy Haiti and enslave the Hatians to a developing debt based monetary system under China's dominion. In fact China may have already 'staked their claim' on Haiti under the "Law of the Flag" by immediately positioning their flag in a conspicuous manner that seemed to have gone un-noticed to most of the world except for Associated Press researcher Henry Hou in Beijing and CBSNEWS.

Flag incidents were cause for concern between Iraq and Iran on (or about) December 19, 2009; and, in March 2003, in a post to Independent Online; "UK 'concerned' about American flag-raising", a British Lieutenant Colonel was quoted as saying, "We go to liberate, not to conquer", presumably implying that American soldiers had been sent to conquer Iraq under the American flag.

So who will profit from this Haitian disaster?

Consider this April 19, 1936 article about how bonds are monetized.

Then watch Dominique Strauss-Kahn as he describes IMF plans to attendees at the National Press Club on April 16, 2009. You can click the box for the transcript and either scroll to 00:33:21 or search for the word "BONDS" to begin reading.

To know how IMF plans are currently being implemented in Haiti see IMF to increase Haiti loan by $100 million; "The emergency financing would be provided as an augmentation to the existing IMF-supported arrangement with Haiti," IMF Managing Director Dominique ... , Material about Haiti and its activities with the IMF, and IMF Survey: Haiti Gets $36 Million in New IMF Financing The IMF's Executive Board has approved a $36.6 million ..., and Haiti Begins Participation in the IMF's General Data Dissemination System.

And, finally, consider that there are 'inner circle' people like Chelsea Clinton, who in 2008 worked for a New York-based hedge fund.

Has the United States been re-venued into 'the crown's' feudalistic system of governance?

2010-01-06T20:57:00.003-05:00

Lack of meaningful work and loss of property causes stress. And, long term stress can lead to serious health problems.

So; What form of government has the United States?

And, what is "the crown"?

(For a prophetic perspective on this subject, see also Isaiah 28 and, consider from Strong's Hebrew Dictionary, the double meaning of "crown".)

Pleze Br'er Fox don't throw me in the Briar Patch

2009-12-27T10:25:00.009-05:00

This is what investors told members of Congress they wanted to do:

This is what members of Congress did for investors:

Said Br'er Rabbit (the Investors) to Br'er Fox (the Senate) as Br'er Bear (the House) stood by;

"Pleze Br'er Fox, don't throw me in the briar patch."

Then Br'er Fox (the Senators) and Br'er Bear (the Representatives), in their perfunctory dysfunctional manner, resolve their differences by negotiation.

Government "Plan" or Banker's "Scam"? You decide.

2009-11-21T11:51:00.007-05:00

Below is a message about the government’s “cash for clunkers” scam. I received this message from a friend of an anonymous friend. As you follow the math, keep in mind the following facts:

It cost the owners of the Federal Reserve approximately $.07 to print a "bill" of any denomination.

When a worker receives $10.00 for his/her labor the owners of the Federal Reserve profit approximately $9.93!

Another +/- $2.00 (20%) Federal Tax is demanded by agents of the IRS on behalf of the owners of the Federal Reserve.

Therefore, with the present use of "bills", for each $10.00 of a working man's labor his debt to the owners of the Federal Reserve is approximately $11.93.

Should laborers acquiesce by chip or plastic card to a totally cashless economy, profits for the owners of the Federal Reserve will increase exponentially - approximately $12.00 for every $10.00 of a man's labor!

Today we are at the threshold of an optimal form of indebted servitude, reminiscent of the feudal system from whence we came wherein none who opposes it will be able to buy or sell.

The message:

Surely this could not be true?

"You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time." . . . Abraham Lincoln

Good Morning all Tax Payers:

The Plan, The Scam, The Man, Don't ya just love it when a plan comes together?

The Scam

Here is what a learned friend had to say about my Democratic Math e-mail. It's even worse apparently than I first thought:

It's way worse than that. Ignore all the gas crap and just look at how the stupid car buyer got taken to the cleaners:

If you traded in a clunker worth $3500, you get $4500 off for an apparent "savings" of $1000.

However, you have to pay taxes on the $4500 come April 15th (something that no auto dealer will tell you). If you are in the 30% tax bracket, you will pay $1350 on that $4500.

So, rather than save $1000, you actually pay an extra $350 to the feds. In addition, you traded in a car that was most likely paid for. Now you have 4 or 5 years of payments on a car that you did not need, that was costing you less to run than the payments that you will now be making.

But wait; it gets even better: you also got ripped off by the dealer. For example, every dealer here in LA was selling the Ford Focus with all the goodies, including A/C, auto transmission, power windows, etc for $12,500 the month before the "cash for clunkers" program started.

When "cash for clunkers" came along, they stopped discounting them and instead sold them at the list price of $15,500. So, you paid $3000 more than you would have the month before... (Honda, Toyota , and Kia played the same list price game that Ford and Chevy did).

So let's do the final tally here:

You traded in a car worth: . . . $3500
You got a discount of: . . . . . . . $4500
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . --------
so far . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +$1000
But you have to pay: $1350 in taxes on the $4500
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . --------
Net so far: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -$350
And you paid: $3000 more than the car was selling for the month before
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---------
Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -$3350

We could also add in the additional taxes (sales tax, state tax, etc.) on the extra $3000 that you paid for the car, along with the 5 years of interest on the car loan, but let's just stop here.

So who actually made out on the deal? The feds collected taxes on the car along with taxes on the $4500 they "gave" you. The car dealers made an extra $3000 or more on every car they sold along with the kickbacks from the manufacturers and the loan companies. The manufacturers got to dump lots of cars they could not give away the month before. And the poor, stupid consumer got saddled with even more debt that they cannot afford.

Obama and his band of merry men convinced Joe consumer that he was getting $4500 in "free" money from the "government" when in fact, Joe was giving away his $3500 car and paying an additional $3350 for the privilege.

Think this was stupid for those who were crazy enough to swallow this wonderful scheme?

Just wait until we get health care with no additional costs over what most of us now pay for health insurance and the best medical care in the world. Think that scheme might be designed by the same people who came up with Cash for Clunkers?

You decide.

DOES THE U.S. HAVE A SYSTEM OF FEUDAL COURTS?

2009-11-11T10:47:00.003-05:00

You decide.

The following from Deconstructing America: The Movie exposes some of the systemic pathology within the American courts.

On "Immunity"

2009-10-28T08:33:00.005-04:00

Bob Hurt's research on "Immunity" has been moved to http://heros-heroines.blogspot.com/2009/11/blog-post.html.

What happened with the "bailout" money?

2009-10-23T20:08:00.003-04:00

University of Ottawa Professor, Michel Chossudovsky, explains what's happening with the "bailout" money.

William Shatner's video message includes lessons about Truth, Integrity and Control of Guns

2009-10-18T11:57:00.004-04:00

More lessons are below.

MAKE MINE FREEDOM (1948)

2009-10-06T20:59:00.001-04:00

LACKAWANNA BAR FOUNDATION

2009-10-05T09:21:00.009-04:00

You know as well as I, that it is the members of the Bar who promulgate legislation on behalf of corporate entities; and, once passed by legislators, it is upon that legislation that the courts must act. So, now that the Lackawanna Bar Association has formed their 501(c)3 charitable Foundation (to promote youth justice education and ensure access to the law for Pennsylvania's most vulnerable), does it mean that individual Bar members will be legally able to conspire to retaliate against Notaries and Mediators who tap into their profits by resolving conflicts before they escalate unto litigation?

In compliance with Title 22 § 501, will pettifogging Lackawanna County Bar members now be able to appoint their own Detectives and Private Police to assure job security by harrassment and intimidation of Notaries and Mediators through a pseudo-beneficent NGO?

Title 22 § 501 reads (in part): Appointment by nonprofit corporations.

(a) Appointment authorized.--Any nonprofit corporation, as defined in 15 Pa.C.S. Pt. II Subpt. C (relating to nonprofit corporations) maintaining a cemetery or any buildings or grounds open to the public, or organized for the prevention of cruelty to children or aged persons, or one or more of such purposes, may apply to the court of common pleas of the county of the registered office of the corporation for the appointment of such persons as the corporation may designate to act as policemen for the corporation. The court, upon such application, may by order appoint such persons, or as many of them as it may deem proper and necessary, to be such policemen.

And, since it is "the court of common pleas of the county of the registered office of the corporation" that is applied to "for the appointment of such persons as the corporation may designate to act as policemen for the corporation" - and the "Clerk of the Courts" for Lackawanna County is reported to be in New York - in which jurisdiction will their appointments be filed? Pennsylvania or New York?

Has there been a legal coup of our lawful constitutional form of government by Title 53 and Title 64 NGO's? And;

If so, why are the men and women of our state and nation still being led to believe that they live in a "free country" where the "rule of LAW" reigns supreme? And;

Without a bona fide constitutional system of justice, how will these corporate entities be made to compensate the men and women who have been feloniously robbed of their property and wealth, detained without warrant, and imprisoned under the "color of law" of their Bar members' seditious (criminal) enterprise?

Perhaps we need to review history. Perhaps we can begin with lessons from the "Reign of Terror" while we contemplate what it means to have a 501c.3 PENNSYLVANIA STATE TROOPERS ASSOCIATION, a nonprofit "Foundation to Support the men and women of the Law Enforcement Community", that can legally appoint their own private police force.

Is there no judge in Pennsylvania who has character and presence of mind equal in caliber to that of Ashtabula County Common Pleas Court Judge, Alfred Mackey?

CONTINENTAL CONGRESS ELECTIONS WERE OCTOBER 10th 2009

2009-10-01T10:07:00.004-04:00

The Continental Congress will convene on November 8, 2009.

MAYORS AGAINST ILLEGAL GUNS (MAIG)

2009-09-24T07:52:00.012-04:00

The following is a Letter to the Editor in response to a 'Guest Commentary' - "Mayors Against (Illegal) Guns" by Carbondale Mayor Justin Taylor. Here's how that commentary appeared in the Opinion section of the Carbondale News on 9-23-2009.

To the Editor;

Who gave Mayor Taylor the jurisdictional authority to "assume" that "(A)nyone who continues to oppose" his "membership in the "Mayors Against Illegal Guns" . . . is in favor of illegal guns"?

If Mayor Taylor supports "all Second Amendment rights provided to law-abiding citizens," what has persuaded him to deny First Amendment Rights (inclusive of "redress") to those same "law-abiding citizens"? Did not Mayor Taylor take the correct oath of office? The one provided in the Constitution of Pennsylvania; Article VI, Section 3?

And, if he did take the correct oath, why (by his own words) does he appear to be seditiously colluding with other mayors to overthrow the underpinnings of our "guaranteed" constitutional (U.S. Constitution Article 4, Section 4) "republic"?

In the CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA, under Article I, DECLARATION OF RIGHTS it states;

"That the general, great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and unalterably established, WE DECLARE THAT - . . . The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned." (Article I, Section 21.)

So why is Mayor Taylor telling the people that he opposes "federal legislation that would override existing state laws . . . ", yet be in favor illegal gun laws; the illegality of which is determined by questions on a federal form that were promulgated by federal mandates and NOT supporting the full intent of the law as "unalterably established" in Article 1, Section 21 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania; the Constitution for which he is ASSUMED to have pledged his oath of office?

* * * * * * * * * * * *

See also WHERE HAS THE CORPORATE UNITED STATES HIDDEN ITS STATE'S SECRET?

The people of Carbondale, and those who are in positions of authority in all municipal and quasi-municipal jurisdictions in Lackawanna County, have a "Right to Know" that the "Clerk of the Courts" for Lackawanna County is in New York.

If the people who litigate, adjudicate and govern in Lackawanna County know that they are willfully participating in seditious, or criminal activities, why haven't they been investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and prosecuted by the Department of Justice (DOJ)?

What is prohibiting full disclosure of the adhesive and unconscionable nature of the the "tax" contracts by which people have had their "corporeal" and "incorporeal" property seized for noncompliance and benign "redress"?

How is it that men like Carbondale Mayor Justin Taylor will choose to serve a system of governance that appears to be based on fraud?

Is it the fictional NGO "ACORN" or is it prominent legislative and judicial family members who influence a matrix of corruption in Pa government?

2009-09-19T11:17:00.012-04:00

Here's another way of looking at Senator Casey's support of ACORN and his influence in the matrix of judicial corruption in Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania. (Updated 10/19/2009)

Click on http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202423950217 to link to the August 21, 2008 Pa. Courts Pursuing Conciliation for Foreclosures post by Amaris Elliott-Engel at Pennsylvania Law Weekly to see how the legislative Casey and judicial Munley families continue to promulgate influence and legislation in order to adjudicate protections and defenses for owners of global banks and the controversial Non-Governmental Organization, ACORN.

In Lackawanna County, since - at least - the time Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “New Deal”, it seems to have been a common practice for these prominent families (i.e., the legislative Casey and the judicial Munley) to collude in seditious activities that broker the men and women of our nation into Thirteenth Amendment 're-constructed' statutory “servitude” to a corporate jurisdiction. Their backroom dealings have been without “full disclosure” of the adhesive and unconscionable natures of what I consider to be treasonous contracts that have allowed a statutory governance to be erected within the parameters of our intended form of government.

One example of how this contractual 'revenuing' (no pun intended) into a foreign corporate jurisdiction is being done, had been previously posted. In that example I ask: "BONDS": Are they UNCONSCIONABLE, IN VIOLATION of RICO STATUTES, or TREASON? and give an example of how we, American men and women who believe our selves to be free, have been "ceded" by legislative brokers into a type of corporate feudalism under what appears to be the same "Crown" business-as-usual enterprise system of governance that colonized the "new world" in the 17th Century on behalf of its investors.

So, again I bring your attention to Harrisburg Bureau Chief, Robert Swift’s December 3, 2008 article wherein he quotes Pennsylvania Majority Leader Todd Eachus, D-116 as saying; “Integrity is built in the DNA of the Casey family” and ask you, the reader to look past the wordsmiths’ rhetoric and decide for your self whether “integrity” can be for good or for evil.

Check out the facts and become an informed electorate.

AGENDA 21, ECOSYSTEMS, HEALTH-CARE and the INSURANCE INDUSTRY

2009-09-08T18:49:00.029-04:00

Is there a connection between the U.N.'s AGENDA 21 programmes and projects for ECOSYSTEMS, "PUBLIC OPTION" HEALTH-CARE, and INSURANCE INDUSTRY "stakeholders"?

In this age of "corporate governance" where ALL law is contingent on what we, the people, allow via our contract with our representatives to this government I present to you the information we're being given to understand the connections between the United Nation's AGENDA 21 'programmes and projects' for ECOSYSTEMS, "PUBLIC OPTION" HEALTH-CARE and INSURANCE INDUSTRY "stakeholders".

"FULL disclosure" MUST be demanded of our legislators! Help them to perform their tasks and duties with the integrity you expect from them.

Consider the following and share your thoughts with your legislators. Help them to frame their questions to lobbyists who are pushing a global agenda for an oligarchy of plutocrats.

"Stakeholder" "Ownership and sustainability" is being encouraged by the World Health Organization through:

Strategic Planning and Innovation - " . . . SPI aims to increase combined coverage of services for TB, HIV/AIDS and malaria. It encourages ownership and sustainability of these services, and strives to help countries produce practical methods to deliver prevention and care for the three diseases."

And,

Ecosystems and health - There is growing concern amongst many natural scientists that human interventions are altering the capacity of ecosystems to provide their goods (e.g. freshwater, food, pharmaceutical products, etc) and services (e.g. purification of air, water, soil, sequestration of pollutants, etc).And, "special interest" lobbyist's for Wall Street investors and bankers are now gearing up to "securitize" "life settlement" policies "by packaging hundreds or thousands together into bonds. They will then resell those bonds to investors, like big pension funds, who will receive the payouts when people with the insurance die. The earlier the policyholder dies, the bigger the return . . . " (The rest of the article is below: Wall St. now investing in death.)

Consider how the bankers "plan to buy "life settlements," . . . "securitize" these policies, . . . (and) by packaging hundreds or thousands together into bonds . . . (t)hey will then resell those bonds to investors, . . . who will receive the payouts when people with the insurance die. . . . The earlier the policyholder dies, the bigger the return . . . " as you watch IMF Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn speak on new flexible lending programs - and other efforts - the International Monetary Fund (IMF) will use to help countries through the recession. Hear Mr. Strauss-Kahn for your self as he responded to questions from the audience. Pay particular attention to Strauss-Kahn's offer ". . . OF BONDS WHICH WILL BE BONDS IN THE IMF CURRENCY . . ." Strauss-Kahn's statements are just past the 33 minute point of his April 2009 talk before the National Press Club in Washington, DC.

If we, the people, believe what we are told - that We, the people, are the government - and understand how these seditious activities are usurping our authority to govern our selves, then all members of Congress and our state legislators require our oversight.

Let your representative know what you know so that he (also she) will know that you know that he knows!

Quit giving your 'law-makers' "wiggle-room" to pass treasonous "bills of attainder" for a foreign oligarchy that mandates you either willingly participate in their constructive fraud or be duly convicted of their statutory crime(s) and be jailed!

In the article (below) "Health care top issue as Congress returns" are some of the issues before Congress as they craft a comprehensive health care plan. Included in that article are some concerns that have been voiced by Catholic bishops.

And, because ALL LAW IS CONTRACTUAL under the 13th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, if you - a "U.S. citizen" - choose not to 'voluntarily' comply with federally legislated mandates for your health care (unless you speak-up NOW) you may be 'duly convicted of a crime'.

So, here's one more message on healthcare.

Congress requires our oversight.

2009-09-01T10:17:00.001-04:00

Congressmen (like Mike Rogers) need our support.

So: What's the next step for a free people?

- Reaffirm your allegiance to the organic principles of our constitutional republic.

- Become involved in the October 10, 2009 election process to elect delegates to the November 9 - 22 Continental Congress of 2009.

- Learn more about the Continental Congress 2009 at http://www.cc2009.us/about-cc2009.

Submission #65632 to the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Philadelphia

2009-08-13T14:19:00.002-04:00

Please investigate whether a criminal conspiracy involving "Impersonation/Identity Fraud" and "Advance Fee Scheme(s)" have been perpetrated (and continues to be perpetuated) by members of the Pennsylvania Bar Association in the "County of Lackawanna" and/or "Lackawanna County" and The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania and/or the Pennsylvania Unified Judicial System. For your convenience I have put what I believe to be substantive evidence onto the following blogs: Integrity Training and The Truth Store.

BY WHAT MANNER HAS A STATE WITHIN A STATE BEEN ERECTED?

2009-07-12T18:01:00.003-04:00

Read on . . .

WHERE HAS THE CORPORATE UNITED STATES HIDDEN ITS STATE'S SECRET?

2009-06-27T08:58:00.020-04:00

Think of the plight of our nation and the integrity of our courts like this:

Just as all good "co-dependents" in a "dysfunctional" family will protect the "family secret"; so will those with "privilege" (lawyers, judges, politicians, media, etc.) in a dysfunctional nation protect their "state secrets" by promulgating the laws that their corporate "Law Enforcers" will enforce and upon which their courts will adjudicate.

Alcoholics hide their "booze";

Drug Addicts hide their "stash";

Power mongers hide their "corporations". (See page 185 of the History: the First national bank of Scranton, Pa.)

Hirelings promulgate and pass laws that protect the privacy of "criminal enterprises" and activities for a paycheck;

And, according to Governor Rendell's Right to Know Officer, hide the location for their constitutionally "foreign" court in another State. Read it for your self. The "Clerk of the Courts for Lackawanna County" Pennsylvania is in the City of Lackawanna, New York.

TAXATION IN PENNSYLVANIA in 1896

2009-05-15T20:48:00.017-04:00

The following pages on "Taxation" are from the 1896 book FIRST LESSONS IN CIVIL GOVERNMENT. Notice the last sentence under the heading "The County Collects Money for the State" (page 90); "Real estate is not taxed for state purposes."

For the definition of Real Estate in Pennsylvania, go to the Pennsylvania Code 35.201, "Definitions":

Real estate—An interest or estate in land-whether corporeal or incorporeal, whether freehold or nonfreehold, whether the land is situated in this Commonwealth or elsewhere—including leasehold interests and time share and similarly designated interests.

And, for further elaboration on what comprises an "estate" see page 1 of the 1892 book, The Theory and Practice of Banking.

Are your County Commissioners brokering the fruits of your labor for IMF currency?

2009-04-17T21:19:00.014-04:00

Watch Dominique Strauss-Kahn as he speaks on new flexible lending programs and other efforts the International Monetary Fund (IMF) will use to help low-income countries through the deepest post-war recession. Mr. Strauss-Kahn also responded to questions from the audience. Of particular interest to me was his offer " . . . OF BONDS WHICH WILL BE BONDS IN THE IMF CURRENCY . . . just past the 33 minute point of his talk.

If you choose to watch the question and answer session from the 30 minute point you may understand why, in 1782, under the Articles of Confederation, Pennsylvania legislators promulgated "an ACT to prevent the erecting any new and independent state within the limits of this commonwealth".

WHO IS PROTECTING AND DEFENDING THE HOMELAND?

2009-04-12T09:56:00.014-04:00

What is Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and this administration doing about the 'inland' "scourge of piracy" and the capture of American flags and Citizens in their own 'homeland'?

The following April 8, 2009 video will show Mrs. Clinton (at the 1:50 mark) laugh as she addresses the Somali piracy situation during a 2+ minute news conference with Moroccan Foreign Minister Dr. Taieb Fassi Fihri.

With whom is Mrs. Clinton working "together to end this kind of criminal activity (piracy) anywhere on the high seas"?

Why is Mrs. Clinton laughing? Is it because she has been hired to support and defend other kinds of criminal activity that include legalized piracy and hostage taking within a system of governance that has established "a state within a state" through coded legislation and a "unified judiciary"?

Here is the text excerpt from this video.

QUESTION: Madame Secretary, do you have any clarity on the Somali piracy situation?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, we’re deeply concerned and we’re following it very closely. Specifically, we are now focused on this particular act of piracy and the seizure of a ship that carries 21 American citizens. More generally, we think the world must come together to end the scourge of piracy.

I think Morocco was the very first country that recognized us, going back a long time. And we worked together to end piracy off of the coast of Morocco all those years ago, and we’re going to work together to end this kind of criminal activity anywhere on the high seas. Thank you.

A CRASH COURSE IN CAPITAL MARKETS

2009-04-07T18:58:00.006-04:00

Watch The Dark Side of the Looking Glass.

The narrator uses approximately 100 slides in his presentation to show how the capital markets became - and remain - corrupted. It's approximately one hour from start to finish, and, in my opinion, watching it was time well spent.

Demonstrate Integrity

2009-04-06T11:53:00.001-04:00

Check for timely updates at Freedom.TV.

Why did ranking members of Congress refuse to heed the economic warnings?

2009-04-06T11:34:00.007-04:00

An 11 minute lesson about different forms of government.

2009-03-21T20:44:00.002-04:00

Economist, Michael Hudson

2009-03-08T21:37:00.003-04:00

Michael Hudson cites the Biblical Jubilee law as a solution to the
economic problems.

As goes our legislators, so goes our nation:

2009-02-07T12:22:00.003-05:00

Good advice from Lily Garcia of The Washington Post on how to maintain personal integrity in the midst of governmental and corporate dysfunction.

Are you losing your home?

2009-02-05T09:45:00.004-05:00

Is 'Home Equity Theft' the problem?

Have you considered your defenses?

How important is an Oath of Office?

2009-01-22T19:27:00.011-05:00

Judge Roberts took the time to administer to President Barak Obama a correct Oath of Office.

Why didn't Magistrate Judge Sean McGraw think it necessary to administer the correct Oath of Office to Fell Township Tax Collector June M. Borosky?

The correct oath can be located in the Constitution of Pennsylvania Article VI, Section 3.

And, this is the Oath of Office subscribed to by Lackawanna County Magistrate Judge, Sean McGraw and Fell Township Tax Collector, June Borosky on January 12th, 2006.

Are June Borosky and Sean McGraw willfully engaged in criminal activity on the part of an organized and extensive group of people?

Is it June Borosky's and Sean McGraw's purpose to 1: extort money or advantage by threat or force, and 2: carry out a pattern of illegal activity in furtherance of an enterprise which is owned or controlled by those engaged in such activity?

THE ILLUSION OF FREEDOM: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES

2008-12-08T09:15:00.005-05:00

Integrity: Whether for good or for evil . . .

2008-12-04T22:52:00.014-05:00

Whether for good or for evil, "Integrity is built in the DNA of the Casey family." Here is the article from which that was quoted:

Here are some facts.

- The Lackawanna County Commissioners’ “Bond Counsel” is Dilworth Paxson, LLP.

- Dilworth Paxson is listed as having donated $10,000 + to the United Nations Association - USA (page 27).

- The UNA-USA is a global "non-profit" organization whose members “organize” and implement "foreign policy" to build "public support for constructive U.S. leadership (NOT in these united States, UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES of AMERICA, or our united states, but) in a more effective United Nations"!

- Former Governor Casey once managed the Scranton offices of Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish, and Kaufman.

- Christopher H. Casey, (brother to Senator Bob Casey and the topic of the above article), is currently a partner in Dilworth Paxson LLP.

- A 08-21-2008 article by Amaris Elliott-Engel, Pa. Courts Pursuing Conciliation for Foreclosures credits Senator Casey and ACORN's Pennsylvania Legislative Director Ian Phillips with an initiative that "hopes that court systems don't worry about designing the perfect program and move ahead" to address the issue of foreclosure while protecting the current global feudalistic, debenture styled, monetary system.

- On February 21, 1936, assessment against community minded stockholders in the Simpson State Bank were to be paid to Jerome P. Casey, then Deputy Receiver, at his office, 434 Lackawanna Avenue, Scranton, Pennsylvania. Counsel for Luther A. Harr, Secretary of Banking of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, at that time was; Edward J. Kelly, Frank M. Walsh, and Ellis Berger.

According to the Measuring Worth calculator, $1,121,980.52 in the year 2007 had the same "purchase power" as $75,000 in the year 1936.

You, the reader, can decide for your self whether the integrity of the Casey family is for good or for evil.

Financial Markets: An Organic Solution

2008-09-29T08:31:00.002-04:00

Every Jew who say they are a Jew of the tribe of Yehuda (Judah) has reason to know Torah; i.e., 'The Law'. Relief for our economic dilemma is given in Torah. Who is hindering the solution from being brought forward and implemented?

Contained within the 614 Laws that are represented by their tzitizt are those of the "land Sabbaths", the "year of release" and the "year of jubilee". Each have to do with the economic as well as the environmental health of their greater nation, Yisrael (Israel).

So, Why are we not hearing the Shofar (Trumpet) sounded in Congress and either a year of release or a year of jubilee proclaimed?

Which "God" is being honored by the Jews in Congress and in our financial institutions? Yahweh or Mammon?

The Right to bear arms in defense of one's self and their nation.

2008-09-14T12:01:00.009-04:00

U.S. Senators get a lesson from Suzanna Gratia-Hupp on the true intent of the 2nd Amendment.

"BONDS": Are they UNCONSCIONABLE, IN VIOLATION of RICO STATUTES, or TREASON?

2008-08-29T23:17:00.032-04:00

At first glance I was pleased with some of the corrections and amendments proposed by the Lackawanna County Commissioners prior to their enactment of this latest authorization to incur a nonelectoral irrevocable debt on the future labor of the county’s taxpayers. I was especially intrigued, however, when I read on page 2, number 3 of the blue bound ordinance I viewed at the offices of the County Commissioners, that the “Note shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America . . . payable in full at maturity . . . 100% of the principal amount. . . plus interest accrued to date of prepayment.” How is this possible? Certainly the Lackawanna County Commissioners have access to the same information as I. Don't they? Presuming the County Commissioners to be fully aware of their fiduciary responsibilities to provide positive Seigniorage to this county’s inhabitants, I expected them to know that “Lawful Money” is “Any form of currency issued by the United States Treasury and not the Federal Reserve System . . . Lawful money stands in contrast to fiat money, to which the government assigns value although it has no intrinsic value of its own and is not backed by reserves. Fiat money includes legal tender such as paper money, checks, drafts and bank notes. . . . the dollar bills that we carry around in our wallets are not considered lawful money. The notation on the bottom of a U.S. dollar bill reads "Legal Tender for All Debts, Public and Private", and is issued by the U.S. Federal Reserve, not the U.S. Treasury. Legal tender can be exchanged for an equivalent amount of lawful money, but effects such as inflation can change the value of fiat money. Lawful money is said to be the most direct form of ownership, . . . .” Therefore, since “peonage” is said to have been abolished, I am curious as to whether our County Commissioners are truly performing their fiduciary duties to this county’s inhabitants who are statutorly mandated to use money that has been issued by the Federal Reserve that has no intrinsic value, and precludes "ownership", or whether they are erecting on some entity's behalf a “new and independent state within the limits of this commonwealth”? Here’s why: The LEGAL NOTICE published in the Thursday, August 28, 2008 issue of the Scranton Times-Tribune (page D4), stated that on August 27, 2008 the Lackawanna County Commissioners enacted an Ordinance authorizing the County to incur nonelectoral debt with amendments and corrections. Listed in the amendments was the acceptance of the “Purchase Proposal” by the following entities: RBC Capital Markets Corporation, (a US Broker dealer affiliate of RBC Dominion Securities Inc. and the Royal Bank of Canada, and Member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) that insures investors against loss); Janney Montgomery Scott LLC; and, PNC Capital Markets LLC (PNC has been a longtime supporter of the United Nations Association of USA Northeastern Pennsylvania and the IMF). What I did not see mentioned in this Notice is that the Commissioners’ “Bond Counsel” is Dilworth Paxson, LLP. Dilworth Paxson is listed as having donated $10,000 + to the United Nations Association - USA (page 27). The UNA-USA is a global "non-profit" organization whose members “organize” and implement "foreign policy" to build "public support for constructive U.S. leadership (NOT in these united States, or our united states, but) in a more effective United Nations"! I wondered how many people who have been contracted by adhesion to this ordinance by their County Commissioners know that former Governor Casey once managed the Scranton offices of Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish, and Kaufman, and that Christopher H. Casey, brother to Senator Bob Casey, is currently a partner in Dilworth Paxson LLP, and that in 2002 several other prominent lawmakers (including Don Sherwood, Christopher Carney and James Wansacz) were on the Board of Directors of the United Nations Association of USA Northeastern Pennsylvania?

I wondered if the Lackawanna County Commissioners were aware of the etymology of the word "Seigniorage" that best defines their delegated duties? I wondered if they knew the meaning of seigniory and Seigniors if it would matter to them and how they viewed their "counsel"? According to investopedia.com “Seigniorage” is “The difference between the value of money and the cost to produce it - in other words, the economic cost of producing a currency within a given economy or country. If the seigniorage is positive, then the government will make an economic profit; a negative seigniorage will result in an economic loss. Seigniorage may be counted as revenue for a government when the money that is created is worth more than it costs to produce it. This revenue is often used by governments to finance a portion of their expenditures without having to collect taxes. If, for example, it costs the U.S. government $0.05 to produce a $1 bill, the seigniorage is $0.95, or the difference between the two amounts." (See below: "FEDERAL RESERVE HIT IN TALK BY LAMNECK".) A “Seignior”, however, is the "lord of a manor, . . (a) feudal landowner . . . ." See also, “seigniory” at wordreference.com. I wondered if this ordinance may be considered "unconscionable", in violation of RICO statutes, AND treasonous? The following article was published on page 16 of the April 19, 1937 issue of The Scranton Times.

To see the humor in this "investment" by our "best and brightest" "leaders" with the Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), watch this very short Canadian video.

FEDERAL RESERVE HIT IN TALK BY LAMNECK
Washington, April 19 - Representative Lamneck (D Ohio) told the house today the federal reserve system is committing legally "the greatest burglary in history." Critizing the system in the midst of a plea that the budget be balanced to avert "calamity," the Ohioan said that for a $300 investment a bank could get a $30,000 return. "If a burglar had a license to steal, he said, "he would at least have to carry away his loot. The federal reserve system has its loot brought to it." Lamneck said this was a procedure for a "steal" authorized by congress.
The treasury asks bids for several million dollars worth of bonds. A banker says he will take a million dollars worth and credits the treasury on his books with a million dollars. Then he deposits the bonds with a federal reserve agent as collateral security for a million dollars in federal reserve notes and agrees to pay the cost of printing the currency - about $300. He now has a million dollars in currency to balance the million dollar deposit he credited to the treasury. He still owns the bonds and can collect the interest, about $20,000 a year on an investment of $300.

"PREDATORY LENDERS" are those Democrat and Republican legislators who claim to represent our 'best interest' as they "SUPPLY" our "good faith" credit "ON DEMAND" to the owners of the world's banks in exchange for the devalued coin and debentured promissory "NOTES" that they mandated be used by us as "LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE". In other words; IT'S THE HAND PICKED DEMOCRAT AND REPUBLICAN "LAW MAKERS" THAT WE PUT INTO OFFICE WITH OUR VOTE (OR LACK OF IT) WHO ARE THE "PREDATORY LENDERS".

1782 - An ACT to prevent the erecting any new state . . .

2008-08-19T20:05:00.035-04:00

The General Assembly of Pennsylvania passed, in the seventh General Assembly - the first Session of which commenced October, 28th, and ended December 4th 1782. The second commenced January 15th, and ended March 22d, 1783. - And the third commenced August 14th, and ended September 26th, 1783. - Frederick Augustus Muhlenberg, Speaker.

CHAPTER DCCCCLXXXIX (989) - An ACT to prevent the erecting any new and independent state within the limits of this commonwealth provides in part that "Persons erecting or attempting to erect any new government within this commonwealth declared guilty of high treason; or noticing the inhabitants to meet for that purpose; or advising the same at any meeting of the people. (See the constitution of the United States: Article 4, section 3.1 and Article 6, section 2.) Council enabled to call out the militia to supress offences against this act."

Also, below is a "Declaration of Intention" from 1899 and 1924.

Notice the wording?

Mathew Jankola's 1899 intent is for "citizenship" in the "United States", Drob's intent is for "citizenship" in the "United States of America".

Presumptions have been promulgated by judicial belligerents based on the principles set forth in TERRACE v. THOMPSON; a ruling that blatantly demands that a lawful freeholder, in these united states of America, who is subject to the Ten Commandments, submit a formally declared bona fide intention to renounce forever all allegiance and fidelity to the sovereignty to which he lately has been a subject, and to become a citizen of the United States. In Pennsylvania, parents unwittingly "SUBJECT" their children to debt servitude. Click HERE to see how.

Remember to click HERE to see how you may (unwittingly) be applying for debt servitude to a new and independent state. A United Nations' State within the limits of this commonwealth with complete representation! Bipartisan representation that (ironically) was elected by the people!

How well do you know your "self"?

2008-08-17T19:02:00.009-04:00

What would you do if the woman in this 3+ minute video asked you to sign her petition?

Would you sign her petition?

Why?

Why not?

RACKETEERING OF DEBENTURE AND OTHER SECURITIES

2008-06-22T11:16:00.007-04:00

To - Fax: LACKAWANNA COUNTY COURT
Judge, Michael J. Barrasse – 570-963-xxxx
Judge, Vito P. Geroulo - 570-496-xxxx
CC: District Attorney Andrew Jarbola, III - 570-963-xxxx
Representative James Wansacz – 717-772-2284/705-7018
Sen. Robert Mellow - 570-839-4816
Rep. Chris Carney - 570-585-9977, 202-225-9594
Governor’s Northeast Regional Office - 570-614-2094
Media - Bloggers and other concerned people: http://www.thetruthstore.blogspot.com
From: Veronica A. HANNEVIG
Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Subject: Click on RACKETEERING OF DEBENTURE AND OTHER SECURITIES for more information about this fax.

Docket Nos: CP-35-SA-0000065-2006, CP-35-SA-0000067-2006, CP-35-SA-0000066-2006, CP-35-SA-0000070-2006, CP-35-SA-0000072-2006, CP-35-SA-0000075-2006 AND TR-0000860-06 AND 1684 MDA 2006

Pages: 3

This is to acknowledge my receipt of the intimidating attached unsigned demand for $120.00 from “debt collector” CHARLENE SARVER at NATIONAL RECOVERY AGENCY, PO BOX 67015, HARRISBURG, PA 17106-7015; “A PROFESSIONAL COLLECTION AGENCY” (presumably) on behalf of TRI COUNTY HUMAN SVC CT (3168952) for the services your court requested of them on 06/13/07.

With this fax I remind the court that on Friday, January 18, 2008 (see fax below this fax) I returned to TRI COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES their unsigned 12/31/07 extortionary demand for “120.00”. Also, via that same fax a copy was forwarded to Judge Vito P. Geroulo for presentment to his ‘bonded surety’, Michael Barrasse, for his payment to TRI COUNTY for the evaluative services he ordered; evaluative services that were not relevant to the Petition For Review of Constitutional questions regarding jurisdiction (or, agency), title (or, identity) and ownership (whether ownership of a bona fide American flag and 1987 Toyota Camry is “absolute” or “conditional”). Judge Barrasse’s “order” was designed to force me to either voluntarily comply with servitude to the Lackawanna County Commissioners’ prison industry for 18 to 36 months, or agree to assassinate my self’s reputation and character by voluntary submitting to an unconscionable and usurious payment with debt based money for a mental evaluation that would imply that I was somehow mentally unstable or deficient for petitioning his court with a Constitutionally permissible redress of a grievance. Such blatant disregard by officers of the court for the ‘rule of law’ makes me shudder with FEAR; fear for my self, my descendents and my nation!

Were the objective deliberations of officers in this Lackawanna County Court truly determined to adjudicate the above captioned dockets in the honorable manner anticipated, both Judge Geroulo and Judge Barrasse would simply offset any outstanding charges. (See the following FAX to the LACKAWANNA COUNTY OFFICE OF COURT COLLECTIONS dated Tuesday, March 11, 2008.) So, what else is going on?

Since the aforementioned fax was sent to TRI COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES, et al, on Friday, January 18, 2008; and while Judge Geroulo either failed to take action, or deliberately withheld his response to my petition, I have learned that ownership of the controverted 1987 Toyota Camry sedan VIN JT2SV21E6H3142887 had been conveyed without my knowledge to G&G Towing, Carbondale, Pennsylvania even while it remains insured by me through Allstate Insurance until July 3, 2008!

It has become apparent that a “pattern of racketeering activity” and “organized crime” has emerged in which “at least two incidents of racketeering” have been conducted by persons in the Commonwealth’s unified court system since February, 2005. The pattern includes, “extortion” of what I believe (absent any adjudication to the contrary) to be my property by Judges McGraw, Geroulo and Barrasse, the withholding of action with respect to my legal claims and defenses which include and is not limited to “kidnapping”; i.e., being held in a condition of involuntary servitude, and Judge Barrasse’s threatened force and fear to keep me therein under color of official right.

* * * * * * * * * * * * January 18, 2008 Fax * * * * * * * * * * * *

To-Fax (Email): TRI COUNTY HUMAN SERVICE - 570-282-xxxx
Judge, Vito P. Geroulo - 570-496-xxxx
Rep. Jim Wansacz - 570-254-7063, 451-3306
Sen. Robert Mellow - 570-839-4816
Rep. Chris Carney - 570-585-9977, 202-225-9594
Governor’s Northeast Regional Office - 570-614-2094
Media - Bloggers, and Other concerned people go to: http://www.thetruthstore.blogspot.com
From: VERONICA A HANNEVIG
Date: Friday, January 18, 2008

Subject: Update - FRAUDULENT MISUSE OF MOTOR VEHICLE, ID/DRIVER LICENSE CREDENTIALS by government officials and agents - Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. VERONICA A HANNEVIG

Pages: 2

The attached TRI COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES unsigned 12/31/07 demand for "120.00" is hereby (via fax) being returned to TRI COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES and forwarded to Judge Vito P. Geroulo for presentment to his surety*, Michael Barrasse, for the payment requested for the services he ordered.

In the future, please submit any further billing to he who had bonded himself in suretyship with Judge Vito P. Geroulo and Magistrate Sean P. McGraw. Billing advice is as follows:

Judge, Michael Barrasse
200 North Washington Avenue
Scranton, Pennsylvania 18503

*Surety - Security against loss; a person bound for the faithful performance of a contract by another.

* * * * * * * Synopsis of the Controversy * * * * * * *

1. On February 1, 2006, without evidence of a bona fide warrant, City of Carbondale Police Officers James Reed, Badge #126 and Dave Fofi, Badge #110, seized from me a white 1987 Toyota Camry sedan VIN JT2SV21E6H3142887 and a metal, un-obscured Title 4 U.S.C. §1, and

2 American Flag with the printing "Sovereign, Private Property, Non-Commercial American" that identified both my jurisdiction and a recorded unrebutted Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) lien conspicuously displayed on the metal by an affixed sticker; 99-cv-2497.

3. At the time of the aforementioned seizure on February 1, 2006, no citations were issued.

4. On February 3, 2006, via Certified Mail (70050390000226773478 and 70050390000226773485) I afforded Officers Reed and Fofi an opportunity to privately resolve this matter in accordance with law consistent with my non-commercial jurisdiction and their Oaths of Office, specifically Article 1 of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the U.S. Constitution with the first ten (10) Amendments as ratified in 1791.

5. On February 9, 2006 I received thirteen (13) SUMMONS with attached CITATION/SUMMONS wherein each the “Defendant’s signature” acknowledging receipt of the Citation was indicated by Officer James Reed as “FILED”.

6. I have no knowledge of my “signature” being “FILED” to be used as a witness against my self or in acknowledgment of any Citation with the City of Carbondale Police Department.

7. On February 13, 2006 Magistrate Sean McGraw, Esquire, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Magisterial District Court No: 45-3-03 was offered an opportunity to resolve what appeared to be a justiciable claim by providing statutory proof that would substantiate the thirteen (13) claims cited by Officer James Reed. Attached to this offer was an Affidavit of Publication of the Legal Notices that were run for four (4) consecutive weeks beginning 5/27/1999 to 6/16/1999 that advised the reader that the aforementioned Toyota would be identified by a private Flag showing "Sovereign, Private Property, Non-Commercial American" and copies of Certified Mail receipts showing the delivery of this ‘affidavit of publication’ to the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, PA State Police, Lackawanna County Sheriff’s Department, the Department of Revenue, and the Attorney General’s office.

8. On March 17, 2006 a neutral forum for mediation (Alternative Dispute Resolution, ADR) between me and Magistrate Sean McGraw, Esquire was requested to resolve the underlying principles involved with diverse jurisdictions and the return of the property described in paragraph one (1) as a Toyota and a flag.

9. On March 17, 2006 I received from Magistrate Sean McGraw, Esquire, thirteen “NOTICE OF TRIAL SUMMARY CASE”, Docket Nos.: TR-0000155-06, TR-0000158-06, TR-0000162-06, TR-0000160-06, TR-0000157-06, TR-0000164-06, TR-0000165-06, TR-0000166-06, TR-0000159-06, TR-0000161-06, TR-0000163-06, TR-0000153-06, AND TR-0000154-06 wherein Magistrate McGraw stated, “This court has received your plea of NOT GUILTY to the above summary violation(s). The sum of $.00 has been accepted as collateral for your appearance at trial.”

10. Seeing that I had not entered a plea of “NOT GUILTY” to Magistrate McGraw or District Court No: 45-3-03, such unauthorized action by Magistrate McGraw might be reasonably questioned in that it would be deemed as practicing law from the bench, and/or acting under an alleged power of attorney that I had not granted to him.

11. Consistent with “the law of the Flag” and my non-commercial jurisdiction wherein I am obligated to ‘agree with my adversary quickly, while I am with him in the way’, on April 17, 2006 each of the thirteen (13) “NOT GUILTY” pleas were “FULLY ACCEPTED AND RETURNED FOR VALUE.” I further requested that the “TITLE BE RELEASED AND THE ACCOUNT CLOSED”.

12. Magistrate McGraw asserted his option to remain silent; 1. to my offer to him to resolve a justiciable claim by providing to me the statutory proof(s) that would substantiate the thirteen (13) claims cited by Officer James Reed, 2. to my offer to resolve the underlying principles and interests involved with an adjudication of title as it applied to my claim to diverse jurisdictions by ADR (see paragraph 7), 3. with regard to the return of what I believed to be my property (see paragraphs 1 and 11) and for which I continued to maintain insurance in good faith, and, 3. his prejudicial action as referenced in paragraph 10 herein.

13. By their prejudicial actions Magistrate McGraw and Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas Judge, Vito P. Geroulo have shown a personal interest in the above captioned dockets and appeared to have deliberately instigated and maintained a pattern of events consistent with “larceny by fraud” whereby D.O.T. records now show G & G Towing as the “owner” of the controverted 1987 Toyota (see the attached DOT abstract and my proof of Allstate Insurance which is valid until July 3, 2008).

I do not take 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904 lightly. Neither do I take lightly Title 1 Pa.C.S. § 1503(c)(4) and the “inherent and indefeasible rights” secured within Article 1 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania - most specifically the control or interference “with the rights of conscience” - as provided in Section 3, and “any law impairing the obligation of contracts, or making irrevocable any grant of special privileges or immunities” as provided in Section 17!

* * * March 11, 2008 Fax for "Win - Win" Remedial Action * * *

To - Fax: LACKAWANNA COUNTY OFFICE OF COURT COLLECTIONS
Catherine Kacer - 570-496-xxxx
CC: Representative James Wansacz – 717-772-2284/705-7018
District Attorney Andrew Jarbola, III - 570-963-xxxx
Sen. Robert Mellow - 570-839-4816
Rep. Chris Carney - 570-585-9977
Governor’s Northeast Regional Office - 570-614-2094
Media - Bloggers and other concerned people: http://www.thetruthstore.blogspot.com
From: Veronica A. HANNEVIG
Date: Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Subject: Docket Nos: CP-35-SA-0000065-2006, CP-35-SA-0000067-2006, CP-35-SA-0000066-2006, CP-35-SA-0000070-2006, CP-35-SA-0000072-2006, CP-35-SA-0000075-2006 AND TR-0000860-06

Pages: 6

This is to acknowledge my receipt of Catherine Kacer’s invitation to me to “appear for a court hearing scheduled for 05/16/2008, 12:30 PM in court collections”. (See attached 2 pages.)

In lieu of an appearance ‘in the flesh’ I am including with this fax the three page “CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE” that was previously provided to the court on June 4, 2007 between 2:25 and 3:02 PM. The “CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE” preceded my prior 06/08/2007 appearance ‘in the flesh’ before Judge Michael Barrasse. As the court will recall, when I arrived ‘in the flesh’ for the previous “hearing” on 06/08/2007 I was subsequently incarcerated. It was evident that the “hearing” was not scheduled for me to be “heard” on the substantive matters originally brought before Judge Vito P. Geroulo as a benign “petition for review”, but for me to “hear” an irrelevant pre-textual conviction by Judge Michael Barrasse that was based on the false presentation of an unidentified “public defender”. I, therefore, responsibly choose to defend and protect my self from any further injury and abuse ‘in the flesh’ by your court and respectfully decline your offer to participate in a court hearing on May 16, 2008 at 12:30 PM in court collections; nevertheless I offer this court three ‘win-win’ options:

1. If you believe the purpose of your court is to show a profit for the Lackawanna County Commissioners as they “trade” the securities of the County through their listing in Dun & Bradstreet, then I respectfully remind you that I entered the Court of Common Pleas ‘in forma pauperis’ in May, 2006. As such, I presume the court to have the same authority to use the signature that Officer James Reed alleged to be mine to offset my Treasury Department “credits” for the alleged “debt” of $550.00.

2. If you believe that what I believed to be my property was indeed my property and I am due “just compensation” for it being taken without due process, then you can use the same signature that was used by Officer James Reed and offset my Treasury Department account “credits” and pay me the incurred “debt” that now amounts to approximately $xxx,xxx,xxx.00.

3. If the property I believed to be mine had always been the property of the State or Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and never mine, then I am due “just compensation” for the cost of that property and the (now) 18 ½ years that I had maintained it in good faith on behalf of the State/Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Again, the solution is the same. You can use the same signature that was used by Officer James Reed to convict me and simply offset my Treasury Department account “credits” by “debiting” my account the approximate $xxx,xxx,xxx.00 that is owed to me.

If you choose to offset my Treasury Department “credits” for the alleged “debt” of $550.00, please provide to me a receipt that it has been “paid”. Otherwise, a cashier check can be made payable to VERONICA A HANNEVIG and sent via certified mail to XXX MAIN STREET, SIMPSON, PENNSYLVANIA XXXXX.

WHAT DOES PAYING TAXES HAVE TO DO WITH INTEGRITY?

2008-06-05T19:44:00.001-04:00

A County "ORDINANCE" to which I was in opposition, passed on May 28, 2008.

On Monday, June 2, 2008 I visited the offices of the County Commissioners to view the signature pages to find out to whom the sinking fund interest would be assigned.

What I found was that the Lackawanna County Commissioners had signed an incomplete agreement whereby they had authorized their 'wet ink' signature to be used electronically.

For (at least) 71 years politicans have known, or had reason to know, how "bonds" are monetized. In knowing how bonds are monetized, there is NO excuse for them to allow anyone, or any entity, other than the CREDITORS, i.e., We, The People who have paid into these funds with our labor, to have the monetary advantages that these County Commissioners are "Assigning" to Banks and other private entities!

Were the Democrats and Republicans looking out after the best interest of we, the People, we should have MAYBE been required to pay a 'one time' property tax.

The one time tax would have allow our municipalities to bundle their assets and periodically re-invest the interest for the sole benefit of the people and their municipal infrastructure.

The signature pages of this ordinance, an ordinance that (when read in its entirity) claims that the Commissioners cannot be held liable for their decisions, shows a pattern of organized activity that includes local tax collectors up to, and including, judges who sit as treasonous pundits pompusoly rendering decisions that exclude the fact that this blatant fraud exist.

Bottom line: We are at a juncture in our history. We either continue to keep up the pace of making (analogous) bricks without straw for our feudalistic masters; or, we turn it about. We keep the monetary system the way it is and demand that we be paid what we are owed in repariations for the past 75 years that we and our ancestors have been enduring government extortion for FEAR of the 'pains and penalties' to do otherwise.

In The Scranton Times archives for April 19, 1937, page 16 I found the following article:

FEDERAL RESERVE HIT IN TALK BY LAMNECK

Washington, April 19 - Representative Lamneck (D Ohio) told the house today the federal reserve system is committing legally "the greatest burglary in history."

Critizing the system in the midst of a plea that the budget be balanced to avert "calamity," the Ohioan said that for a $300 investment a bank could get a $30,000 return."

The treasury asks bids for several million dollars worth of bonds. A banker says he will take a million dollars worth and credits the treasury on his books with a million dollars.

Then he deposits the bonds with a federal reserve agent as collateral security for a million dollars in federal reserve notes and agrees to pay the cost of printing the currency - about $300.

He now has a million dollars in currency to balance the million dollar deposit he credited to the treasury.

He still owns the bonds and can collect the interest, about $20,000 a year on an investment of $300.
http://www.thetruthstore.blogspot.com/

"Iron sharpens iron". Here is the letter I FAXED in opposition to the "ORDINANCE". Probably less than "perfect", but may be usable for others in their local dealings.

May 28, 2008

County of Lackawanna Pennsylvania
Office of the Commissioners
Michael J. Washo
Corey D. O’BrienA.J. Munchak
Courthouse Administration Building
200 Adams Avenue
Scranton, Pennsylvania 18503
570-963-6812 (fax)

RE: OPPOSITION TO “AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOAR4D OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF LACKAWANNA, PENNSYLVANIA AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY OF LACKAWANNA, PENNSYLVANIA TO ISSUE GENERAL OBLIGATION NOTES, SERIES A OF 2008 AND FEDERALLY TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION NOTES, SERIES B OF 2008, IN ORDER TO REFUND CERTAIN OUTSTANDING DEBT AND TO FUND CERTAIN CAPITAL PROJECTS”

In accordance with the “severability clause” of 53 Pa.C.S. with this fax I am ‘voicing’ my opposition to the above captioned “ORDINANCE”. Attached you will find documents to support my Constitutional opposition which is also in accordance with Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, The Federalist Papers #48 and the concerns of the General Assembly of Pennsylvania under the Articles of Confederation in 1782.

I will attempt to make known my concerns from three perspectives; the lawful, the legal and the prophetic, within the parameters of your fiduciary duties as representatives to the people of the county and the essential characteristics of indenture contracts; those which are “adhesion” and “unconscionable”. But, first, I preface what I am about to say with the well known, yet to be rebutted, fundamental point of reference upon which I present lawful, legal and prophetic opposition to this, or any other such ORDINANCE that may be promulgated.

PREFACE
Recent documentaries have revealed that the cost to the owners of the Federal Reserve (those who print the American people’s ‘units of exchange’, i.e., “dollars” or “money”) is approximately $.042 to print a "bill" of any denomination, therefore, when a worker receives $10.00 for his/her labor the owners of the Federal Reserve profit approximately $9.958 just for printing that “bill”. Another +/- $2.00 (20%) Federal Tax is then demanded by agents of the IRS on behalf of those who print the money. As I calculate it, with the present use of these "bills", for each $10.00 of a working man's labor his DEBT to the owners of the Federal Reserve (those who print the money) is approximately $11.96. Should a laborer acquiesce by chip or plastic card (i.e., a likely future use of any “Real [government issued] ID”) to a totally cashless economy, the profits to the owners of the Federal Reserve will increase exponentially! Without consideration for other forms of taxation and interest on loans and mortgages, American men and women will profit those who oversee the manufacturing of the card or chip they must use; approximately $12.00 for every $10.00 of a man's labor! In fact, when you take the time to do the math, you will see that Governor Rendell’s $2.00 per hour increase in the “minimum wage” of Pennsylvanians still kept the affected ‘wage earner’ at “minimum wage” and essentially increased the revenues of the owners of the Federal Reserve (at least) $1.92 per hour, per the tens of thousands of recipients!

Today the people of our nation and this county are at a threshold. Will you, our elected representatives who took an oath to support, obey and defend with fidelity the Pennsylvania and U.S. Constitutions of a “republic” with a democratic process, support, obey and defend with fidelity that Form of government to which you pledge your allegiance and swore your oath? Or, Will you, volunteer the people of this county further into a “feudal” form of governance with a communistic “party” process wherein the ‘American dream’ will be based on an optimal form of voluntary indebted servitude to a (relative) ‘handful of men’ who print the money and “register” themselves as the “absolute owner” of that money.

HISTORY
According to "http://findlaw.com/" - "All that is necessary for most contracts to be legally valid are the following two elements:

· All parties are in agreement (after an offer has been made by one party and accepted by the other).

· Something of value has been exchanged, such as cash, services, or goods (or a promise to exchange such an item) for something else of value. "

Therefore, given the binding nature of our freewill participation in contracts, it is disingenuous to believe that the "Charters" (i.e., the ‘corporate contracts’) that were granted to "new world" colonizers (including "William Penn, Esquire, and his heirs and assigns" in 1681 by Charles the Second, Chancellor Heneage, Lord Finch, and their heirs and successors) somehow (miraculously) disappeared in 1776 by a few (relatively speaking) signatures on a “Declaration of Independence”. Or, in 1791 with the ratification of the “Bill of Rights”, i.e., the first 10 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

Indeed, Esquire Penn's “tribute” obligations to his corporate feudal masters most likely remained in tact and it was simply a matter of business-as-usual for European investors to commission their 'privy councilors' to promulgate the contract law(s) that would continue to govern their global commerce to this day. No doubt that this was, and continues to be, easily done with the blessings of the people who have not yet recognized that their venerated Constitution was written in 'doublespeak'! Since the birth of our nation platitudes like "emancipation", "reconstruction", "reorganization", “war on terror”, etc. have toyed with our emotions and left us vulnerable to proverbial “ravaging wolves in sheep’s clothing”. Have we forgotten that "councilors" still promulgate the laws upon which the courts must act? And that the “privy councilors” became the “Board of Trade and Plantations”? What (now) are they called in the global marketplace? Are they now members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) who are using members of the United States Congress, State Legislators and Commissioners in “Quasi-Municipal Corporations” as their “Suppliers” of debt under the Uniform Commercial Code? Have you considered that you may have been “commissioned” to broker to corporate “masters” absolute ownership of other people’s labors and physical and intellectual properties?

THE LAWFULAccording to http://www.findlaw.com/ 'the freedom of contract' is "a power or right to contract and freely determine the provisions of contracts without arbitrary or unreasonable legal restrictions esp. as guaranteed under the contract clause of Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution". The Congress of these united States, however, had the power to Amend this Constitution: And they did!

THE LEGALWith the 13th and 14th Amendments to the original, duly ratified U.S. Constitution of 1791, preparatory steps were taken by Congress to, in a business-as-usual manner, re-venue into the system of government with which they were most comfortable ALL Americans who were willing to alienate (or lien) themselves from their "unalienable Rights" into a statutory form of feudalism. In 1865 the 13th Amendment was crafted with words that allow for 'voluntary servitude' and "punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted".

Furthermore, Congress gave themselves the "power to enforce this article (the 13th Amendment; i.e., voluntary servitude) by appropriate legislation". The next step in this re-venuing scheme came in 1868. Complimentary with feudalistic governance and an (oligarchic) party process, Democrat and Republican members of Congress gave to themselves jurisdiction over the descendants of those Americans who voluntarily "ceded" themselves into statutory servitude in a manner consistent with the laws enacted to facilitate an economy based on the principles of “debenture”. With the assistance of the Democrat and Republican members of Congress, a silent (plutocratic) coup incrementally continued in 1913 with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act and the 16th and 17th Amendments, in 1933 with Roosevelt's monetary 'reorganization' (a “New Deal” for his plutocratic cronies), in 1964 with the Civil Rights Act, then with the Coinage Act of 1965 whereby, (according to wikipedia) constitutionally mandated silver was eliminated from the circulating dimes and quarter dollars, and diminished in the half dollar. In addition to the above provisions, for which it is best known, the act:

* Made all coins and currency of the United States (including certain bank issues) a legal tender. This has been taken to reverse the demonetisation of the Trade Dollar, and

* Gave the Secretary (of the Treasury) broad discretion to enter into contracts to assure an adequate supply of clad coins, without regard to public procurement laws.

Fortunately, in Pennsylvania, the crafters of the Pennsylvania Constitution had the foresight to provide remedy to those men and women who would become cognizant of this blatant “bait and switch” fraud and in Article 1, Section 17 provided that; "No ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, or making irrevocable any grant of special privileges or immunities, shall be passed." What safeguards are you putting into the above captioned “ORDINANCE” that will protect and defend the inhabitants within the County who choose not to have debt based “liens” placed on their “unalienable”/”inalienable” Rights?

THE PROPHETIC
Prophecy, when it comes to pass, is nothing more than the consequences of predictable societal behaviors.

The prophecy found in Rev. 13:16-17 seems consistent with the mandated Real ID AND with the anticipated consequences of the normal behaviors of a statutorily oppressed people who may be “fearful, and unbelieving” (Rev. 21:8).

"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads (i.e., perhaps a ‘mind set’ in the ‘executive functioning’ area of one’s brain?): And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name"

BUT, (if I’m correct in my assessment) there’s another side of this prophecy. It’s found in Rev. 18:11–13:

“And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more: The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, . . . and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.”

Who knows! It may be that all that is needed is a leader with access that encourages and sustains the “courage” of others to come out of an economic bondage of their own making. After all, one would think that a people who have been praying “Thy kingdom come” for 2000 years and have the ability to “bind” and “loose” at will would be more than willing to follow such a leader and collectively shake off their oppressors.

In my opinion, the promulgation of this “ORDINANCE” is a mere formality to give credible authority to a parallel system of feudal governance that IF ALLOWED will authorize the final death blow to our (previously guaranteed) constitutional republic, and usher in that which “Christians” have feared for two millennia.

I can only quote scripture, speak from the objective lessons of History. The destiny of our nation begins at the local levels of government; i.e., with you.

Therefore, it is my desire that whatever you, in the office of “County Commissioner” decide to do that you include provisions that will “support, obey and defend” the Constitutional protections provided for men and women, like my self, who choose NOT to apply for commercial benefits and privileges that must be paid for with a debt-based currency, a “legal” fiat “tender” that alienates us from our “unalienable Rights” and causes many to suffer undue ‘pains and penalties’ from court officers who choose to gain political favor by sustaining, what amounts to, treasonous Bills of Attainder.

My personal evaluation of the lawful, legal and prophetic characteristics of the proposed mandated legislation has been from the vantage of a 1960’s era (pre Treasury Department “mercenary”) Navy veteran who took an oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution. I am a woman who believes the "self evident truth" that she "resides" in her "freehold" (i.e., her "self"/”body” whose name is the “title” that “identifies” her) until she returns (at death) to her "domicile" wherein she must give an account to her “Creator”. With that said, ANY “AGREEMENT”; i.e., “CONTRACT” that you would make for debt based money, that essentially enslaves the labors of my future generations to the future generations of the mere men who print that money, would violate my Sovereign's Law against "coveting" that “benefit” or “privilege”, and "stealing" to get it! Such are the characteristics and subsequent consequences of the indenture contracts that have been legislated by Democrat and Republican Congressional and State legislators since the Civil War. Clearly, we, the inhabitants of our nation, and Lackawanna County, have been legislated into a form of mandated statutory feudalism by systemic adhesion and unconscionable contracts with those who print the U.S. currency, our mandated unit of exchange. Our ‘legal tender’ has been monopolized by a global oligarchy of plutocrats whose ultimate goal appears to be the megalomaniacal occupation and distribution of the labors and produce of our global resources; human and otherwise. The councilors who craft and mandate ORDINANCES such as this would, at the founding of our republic, have been “guilty of high treason”! I ask that you reject this proposed “ORDINANCE”, which appears to be based on FRAUD, and negotiate that reparations be demanded that would return to the inhabitants, i.e., the true “creditors” in this current economy, that which they had paid in “taxes” to Lackawanna County since 1965. Once the constitutionally proper relationship is re-established, I anticipate that successful economic conditions will prevail, not only for the county, but all who dwell therein.
Respectfully yours,

Veronica A. HANNEVIG
xxxx Main Street
xxxxxxxxx, Pennsylvania xxxxx

Attached: 4 pages (8 total)
cc: Other people who are interested in this matter

INTEGRITY WORKSHOPS

2004-03-03T11:47:00.003-05:00

For Communities That Care

INTEGRITY WORKSHOPS focus on the seven identified areas of wellness and how they are used by media to promote the form of government known as "Democracy".

Learn the principles of each of the following identified areas of wellness and how they relate to one's personal integrity regarding:

VOCATIONAL - Meaningful Work in Today's Economy

SOCIAL - Relating To And Dealing Constructively With Others (Communication)

PHYSICAL - Attaining and Maintaining Optimal Health And Fitness

EMOTIONAL - Feelings and Coping Strategies That are Appropriate to Reality

INTELLECTUAL - An Increased Fund of Knowledge

MENTAL - An Ability to Solve Problems and Make Decisions With Integrity

SPIRITUAL - Self-Responsible Behaviors consistent with the Eternal Principles of "The Law" (i.e., Torah) as Promulgated by Its Creator

To find out more e-mail me at vhannevig@juno.com.