Is the Republican Party agenda to re-venue by consent?
The following was initially posted on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 and is applicable to mandated "Voter ID Law(s)".
AN OPEN LETTER to PA and FEDERAL LEGISLATORS in OPPOSITION TO GOVERNMENT MANDATED ID: BIOMETRIC and OTHER!
We all know that precedence for obtaining government
identification, whether it’s a passport, driver’s license or “photo”, has
‘always’ included the submission of a completed application and monetary
consideration (i.e., “payment”) to the issuing authority. Therefore, I will
attempt to make known my concerns from three perspectives; the lawful, the legal
and the prophetic, within the parameters of your historical fiduciary duties as
representatives to the people of our nation and the essential characteristics of
indenture contracts; adhesion and unconscionable. But, first, I preface what I
am about to say with the well known, yet to be rebutted, fundamental point of
reference upon which I present lawful, legal and prophetic opposition to the
federal Real ID Act of 2005, or any other such mandated identification that may
be promulgated.
PREFACE
Recent documentaries have revealed that the cost to the owners of the Federal Reserve (those who print the American people’s ‘units of exchange’, i.e., “dollars” or “money”) is approximately $.042 (now $.09) to print a "bill" of any denomination, therefore, when a worker receives $10.00 for his/her labor the owners of the Federal Reserve profit approximately $9.958 ($9.91) just for printing that “bill”. Another +/- $2.00 (20%) Federal Tax is then demanded by agents of the IRS on behalf of those who print the money. As I calculate it, with the present use of these "bills", for each $10.00 of a working man's labor his DEBT to the owners of the Federal Reserve (those who print the money) is approximately $11.96 ($11.91). Should a laborer acquiesce by chip or plastic card (i.e., a likely future use of any “Real [government issued] ID”) to a totally cashless economy, the profits to the owners of the Federal Reserve will increase exponentially! Without consideration for other forms of taxation and interest on loans and mortgages, American men and women will profit those who oversee the manufacturing of the card or chip they must use; approximately $12.00 for every $10.00 of a man's labor! In fact, when you take the time to do the math, you will see that Governor Rendell’s $2.00 per hour increase in the “minimum wage” of Pennsylvanians still kept the affected ‘wage earner’ at “minimum wage” and essentially increased the revenues of the owners of the Federal Reserve (at least) $1.92 ($1.90) per hour, per the tens of thousands of recipients!
Today the people of our nation are at a threshold. Will you, our elected representatives who took an oath to support, obey and defend with fidelity the Pennsylvania and U.S. Constitutions of a “republic” with a democratic process, support, obey and defend with fidelity that Form of government to which you pledge your allegiance and swore your oath; or, Will you, willingly volunteer the people of your nation into a “feudal” form of governance with a communistic “party” process wherein the ‘American dream’ will be based on an optimal form of voluntary indebted servitude to a (relative) ‘handful of men’ who print the money and, at their whim, can pull the proverbial “plug” on an ATM or erase a name from a database? (On a personal note, I can’t help but to suspect that the descendents of our European ancestors who remained in Europe and have a sense of history are laughing at our naivety.)
HISTORY
According to "http://findlaw.com" - "All that is necessary for most contracts to be legally valid are the following two elements:
- All parties are in agreement (after an offer has been made by one party and accepted by the other).
- Something of value has been exchanged, such as cash, services, or goods (or a promise to exchange such an item) for something else of value. "
Therefore, given the binding nature of our freewill participation in contracts, it is disingenuous to believe that the "Charters" (i.e., the ‘corporate contracts’) that were granted to "new world" colonizers (including "William Penn, Esquire, and his heirs and assigns" in 1681 by Charles the Second, Chancellor Heneage, Lord Finch, and their heirs and successors) somehow (miraculously) disappeared in 1776 by a few (relatively speaking) signatures on a “Declaration of Independence”. Or, in 1791 with the ratification of the “Bill of Rights”, i.e., the first 10 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
Indeed, Esquire Penn's obligations to his corporate feudal masters most likely remained in tact and it was simply a matter of business-as-usual for European investors to commission their 'privy councilors' to promulgate the contract law(s) that would continue to govern their global commerce to this day. No doubt that this was, and continues to be, easily done with the blessings of the people who have not yet recognized that their venerated Constitution was written in 'doublespeak'! Since the birth of our nation platitudes like "emancipation", "reconstruction", "reorganization", “war on terror”, etc. have toyed with our emotions and left us vulnerable to proverbial “ravaging wolves in sheep’s clothing”. Have we forgotten that "councilors" still promulgate the laws upon which the courts must act? And that the “privy councilors” became the “Board of Trade and Plantations”? What (now) are they called in the global marketplace? Are they now members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) who are using members of the United States Congress as their brokers to implement the documentation (i.e., the Real ID) that will give them absolute ownership of our physical and intellectual properties?
THE LAWFUL
According to www.FindLaw.com 'the freedom of contract' is "a power or right to contract and freely determine the provisions of contracts without arbitrary or unreasonable legal restrictions esp. as guaranteed under the contract clause of Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution". The Congress of these united States, however, had the power to Amend this Constitution: And they did!
THE LEGAL
With the 13th and 14th Amendments to the original, duly ratified U.S. Constitution of 1791, preparatory steps were taken by Congress to, in a business-as-usual manner, re-venue into the system of government with which they were most comfortable ALL Americans who were willing to alienate (or lien) themselves from their "unalienable Rights" into a statutory form of feudalism. In 1865 the 13th Amendment was crafted with words that allow for 'voluntary servitude' and "punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted". Furthermore, Congress gave themselves the "power to enforce this article (the 13th Amendment; i.e., voluntary servitude) by appropriate legislation". The next step in this re-venuing scheme came in 1868. Complimentary with feudalistic governance and an (oligarchic) party process, Democrat and Republican members of Congress gave to themselves jurisdiction over the descendants of those Americans who voluntarily "ceded" themselves into statutory servitude in a manner consistent with the laws enacted to facilitate an economy based on the principles of “debenture”. With the assistance of the Democrat and Republican members of Congress, a silent (plutocratic) coup incrementally continued in 1913 with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act and the 16th and 17th Amendments, in 1933 with Roosevelt's monetary 'reorganization' (a “New Deal” for his plutocratic cronies), in 1964 with the Civil Rights Act, then with the Coinage Act of 1965 whereby, (according to wikipedia) constitutionally mandated silver was eliminated from the circulating dimes and quarter dollars, and diminished in the half dollar. In addition to the above provisions, for which it is best known, the act:
- Made all coins and currency of the United States (including certain bank issues) a legal tender. This has been taken to reverse the demonetisation of the Trade Dollar, and
- Gave the Secretary (of the Treasury) broad discretion to enter into contracts to assure an adequate supply of clad coins, without regard to public procurement laws.
Fortunately, in Pennsylvania, the crafters of the Pennsylvania Constitution had the foresight to provide remedy to those men and women who would become cognizant of this blatant “bait and switch” fraud and in Article 1, Section 17 provided that; "No ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, or making irrevocable any grant of special privileges or immunities, shall be passed."
THE PROPHETIC
Prophecy, when it comes to pass, is nothing more than the consequences of predictable societal behaviors.
The prophecy found in Rev. 13:16-17 seems consistent with the mandated Real ID AND with the anticipated consequences of the normal behaviors of a statutorily oppressed people who may be “fearful, and unbelieving” (Rev. 21:8).
"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads (i.e., perhaps a ‘mind set’ in the ‘executive functioning’ area of one’s brain?): And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name"
BUT, (if I’m correct in my assessment) there’s another side of this prophecy. It’s found in Rev. 18:11–13:
“And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more: The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, . . . and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.”
Who knows! It may be that all that is needed is a leader with access that encourages and sustains the “courage” of others to come out of an economic bondage of their own making. After all, one would think that a people who have been praying “Thy kingdom come” for 2000 years and have the ability to “bind” and “loose” at will would be more than willing to follow such a leader and collectively shake off their oppressors.
CONCLUSION
In my opinion, the promulgation of the Real ID Act of 2005 is a mere formality to give credible authority to a parallel system of feudal governance that IF ALLOWED will authorize the final death blow to our (previously guaranteed) constitutional republic, and usher in that which “Christians” have feared for two millennia. Truly, I reiterate what I said previously;
Today the people of our nation are at a threshold. Will you, our elected representatives who took an oath to support, obey and defend with fidelity the Pennsylvania and U.S. Constitutions of a “republic” with a democratic process, support, obey and defend with fidelity that Form of government to which you pledge your allegiance and swore your oath; or, Will you, willingly volunteer the people of your nation into a “feudal” form of governance with a communistic “party” process wherein the ‘American dream’ will be based on an optimal form of voluntary indebted servitude to a (relative) ‘handful of men’ who print the money and, at their whim, can pull the proverbial “plug” on an ATM or erase a name from a database?
I can only quote scripture, speak from the objective lessons of History, and share my personal experience with the municipal magistrate’s “prize court”. (Yes, “prize court”. Look it up in the Encyclopedia Britannica.)
My experience* speaks specifically to the issues pertinent to this testimony in opposition to government issued ID that is mandated to be purchased with debt based money; whether it’s this “Real ID” issue currently before the Pennsylvania legislature or any other! Therefore, it is my desire that whatever the members of the Pennsylvania legislature decide to do that they include provisions that will “support, obey and defend” the Constitutional protections provided for men and women, like my self, who choose NOT to apply for commercial benefits and privileges that must be paid for with a debt-based currency, a “legal” fiat “tender” that alienates us from our “unalienable Rights” and causes many to suffer undue ‘pains and penalties’ from court officers who choose to gain political favor by sustaining, what amounts to, treasonous Bills of Attainder.
My personal evaluation of the lawful, legal and prophetic characteristics of the proposed mandated legislation has been from the vantage of a 1960’s era (pre Treasury Department “mercenary”) Navy veteran who took an oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution. I am a woman who believes the "self evident truth" that she "resides" in her "freehold" (i.e., her "self"/”body” whose name is the “title” that “identifies” her) until she returns (at death) to her "domicile" wherein she must give an account to her “Creator”. With that said, ANY application that I would make for a “benefit” and “privilege” with debt based money, i.e., a “unit of exchange” that essentially enslaves the labors of my future generations to the future generations of the mere men who print that money, would violate my Sovereign's Law against "coveting" that “benefit” or “privilege”, and "stealing" to get it! Such are the characteristics and subsequent consequences of the indenture contracts that have been legislated by Democrat and Republican Congressional and State legislators since the Civil War. Clearly, we, the American people have been legislated into a form of mandated statutory feudalism by systemic adhesion and unconscionable contracts with those who print the U.S. currency, our mandated unit of exchange. Our ‘legal tender’ has been monopolized by a global oligarchy of plutocrats whose ultimate goal appears to be the megalomaniacal occupation and distribution of the labors and produce of our global resources; human and otherwise. The councilors who craft and mandate legislation such as the Real ID without which we, the people, are presumed to have no identity and, therefore, no standing in law are the true "terrorist" from whom we, the people, need your legislated defenses and protection. So, I ask: Will you ‘cast out the moneychangers’ and legislate for the people those defenses and protections necessary for us to live our lives with the integrity expected of us by our “Creator”; i.e., the Sovereign to whom we must all (eventually) bow our knee and give an account?
* MY EXPERIENCE
THE REVERSE SIDE OF THE GEORGIA AND NEVADA LICENSES TELL THE STORY AS TO WHY I STOPPED PURCHASING LICENSES. THEY CERTAINLY DID NOT LICENSE ME TO OPERATE A TOYOTA CAMRY THAT SEATS 5. THE PURCHASE OF LICENSE REQUIRED THAT I VIOLATE MY CONSCIOUS AND LIE THAT I AM ENGAGED IN 'INTERSTATE COMMERCE'.
KNOWING THAT I CANNOT 'DRIVE' A COMMERCIALLY REGISTERED VEHICLE UNLESS I HAVE A COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE I CHOSE TO KEEP THE LAW AS I UNDERSTOOD IT AND USE 'THE LAW OF THE FLAG' IN MY TRAVELS.
THE SUBSEQUENT SEIZURE OF WHAT I PERCEIVED TO BE MY PROPERTY AND THE CAPTURE OF A LAWFUL U.S. FLAG SUGGESTS THAT WE HAVE A 'FOREIGN OCCUPYING POWER' IN CONTROL OF OUR NATION’S COURTS. THE POWER APPEARS TO BE THAT OF COMMERCE, AND OUR NATION (IT APPEARS) IS BEING GOVERNED BY AN INTERNATIONAL OLIGARCHY OF PLUTOCRATS WHO MAKE THE LAWS UPON WHICH THE COURTS MUST ACT.
I BROUGHT MY GRIEVANCE ON APPEAL AS A "PETITION FOR REVIEW" OF THIS SUBSTANTIVE CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER THAT INVOLVES ISSUES OF “JURISDICTION”, “TITLE” AND “OWNERSHIP”, AND, ON THE COMMERCIAL SIDE; “AGENCY”, “IDENTITY” AND “OWNERSHIP”.
HERE IS THE ORIGINAL PETITION FOR REVIEW THAT WAS BROUGHT BEFORE THE LACKAWANNA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS AND THE SUPERIOR COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT.
FEEL AT LIBERTY TO REVIEW THE BLOGS AND THE COURT DOCKETS.
PREFACE
Recent documentaries have revealed that the cost to the owners of the Federal Reserve (those who print the American people’s ‘units of exchange’, i.e., “dollars” or “money”) is approximately $.042 (now $.09) to print a "bill" of any denomination, therefore, when a worker receives $10.00 for his/her labor the owners of the Federal Reserve profit approximately $9.958 ($9.91) just for printing that “bill”. Another +/- $2.00 (20%) Federal Tax is then demanded by agents of the IRS on behalf of those who print the money. As I calculate it, with the present use of these "bills", for each $10.00 of a working man's labor his DEBT to the owners of the Federal Reserve (those who print the money) is approximately $11.96 ($11.91). Should a laborer acquiesce by chip or plastic card (i.e., a likely future use of any “Real [government issued] ID”) to a totally cashless economy, the profits to the owners of the Federal Reserve will increase exponentially! Without consideration for other forms of taxation and interest on loans and mortgages, American men and women will profit those who oversee the manufacturing of the card or chip they must use; approximately $12.00 for every $10.00 of a man's labor! In fact, when you take the time to do the math, you will see that Governor Rendell’s $2.00 per hour increase in the “minimum wage” of Pennsylvanians still kept the affected ‘wage earner’ at “minimum wage” and essentially increased the revenues of the owners of the Federal Reserve (at least) $1.92 ($1.90) per hour, per the tens of thousands of recipients!
Today the people of our nation are at a threshold. Will you, our elected representatives who took an oath to support, obey and defend with fidelity the Pennsylvania and U.S. Constitutions of a “republic” with a democratic process, support, obey and defend with fidelity that Form of government to which you pledge your allegiance and swore your oath; or, Will you, willingly volunteer the people of your nation into a “feudal” form of governance with a communistic “party” process wherein the ‘American dream’ will be based on an optimal form of voluntary indebted servitude to a (relative) ‘handful of men’ who print the money and, at their whim, can pull the proverbial “plug” on an ATM or erase a name from a database? (On a personal note, I can’t help but to suspect that the descendents of our European ancestors who remained in Europe and have a sense of history are laughing at our naivety.)
HISTORY
According to "http://findlaw.com" - "All that is necessary for most contracts to be legally valid are the following two elements:
- All parties are in agreement (after an offer has been made by one party and accepted by the other).
- Something of value has been exchanged, such as cash, services, or goods (or a promise to exchange such an item) for something else of value. "
Therefore, given the binding nature of our freewill participation in contracts, it is disingenuous to believe that the "Charters" (i.e., the ‘corporate contracts’) that were granted to "new world" colonizers (including "William Penn, Esquire, and his heirs and assigns" in 1681 by Charles the Second, Chancellor Heneage, Lord Finch, and their heirs and successors) somehow (miraculously) disappeared in 1776 by a few (relatively speaking) signatures on a “Declaration of Independence”. Or, in 1791 with the ratification of the “Bill of Rights”, i.e., the first 10 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
Indeed, Esquire Penn's obligations to his corporate feudal masters most likely remained in tact and it was simply a matter of business-as-usual for European investors to commission their 'privy councilors' to promulgate the contract law(s) that would continue to govern their global commerce to this day. No doubt that this was, and continues to be, easily done with the blessings of the people who have not yet recognized that their venerated Constitution was written in 'doublespeak'! Since the birth of our nation platitudes like "emancipation", "reconstruction", "reorganization", “war on terror”, etc. have toyed with our emotions and left us vulnerable to proverbial “ravaging wolves in sheep’s clothing”. Have we forgotten that "councilors" still promulgate the laws upon which the courts must act? And that the “privy councilors” became the “Board of Trade and Plantations”? What (now) are they called in the global marketplace? Are they now members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) who are using members of the United States Congress as their brokers to implement the documentation (i.e., the Real ID) that will give them absolute ownership of our physical and intellectual properties?
THE LAWFUL
According to www.FindLaw.com 'the freedom of contract' is "a power or right to contract and freely determine the provisions of contracts without arbitrary or unreasonable legal restrictions esp. as guaranteed under the contract clause of Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution". The Congress of these united States, however, had the power to Amend this Constitution: And they did!
THE LEGAL
With the 13th and 14th Amendments to the original, duly ratified U.S. Constitution of 1791, preparatory steps were taken by Congress to, in a business-as-usual manner, re-venue into the system of government with which they were most comfortable ALL Americans who were willing to alienate (or lien) themselves from their "unalienable Rights" into a statutory form of feudalism. In 1865 the 13th Amendment was crafted with words that allow for 'voluntary servitude' and "punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted". Furthermore, Congress gave themselves the "power to enforce this article (the 13th Amendment; i.e., voluntary servitude) by appropriate legislation". The next step in this re-venuing scheme came in 1868. Complimentary with feudalistic governance and an (oligarchic) party process, Democrat and Republican members of Congress gave to themselves jurisdiction over the descendants of those Americans who voluntarily "ceded" themselves into statutory servitude in a manner consistent with the laws enacted to facilitate an economy based on the principles of “debenture”. With the assistance of the Democrat and Republican members of Congress, a silent (plutocratic) coup incrementally continued in 1913 with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act and the 16th and 17th Amendments, in 1933 with Roosevelt's monetary 'reorganization' (a “New Deal” for his plutocratic cronies), in 1964 with the Civil Rights Act, then with the Coinage Act of 1965 whereby, (according to wikipedia) constitutionally mandated silver was eliminated from the circulating dimes and quarter dollars, and diminished in the half dollar. In addition to the above provisions, for which it is best known, the act:
- Made all coins and currency of the United States (including certain bank issues) a legal tender. This has been taken to reverse the demonetisation of the Trade Dollar, and
- Gave the Secretary (of the Treasury) broad discretion to enter into contracts to assure an adequate supply of clad coins, without regard to public procurement laws.
Fortunately, in Pennsylvania, the crafters of the Pennsylvania Constitution had the foresight to provide remedy to those men and women who would become cognizant of this blatant “bait and switch” fraud and in Article 1, Section 17 provided that; "No ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, or making irrevocable any grant of special privileges or immunities, shall be passed."
THE PROPHETIC
Prophecy, when it comes to pass, is nothing more than the consequences of predictable societal behaviors.
The prophecy found in Rev. 13:16-17 seems consistent with the mandated Real ID AND with the anticipated consequences of the normal behaviors of a statutorily oppressed people who may be “fearful, and unbelieving” (Rev. 21:8).
"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads (i.e., perhaps a ‘mind set’ in the ‘executive functioning’ area of one’s brain?): And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name"
BUT, (if I’m correct in my assessment) there’s another side of this prophecy. It’s found in Rev. 18:11–13:
“And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more: The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, . . . and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.”
Who knows! It may be that all that is needed is a leader with access that encourages and sustains the “courage” of others to come out of an economic bondage of their own making. After all, one would think that a people who have been praying “Thy kingdom come” for 2000 years and have the ability to “bind” and “loose” at will would be more than willing to follow such a leader and collectively shake off their oppressors.
CONCLUSION
In my opinion, the promulgation of the Real ID Act of 2005 is a mere formality to give credible authority to a parallel system of feudal governance that IF ALLOWED will authorize the final death blow to our (previously guaranteed) constitutional republic, and usher in that which “Christians” have feared for two millennia. Truly, I reiterate what I said previously;
Today the people of our nation are at a threshold. Will you, our elected representatives who took an oath to support, obey and defend with fidelity the Pennsylvania and U.S. Constitutions of a “republic” with a democratic process, support, obey and defend with fidelity that Form of government to which you pledge your allegiance and swore your oath; or, Will you, willingly volunteer the people of your nation into a “feudal” form of governance with a communistic “party” process wherein the ‘American dream’ will be based on an optimal form of voluntary indebted servitude to a (relative) ‘handful of men’ who print the money and, at their whim, can pull the proverbial “plug” on an ATM or erase a name from a database?
I can only quote scripture, speak from the objective lessons of History, and share my personal experience with the municipal magistrate’s “prize court”. (Yes, “prize court”. Look it up in the Encyclopedia Britannica.)
My experience* speaks specifically to the issues pertinent to this testimony in opposition to government issued ID that is mandated to be purchased with debt based money; whether it’s this “Real ID” issue currently before the Pennsylvania legislature or any other! Therefore, it is my desire that whatever the members of the Pennsylvania legislature decide to do that they include provisions that will “support, obey and defend” the Constitutional protections provided for men and women, like my self, who choose NOT to apply for commercial benefits and privileges that must be paid for with a debt-based currency, a “legal” fiat “tender” that alienates us from our “unalienable Rights” and causes many to suffer undue ‘pains and penalties’ from court officers who choose to gain political favor by sustaining, what amounts to, treasonous Bills of Attainder.
My personal evaluation of the lawful, legal and prophetic characteristics of the proposed mandated legislation has been from the vantage of a 1960’s era (pre Treasury Department “mercenary”) Navy veteran who took an oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution. I am a woman who believes the "self evident truth" that she "resides" in her "freehold" (i.e., her "self"/”body” whose name is the “title” that “identifies” her) until she returns (at death) to her "domicile" wherein she must give an account to her “Creator”. With that said, ANY application that I would make for a “benefit” and “privilege” with debt based money, i.e., a “unit of exchange” that essentially enslaves the labors of my future generations to the future generations of the mere men who print that money, would violate my Sovereign's Law against "coveting" that “benefit” or “privilege”, and "stealing" to get it! Such are the characteristics and subsequent consequences of the indenture contracts that have been legislated by Democrat and Republican Congressional and State legislators since the Civil War. Clearly, we, the American people have been legislated into a form of mandated statutory feudalism by systemic adhesion and unconscionable contracts with those who print the U.S. currency, our mandated unit of exchange. Our ‘legal tender’ has been monopolized by a global oligarchy of plutocrats whose ultimate goal appears to be the megalomaniacal occupation and distribution of the labors and produce of our global resources; human and otherwise. The councilors who craft and mandate legislation such as the Real ID without which we, the people, are presumed to have no identity and, therefore, no standing in law are the true "terrorist" from whom we, the people, need your legislated defenses and protection. So, I ask: Will you ‘cast out the moneychangers’ and legislate for the people those defenses and protections necessary for us to live our lives with the integrity expected of us by our “Creator”; i.e., the Sovereign to whom we must all (eventually) bow our knee and give an account?
* MY EXPERIENCE
THE REVERSE SIDE OF THE GEORGIA AND NEVADA LICENSES TELL THE STORY AS TO WHY I STOPPED PURCHASING LICENSES. THEY CERTAINLY DID NOT LICENSE ME TO OPERATE A TOYOTA CAMRY THAT SEATS 5. THE PURCHASE OF LICENSE REQUIRED THAT I VIOLATE MY CONSCIOUS AND LIE THAT I AM ENGAGED IN 'INTERSTATE COMMERCE'.
KNOWING THAT I CANNOT 'DRIVE' A COMMERCIALLY REGISTERED VEHICLE UNLESS I HAVE A COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE I CHOSE TO KEEP THE LAW AS I UNDERSTOOD IT AND USE 'THE LAW OF THE FLAG' IN MY TRAVELS.
THE SUBSEQUENT SEIZURE OF WHAT I PERCEIVED TO BE MY PROPERTY AND THE CAPTURE OF A LAWFUL U.S. FLAG SUGGESTS THAT WE HAVE A 'FOREIGN OCCUPYING POWER' IN CONTROL OF OUR NATION’S COURTS. THE POWER APPEARS TO BE THAT OF COMMERCE, AND OUR NATION (IT APPEARS) IS BEING GOVERNED BY AN INTERNATIONAL OLIGARCHY OF PLUTOCRATS WHO MAKE THE LAWS UPON WHICH THE COURTS MUST ACT.
I BROUGHT MY GRIEVANCE ON APPEAL AS A "PETITION FOR REVIEW" OF THIS SUBSTANTIVE CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER THAT INVOLVES ISSUES OF “JURISDICTION”, “TITLE” AND “OWNERSHIP”, AND, ON THE COMMERCIAL SIDE; “AGENCY”, “IDENTITY” AND “OWNERSHIP”.
HERE IS THE ORIGINAL PETITION FOR REVIEW THAT WAS BROUGHT BEFORE THE LACKAWANNA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS AND THE SUPERIOR COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT.
FEEL AT LIBERTY TO REVIEW THE BLOGS AND THE COURT DOCKETS.
Wednesday, August 15, 2007
posted by Niki at 11:50 AM
<< Home