Saturday, December 22, 2018

As a juror, presented with this evidence, what will be your decision for your self, your loved ones, your neighbors, friends and your community?

The following contains excerpts from Chapter 3, pages 45-48, of William Guy Carr’s 1958 book, PAWNS in the Game, online at  Paperback pages are 26-31.

For a historical background as to how this is relevant to the many docketed cases in counties nationwide I begin with the following excerpt from Carr’s book, followed by a concisely penned potential problem, and its solution, as that problem was foreseen by those who penned one of the founding documents for an intended form of government.  

“In 1773, when Mayer Rothschild was only thirty years of age, he invited twelve other wealthy and influential men to meet him in Frankfort. His purpose was to convince them that if they agreed to pool their resources they could then finance and control the World Revolutionary Movement and use it as their Manual of Action to win ultimate control of the wealth, natural resources, and man-power of the entire world.”

In 1776, a mere 3 years later, those who assembled in Philadelphia penned the following “unanimous declaration” to, in chess jargon, “checkmate” the outcome.

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to (1) dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and (2) to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should (3) declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

Excerpts of the 25 strategies implied by Carr to be used as a “Manual of Action to win ultimate control of the wealth, natural resources, and man-power of the entire world” begin below.  Some of the excerpts are followed with italicized comments.

1 - The speaker started to unfold the plot by saying that because the majority of men were inclined to evil rather than to good the best results in governing them could be obtained by using violence and terrorism and not by academic discussions. The speaker reasoned that in the beginning human society had been subject to brutal and blind force which was afterwards changed to LAW. He argued that LAW was FORCE only in disguise. He reasoned it was logical to conclude that “By the laws of nature right lies in force”.
LAWS, RULES, EDICTS, ACTS, REGULATIONS, DECREES, etc., are composed of words.  Words have meanings.  In 1785 the word “States” was defined as “Nobility”.
In Webster's Dictionary 1828 - Online Edition the stated word, "States", again, is clearly defined as "Nobility".

The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution, therefore, by definition, reads as follows:
“We the people of the United States Nobility, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States Nobility of America.
2 - He next asserted that political freedom is an idea and not a fact. He stated that in order to usurp political power all that was necessary was to preach ‘Liberalism’ so that the electorate, for the sake of an idea, would yield some of their power and prerogatives which the plotters could then gather together into their own hands. 
During “reconstruction” the 13th Amendment to the United Nobility’s Constitution allowed for the exertion of a means by which voluntary “servitude” would be FORCED by LAWS with which, if one chose not to comply, one may be duly convicted of a crime.

Amendment XIII

Section 1.

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States Nobility, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2.
Congress (“political bands”) shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
3 - The speaker asserted that the Power of Gold had usurped the power of liberal rulers even then, i.e. 1773. He reminded his audience that there had been a time when FAITH had ruled but stated that once FREEDOM had been substituted for FAITH the people did not know how to use it in moderation. He argued that because of this fact it was logical to assume that they could use the idea of FREEDOM to bring about “CLASS WARS”. He pointed out that it was immaterial to the success of HIS plan whether the established governments were destroyed by internal or external foes because the victor had of necessity to seek the aid of ‘Capital’ which “Is entirely in our hands.” 

4 - He argued that the use of any and all means to reach their final goal was justified on the grounds that the ruler who governed by the moral code was not a skilled politician because he left himself vulnerable and in an unstable position on his throne. He said “Those who wish to rule must have recourse to cunning and to make-believe because great national qualities like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics”

Self explanatory.

5 - He asserted “Our right lies in force. The word RIGHT is an abstract thought and proves nothing. I find a new RIGHT ... to attack by the RIGHT of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing  forces of order and regulation, to reconstruct all existing institutions, and to become the sovereign Lord of all those who left to us the RIGHTS to their powers by laying them down voluntarily in their ‘Liberalism’.”
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States' Nobility, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States' Nobility and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States' Nobility; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of (13th Amendment) law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the (13th Amendment) laws.
. . .

Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States' Nobility, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States' Nobility, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5.
The Congress (political bands) shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
6 - He then admonished his listeners with these words “The power of our resources must remain invisible until the very moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning or force can undermine it.” He warned them that any deviation from the Line of the strategical plan he was making known to them would risk bringing to naught “THE LABOURS OF CENTURIES”.

7 - He next advocated the use of ‘Mob Psychology’ to obtain control of the masses. He reasoned that the might of the Mob is blind, senseless, and unreasoning and ever at the mercy of suggestion from any side. He stated “Only a despotic ruler can rule the Mob efficiently because without absolute despotism there can be no existence for civilization which was carried out NOT by the masses, but by their guide, whosoever that person might be.” He warned “The moment the Mob seizes FREEDOM in its hands it quickly turns to anarchy.”
Slogans from “ancient times” include and are not limited to translated penned and typeset scriptures.  For instance, consider what may be the Hebrew root word for the word “masses” as implied to have been used by Rothschild.

Excerpted from

Strong's Hebrew Lexicon Number-  H4522 מס מס - מס מס - mas mis - mas, mees
From H4549; properly a burden (as causing to faint), that is, a tax in the form of forced labor
KJV Usage: discomfited, levy, task [-master], tribute (-tary).

Brown-Driver-Briggs' Hebrew Definitions - מס מס
1. gang or body of forced labourers, task-workers, labour band or gang, forced service, task-work, serfdom, tributary, tribute, levy, taskmasters, discomfited
a. labour-band, labour-gang, slave gang
b. gang-overseers
c. forced service, serfdom, tribute, enforced payment

Origin: from H4549
8 - He next advocated that the use of alcoholic liquors, drugs, moral corruption, and all forms of vice, be used systematically by their “Agenturs” to corrupt the morals of the youth of the nations. He recommended that the special ‘Agenturs’ should be trained as tutors, lackeys, governesses, clerks and by our women in the places of dissipation frequented by the Goyim. He added “In the number of these last I count also the so-called society ladies who become voluntary followers of the others in corruption and luxury. We must not stop at bribery, deceit, and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end.”
Consider the Counterculture of the 1960s and its effects on society. -
9 - Turning to politics he claimed they had the RIGHT to seize property by any means, and without hesitation, if by doing so they secured submission, and sovereignty. He pronounced “Our STATE marching along the path of peaceful conquest has the RIGHT to replace the horrors of wars by less noticeable and more satisfactory sentences of death necessary to maintain the ‘terror’ which tends to produce blind submission.” 

10 - Dealing with the use of slogans he said “In ancient times we were the first to put the words ‘Liberty’, ‘Equality’ and ‘Fraternity’ into the mouths of the masses ... words repeated to this day by stupid pollparrots; words which the would-be wise men of the Goyim could make nothing of in their abstractness, and did not note the contradiction of their meaning and interrelation.” He claimed the words brought under their directions and control ‘legions’ “Who bore our banners with enthusiasm.” He reasoned that there is no place in nature for ‘Equality’, ‘Liberty’ or ‘Fraternity’. He said “On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the Goyim we have set up the aristocracy of MONEY. The qualification for this aristocracy is WEALTH which is dependent upon us.”

(*// This would suppose that the speaker felt that hereditary aristocracy is a natural development (societal evolution) and is a blessing; and that the gift of statecraft is perpetually passed on from father to son. Was it really his opinion, or was it just visited upon him (after the fact) by the writer of these ‘original documents’ who seems to be in favour of feudalism?)
From - Brown-Driver-Briggs' Hebrew Definitions – Goyim - גּי גּוי - n m
1. nation, people
a. nation, people
1. usually of non-Hebrew people
2. of descendants of Abraham
3. of Israel
b. of swarm of locusts, other animals (fig.) n pr m
c. Goyim? = "nations"
Origin: apparently from the same root as H1465
11 - He next expounded his theories regarding war. In 1773 he set down a principle which the governments of Britain and the United States publicly announced as their joint policy in 1939. He said it should be the policy of those present to foment wars but to direct the peace conferences so that neither of the combatants obtained territorial gains. He said the wars should be directed so that the nations engaged on both sides would be placed further in their debt, and in the power of ‘Our’ Agenturs.

12 - He next dealt with administration. He told those present that they must use their wealth to have candidates chosen for public office who would be “servile and obedient to our commands, so they may readily be used as Pawns in our game by the learned and genious men we will appoint to operate behind the scenes of government as official advisers.” He added “The men we appoint as ‘Advisers’ will have been bred, reared, and trained from childhood in accordance with our ideas to rule the affairs of the whole world.”

13 - He dealt with propaganda, and explained how their combined wealth could control all outlets of public information while they remained in the shade and clear of blame regardless of what the repercussions might be due to the publication of libels, slanders, or untruths. The speaker said “Thanks to the Press we have got gold in our hands notwithstanding the fact that we had to gather it out of the oceans of blood and tears... But it has paid us even though we have sacrificed many of our own people. Each victim on our side is worth a thousand Goyim.”
Twenty Years of Media Consolidation Has Not Been Good For Our Democracy - The media has become controlled by a handful of corporations thanks to the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Excerpt from By Michael Corcoran | March 30, 2016 -

Excerpt:  “ . . . President Bill Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The act, signed into law on February 8, 1996, was “essentially bought and paid for by corporate media lobbies,” as Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) described it, and radically “opened the floodgates on mergers.”

“The negative impact of the law cannot be overstated. The law, which was the first major reform of telecommunications policy since 1934, according to media scholar Robert McChesney, “is widely considered to be one of the three or four most important federal laws of this generation.” The act dramatically reduced important Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations on cross ownership, and allowed giant corporations to buy up thousands of media outlets across the country, increasing their monopoly on the flow of information in the United States and around the world.”
14 - He next explained the necessity of having their ‘Agentur’ always come out into the open, and appear on the scene, when conditions had reached their lowest ebb, and the masses had been subjugated by means of want and terror. He pointed out that when it was time to restore order they should do it in such a way that the victims would believe they had been the prey of criminals and irresponsibles. He said “By executing the criminals and lunatics after they have carried out our preconceived ‘reign of terror’, we can make ourselves appear as the saviours of the oppressed, and the champions of the workers.” The speaker then added “We are interested in just the opposite ... in the diminution, the killing out of the Goyim.”
Definitions of Agentur (with inserted questions) – n; an administrative unit of government (MUNICIPALITY AUTHORITIES?), a unit with administrative responsibilities (BOARDS?), a business that serves other businesses  (a MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY?), a commercial or industrial enterprise and the people who constitute it (28 USC 3002(15) LEGISLATORS?).


(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.

For an example of how “Agenturs” operate, see Psychological Aspects of Undue Influence by Ira Daniel Turkat+ - JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2003; PROBATE & PROPERTY

Excerpt:  “Although many pathways lead to undue influence, a simple model can be constructed to understand its genesis by considering three classes of variables. These are

1. predisposing factors,
2. vulnerability enhancers, and
3. execution variables.

Simply put, certain characteristics make an individual susceptible to being manipulated (predisposing factors), that if nurtured “properly” (vulnerability enhancers) are likely to produce the desired outcome (execution variables). To understand the development of undue influence, how these factors operate, interact, and overlap must be considered.” 
15 - He next explained how industrial depressions and financial panics could be brought about and used to serve their purpose saying “En forced unemployment and hunger, imposed on the masses because of the power we have to create shortages of food, will create the right of Capital to rule more surely than it was given to the real aristocracy, and by the legal authority of Kings.” He claimed that by having their Agentur control the ‘Mob’, the ‘Mob’ could then be used to wipe out all who dared to stand in their way.
The United Nobility removed silver from their Article 1 § 10 constitutional coin circa 1965 and, shortly thereafter, enlisted their own, by definition, Mercenary Force, the employees of which are tendered with currency backed by foreign coin, and obligated to take on the activities of a ‘Mob’ that could “be used to wipe out all who dared to stand in their way”.

The following is excerpted from the RAND CORPORATION article; The Evolution of the All-Volunteer Force by Bernard Rostker -

Why Did the United States Move to an All-Volunteer Force (AVF)?

Although the country had conscripted its armed forces for only 35 of its 228 years — nearly all in the 20th century — the American people were generally willing to accept this practice when service was perceived as universal. However, in the 1960s, that acceptance began to erode. There were five major reasons:

• Demographics. The size of the eligible population of young men reaching draft age each year was so large and the needs of the military so small in comparison that, in practice, the draft was no longer universal.

• Cost. Obtaining enough volunteers was possible at acceptable budget levels.

• Moral and economic rationale. Conservatives and libertarians argued that the state had no right to impose military service on young men without their consent. Liberals asserted that the draft placed unfair burdens on the underprivileged members of society, who were less likely to get deferments.

• Opposition to the war in Vietnam. The growing unpopularity of the Vietnam war meant the country was ripe for a change to a volunteer force.

• The U.S. Army’s desire for change. The Army had lost confidence in the draft as discipline problems among draftees mounted in Vietnam.

These views were reinforced by the findings of the Gates Commission, set up in 1969 by President Richard Nixon to advise him on establishing an all-volunteer force. The commission addressed key military-manpower issues, including supply and demand, attrition and retention, and the mix of career and noncareer members in the context of management efficiency and personal equity. It concluded that the nation’s interests would be better served by an all-volunteer force than by a combination of volunteers and conscripts. In 1971, President Nixon signed a new law to end the draft and put the selective service structure on standby. After a two-year extension of induction authority, the end of the draft was formally announced in January 1973.
16 - The infiltration into continental Freemasonry was next discussed extensively. The speaker stated that their purpose would be to take advantage of the facilities and secrecy Freemasonry had to offer. He pointed out that they could organize their own Grand Orient Lodges within Blue Freemasonry in order to carry on their subversive activities and hide the true nature of their work under the cloak of philanthropy. He stated that all members initiated into their Grand Orient Lodges should be used for proselytizing purposes and for spreading their atheistic materialistic ideology amongst the Goyim. He ended this phase of the discussion with the words. “When the hour strikes for our sovereign Lord of all the World to be crowned these same hands will sweep away everything that might stand in his way.” . . .
Consider how Agenturs for the United Nobility’s “posterity” may have set up a plan to profit from the mandated insurance and “Affordable Health Care” of DNA specific “Goyim”.  Will, “When the hour strikes for our sovereign Lord of all the World to be crowned these same hands will sweep away everything that might stand in his way” include the extermination of all “the seed of Abraham”?

Galatians 3 (ISR) (15)  Brothers, as a man I say it: a covenant, even though it is man’s, yet if it is confirmed, no one sets it aside, or adds to it.  (16)  But the promises were spoken to Aḇraham, and to his Seed. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as of many, but as of one, “And to your Seed,” who is Messiah.  
17 - He next expounded the value of systematic deceptions, pointing out that their Agentur should be trained in the use of high sounding phrases, and the use of popular slogans. They should make the masses the most lavish of promises. He observed “The opposite of what has been promised can always be done afterwards ... that is of no consequence.” He reasoned that by using such words as Freedom and Liberty, the Goyim could be stirred up to such a pitch of patriotic fervour that they could be made to fight even against the laws of God, and Nature. He added “And for this reason after we obtain control the very NAME OF GOD will be erased from the ‘Lexicon of life’.”

18 - He then detailed the plans for revolutionary war; the art of street fighting; and outlined the pattern for the ‘Reign of Terror’ which he insisted must accompany every revolutionary effort “Because it is the most economical way to bring the population to speedy subjection.”

19 - Diplomacy was next discussed. After all wars secret diplomacy must be insisted upon “in order that our Agentur, masquerading as ‘poltitical’, ‘Financial’, and ‘Economic’ advisers, can carry out our mandates without fear of exposing who are ‘The Secret Power’ behind national and international affairs.” The speaker then told those present that by secret diplomacy they must obtain such control “that the nations cannot come to even an inconsiderable private agreement without our secret agents having a hand in it.”

20 - Ultimate world government the goal. To reach this goal the speaker told them “It will be necessary to establish huge monopolies, reservoirs of such colossal riches, that even the largest fortunes of the Goyim will depend on us to such an extent that they will go to the bottom together with the credit of their governments ON THE DAY AFTER THE GREAT POLITICAL SMASH.” The speaker then added “You gentlemen here present who are economists just strike an estimate of the significance of this combination.”

21 - Economic war. Plans to rob the Goyim of their landed properties and industries were then discussed. A combination of high taxes, and unfair competition was advocated to bring about the economic ruin of the Goyim as far as their national financial interests and investments were concerned. In the international field he felt they could be encouraged to price themselves out of the markets. This could be achieved by the careful control of raw materials, organized agitation amongst the workers for shorter hours and higher pay, and by subsidizing competitors. The speaker warned his co-conspirators that they must arrange matters, and control conditions, so that “the increased wages obtained by the workers will not benefit them in any way.”
Who profits when wages are increased?  Is it the worker or, is it the person(s) who print the notes by which the worker is tendered and required to pay taxes on the note’s face value?  See Cost of Printing -
22 - Armaments. It was suggested that the building up of armaments for the purpose of making the Goyim destroy each other should be launched on such a colossal scale that in the final analysis “there will only be the masses of the proletariat left in the world, with a few millionaires devoted to our cause ... and police, and soldiers sufficient to protect our interests.”

23 - The New Order. The members of the One World Government would be appointed by the Dictator. He would pick men from amongst the scientists, the economists, the financiers, the industrialists, and from the millionaires because “in substance everything will be settled by the question of figures.”

24 - Importance of youth. The importance of capturing the interest of youth was emphasized with the admonition that “Our Agenturs should infiltrate into all classes, and levels of society and government, for the purpose of fooling, bemusing, and corrupting the younger members of society by teaching them theories and principles we know to be false.”
Proverbs 30:14  There is a generation whose teeth are swords, And whose jaw-teeth are knives, To devour the poor from off the earth, And the needy from among men.
25 - National and International Laws should not be changed but should be used as they are, to destroy the civilization of the Goyim “merely by twisting them into a contradiction of the interpretation which first masks the law and afterwards hides it altogether. Our ultimate aim is to substitute ARBITRATION for LAW.”


Subchap   Rule

The provisions of this Chapter 1300 adopted March 16, 1981, effective May 15, 1981, 11 Pa.B. 1078, unless otherwise noted.
(Editor’s Note: Chapter 1300 reorganized at 36 Pa.B. 693 (February 11, 2006).)
As a juror presented with this evidence, what is your decision for your self, your loved ones, your neighbors, your friends and your community?

Thursday, March 08, 2018


In the beginning, the words were clearly "stated".

See Johnson's 1755 Dictionary of the English Language.


Who "guaranteed" to whom "a Republican Form of government"?

U.S. Constitution › Article IV§4

In Johnson’s 1785 and 1830 Dictionaries of the English Language the stated words; "state" and "States" were clearly defined. 

In Webster's Dictionary 1828 - Online Edition the stated word, "States", again, is clearly defined as "Nobility".

Therefore, the Preamble to the United States Constitution clearly reads as the stated words were intended to be read by the people, their posterity, their Solicitors, and their Esquires.

And, in Johnson’s 1755 and 1785 Dictionaries of the English Language, the duties of an "Esquire" are clearly defined.