Father Nathan Monk at Pensacola City Council

The Roger Sherman Institute: Fundamentals of Economics

Check out the facts and become an informed activist.

Sign up for cyber classes at Sherman Institute.

Course #97 - Fundamentals of Economics from Aaron Bolinger on Vimeo.

Up close and personal with George Knapp

Who owns your home?

Thrive

About global domination . . . A movie . . .

Sodom and Gomorrah revisited

Why must the American people re-learn the lessons of history?

Here is an excerpt from Chapter 19 of the ancient Book of Jasher. In this account you will find that it was the decisions of "four judges" (not homosexuality) that gave a bad name to the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah.

31 And Paltith daughter of Lot went forth that day to fetch water, and she put bread into her pitcher of water, and she went to draw water by the poor man's place, and she took out the bread from the pitcher and gave it to the poor man and he ate it.

32 And the three men saw what Paltith did to the poor man, and they said to her, It is thou then who hast supported him, and therefore has he not starved, nor changed in appearance nor died like the rest.

33 And the three men went out of the place in which they were concealed, and they seized Paltith and the bread which was in the poor man's hand.

34 And they took Paltith and brought her before their judges, and they said to them, Thus did she do, and it is she who supplied the poor man with bread, therefore did he not die all this time; now therefore declare to us the punishment due to this woman for having transgressed our law.

35 And the people of Sodom and Gomorrah assembled and kindled a fire in the street of the city, and they took the woman and cast her into the fire and she was burned to ashes.

The Toronto 9/11 Hearings - 9/11/11

Era of Love & Peace (man known as Vic Beck)

More at:  FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES and THE LETTER OF THE LAW.

How To Take Our Country Back (full video)

Jury Power

Total Proof of the New World Order

YADA . . . Yada . . . yada . . .

What was the "Original Sin"?

We seem to have forgotten that ALL law is contractual.

Even at the beginning, Yahweh Elohim gave contractual stipulations to the man, Adam, and the woman, Eve, in the care of their freehold.

Yahweh told them they could eat of the fruit of the trees with the exclusion of one.

When the serpent came around (consider the serpent as a feudal master, mafia Don, or Corporation sole) the serpent made an "offer", the Eve and Adam "accepted" the offer, and the fruit of the excluded tree (which, incidentally, did not belong to the serpent) was the "consideration" that sealed their contract.

In their "acceptance" of the serpent's contract our ancestors literally "sold the farm"!

HOWEVER; Since there is no longer "lawful" money - it's been debt-based since the mid to late 60s - and our "unalienable" economic and property Rights have been brokered into bond contracts ALL contracts, real and implied, have become "adhesive".  Furthermore, ALL these contracts are "unconscionable" in that they require debt-based monetary consideration for which we are the surety. This is Peonage and peonage is illegal!  Such unconscionable contracts include and are not limited to; birth-certificates, marriage and driver's licenses, real-estate transactions, and tithes and offerings . . . .

David said in Psalm 110 that there WILL be a remnant who volunteer when the time is right.

Could "NOW" be the time?

Isn't it time we stop contracting with the devil, a "corporation sole", and dissolve the authorities, commissions, etc. that are wasting the assets of our freehold and presuming their rulership over us?

Is it enough to say "Yada . . . yada . . . yada . . ." when these questions are raised?

For your consideration: An alternative cure for "dis-ease".

"Sound Money" Economic Summit

On Feb 7th and 8th, 2011, the South Carolina Sound Money Committee conducted an “Economics Summit” in Columbia. Presenters at this summit included; Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Dr. Larry Parks, Aaron Bolinger, and Geoff Turk.

The National Veterans Committee on Constitutional Affairs (NVCCA) assembled a collection of educational videos for members of the general public and state legislators to help them understand both the scope of the problem, and what our states can do to effect positive change. Although some of this material is “South Carolina specific,” the principles and concepts can be applied to any of our nation's union of 50 states.

Have a note pad handy – the subject matter contained is DEEP, including constitutional legal research.

Aaron Biblical Presentation 2 (912) from ethan graham on Vimeo.

Do the men and women of our nation enjoy "Human Rights" protections and defenses? If so, from whom?

On  May 10, 2011 Flavia Krause-Jackson of Bloomberg News posted to Bloomberg.com a report:  U.S. Pushes China on Human Rights Record at the Risk of Upsetting ‘Friend’.

In the Bloomberg report Krause-Jackson quoted Vice President Joe Biden as saying:

" . . . the U.S. administration believes “strongly” that protecting human rights “is the best way to promote long-term stability and prosperity of any society.” "

So:

For what reason was "Disability Rights Protesters Arrested in DC" on May 2, 2011?

How is it that "the U.S. (28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)) administration" turns 'a blind eye' to the most blatant Human Rights abuse that is being perpetrated and perpetuated by the men and women within their own corporate jurisdiction?

Why was the following report not filed by an American reporter?

On Monday, May 9, 2011 Mike Kellerman, a Washington DC reporter with Iran's US edition of PressTV posted his video, Elder abuse, neglect rampant in US, and the following report titled:

They are a small but growing movement called the National Association to stop Guardian Abuse.

They say the disabled and elderly are Being prayed upon by the legal system, by crooked lawyers and courts Who they say scam millions of dollars by having older people declared Guardians of the courts depriving them and their families of their rights and taking their assets.

Protesting in front of the Justice Department, they met with a few members of Congress demanding something be done.

With millions Of baby boomers turning into senior citizens now, they're warning that Billions of dollars will be stolen from the elderly and their families By probate courts which they are claiming conspire with lawyers and state agencies like adult services to rob older people of their homes and Savings often declaring them without proper evidence, incompetent to handle their own financial affairs.

It's a big business they say, lawyers getting rich…

Its an assault on the elderly and their golden years says the group Citing case after case of the judicial system collaborating to put elderly Or disable people in a conservatorship status with the courts giving The lawyers and courts , without family having a say, complete control over an elderly person's life savings.

With the aging of the US population in record numbers over the next5 years, the baby boomers, they say that unless what they call a corrupt system is fixed, millions will be robbed of all they own by unscrupulous lawyers, social workers, corrupt probate courts, and the state agencies who are supposed to be protecting the elderly, not abusing them.

Are "Law Enforcers" and "Law makers" being manipulated by so called "investors" to statutiorly achieve their ultimate megalomaniacal authority over all peoples and nations?

Should the corporate United States and the State of Pennsylvania be dissolved?

UNITED STATES CODE provides the legal definition of "State" and "United States" in 28USC3002:

(14) ``State'' means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.

(15) ``United States'' means--

          (A) a Federal corporation;

          (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or

          (C) an instrumentality of the United States.

On page 31 of "CURRENT EVENTS", the "Condensed Weekly Newspapers that were used by Teachers in Public and Private Schools" during the 1932 - 1933 school term indoctrinated future generations of Americans to accept a corporate business model of governance.

Because anything other than full disclosure of the nature of a contract is illegal, fraudulent and unethical; and the etiology of a corporate structure of governance had not been fully disclosed (see BUSINESS-AS-USUAL STRATEGIES FOR PROTECTING "THE CROWN" INVESTORS and their GLOBAL ANONYMITY) to its share and stock holders; and the acts of its directors and those in control have become illegal, oppressive and fraudulent; and, its assets have been misapplied and wasted, should not the corporation’s unhappy stock/shareholders have recourse to dissolution?

From 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1981:

(a) General rule.--Upon application filed by a shareholder or director of a business corporation, the court may entertain proceedings for the involuntary winding up and dissolution of the corporation when any one of the following is made to appear:

(1) The acts of the directors, or those in control of the corporation, are illegal, oppressive or fraudulent and that it is beneficial to the interests of the shareholders that the corporation be wound up and dissolved.

(2) The corporate assets are being misapplied or wasted and that it is beneficial to the interests of the shareholders that the corporation be wound up and dissolved.

(3) The directors are deadlocked in the direction of the management of the business and affairs of the corporation and the shareholders are unable to break the deadlock and that irreparable injury to the corporation is being suffered or is threatened by reason thereof. The court shall not appoint a receiver or grant other similar relief under this paragraph if the shareholders by agreement or otherwise have provided for the appointment of a provisional director or other means for the resolution of a deadlock but the court shall enforce the remedy so provided if appropriate.

Should the corporate United States and the State of Pennsylvania be dissolved? Here are examples of how some shareholders view the management of the business affairs of these 28 USC 3002 corporations.

REPUBLICANS

DEMOCRATS

Dumbing Down the Nation Through Education

Jury found "kids for cash" judge Mark Ciavarella guilty of racketeering and conspiracy

The defense and prosecution both declared victory after Mark A. Ciavarella Jr. was found guilty on 12 counts and acquitted of 27 Friday, but the former Luzerne County Juvenile Court judge, who would have spent less than seven years in prison under a plea agreement that collapsed in 2009, now faces 13 to 15 years.

A jury in U.S. District Court found Mr. Ciavarella guilty of racketeering and conspiracy for accepting $997,600 from wealthy developer Robert K. Mericle. Mr. Mericle testified he won a contract to build a for-profit juvenile detention center after a referral from Mr. Ciavarella.  Read more:

"PERSON" POWER: WHO'S IN CONTROL?

Regarding Unz & Co.

Unz & Co. has been setting the standard for compliance products and services since 1879.   What is Unz & Company's relationship to the 28 USC 3002 (15) United States Corporation?  What is Unz & Company's relationship to the 28 USC 3002 (14) State?

Some key terms from the Unz & Co. glossary are:

Harmonized System - Schedule of tariff nomenclature arranged in 6 digit codes allowing all participating countries to classify traded goods on a common basis. Beyond the 6 digit level, countries are free to introduce national distinctions for tariff or statistical purposes. This system will replace the Tariff Schedule of the United States (TSUS). The Harmonized System was implemented by the United States and other major GATT countries after Jan, 1. 1988. Additional countries are expected to be implementing the system subsequent to that date.

HTSUSA - Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the U.S. Annotated. The U.S. application of the Harmonized System for the classification of imported merchandise. The U.S. adheres to the international classification system to the six digit level and then adds four addition digits for rate of duty assignment and statistical purposes.

Marking (or marks) - Letters, numbers, and other symbols placed on cargo packages to facilitate identification.

Schedule B - Refers to Schedule B, Statistical Classification of Domestic and Foreign Commodities Exported from the United States . All commodities exported from the United States must be assigned a ten-digit Schedule B number. Note: the first 6 digits of the Schedule B number are harmonized.

Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) - Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), Department of the Treasury, implements and enforces financial and trade sanctions. FAC has the authority to include within the definition of the sanctioned government those individuals and entities that FAC has determined are owned by, controlled by, or acting directly or indirectly on behalf of the target government. Parties so identified are known as Specially Designated Nationals or SDNs. In practice, an SDN is a target government body, representative, intermediary, or front (whether overt or covert) that usually is located in a third country and functions as an extension of the sanctioned government. An SDN may also be a third-party company that otherwise becomes owned or controlled by the target government or that operates on its behalf. No criminal linkage is necessary. Ownership by, control by, acting on behalf of, or profiting from trade with the target government or country would suffice to qualify a person for designation.

Unz & Company's Mission Statement advises:

Our mission is to provide fully compliant, timely products and services to U.S. companies that are involved in international trade or the transportation of dangerous goods. We will be the most informed and informative company in our field, and make full compliance available to every company regardless of size, through training, systems, or forms.

Our value will be found in the knowledge that Unz & Co. will serve as your source for compliance expertise, allowing you to maintain your focus on your core business.

Therefore, given the above information, I ask:

What Form of Government has the United States?  And,

Is there an undisclosed purpose for legislating government mandated identification? 

You decide.

Have the American people been the unknowing victims of TREASONOUS FRAUD?

How important is an Oath of Office?

Were you, or are you now, in the U.S. military?  Were you told that the U.S. or State you served was defined under Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002 (14)(15)?

(14) “State” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.

(15) “United States” means—

  (A) a Federal corporation;

  (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or

  (C) an instrumentality of the United States.

If you believe you've been a victim of a seditious or treasonous fraud your remedy may be found in the verbage of Title 8 U.S.C. § 1481(b):

(b) Whenever the loss of United States nationality is put in issue in any action or proceeding commenced on or after September 26, 1961 under, or by virtue of, the provisions of this chapter or any other Act, the burden shall be upon the person or party claiming that such loss occurred, to establish such claim by a preponderance of the evidence. Any person who commits or performs, or who has committed or performed, any act of expatriation under the provisions of this chapter or any other Act shall be presumed to have done so voluntarily, but such presumption may be rebutted upon a showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the act or acts committed or performed were not done voluntarily.

What is you plan?

William Pawelec Interview

About "False Flag" events.

Treason, sedition, and subversive activities

Are police officers of your local corporate municipality willing participants in a "seditious conspiracy" to overthrow our guaranteed "republican Form of government"?

The Bailout Money and Why You Dont have to Pay Your Mortgage 1/4

Why aren't the Governors' of the several states protecting us from lies and theft?

Perhaps a deliberated document in the nature of a 'Bill of Indictment' needs to be presented to the Governors of each of the several states. Then, maybe, the governors of the several states will do the right thing by and for the people and order their State's militia to execute justice on 'Wall Street fraudsters' who are operating in their State AND on treasonous judges who willingly protect the fraudsters and their own BAR associates' criminal enterprise.

BUSINESS-AS-USUAL STRATEGIES FOR PROTECTING "THE CROWN" INVESTORS and their GLOBAL ANONYMITY

In the beginning "The Crown", a "corporation sole" established investment interests in the American colonies.

Origins - The concept of the Crown took form under the feudal system, evolving from and synthesising oriental and barbarian concepts of kingship. Under the feudal system, in England and (separately) Scotland, all rights and privileges were ultimately granted by the ruler (though this was not the case in all countries that had this system). All land was granted by the Crown to lords, in exchange for feudal services, and they in turn granted the land to lesser lords. One exception to this was common socage—owners of land held as socage held it subject only to the Crown. The Crown as ultimate owner of all property also owns any property which has become bona vacantia.

When a relative few of the early colonist declared their independence, the investors didn't argue, the investors compromised. The investors put their hirelings in places whereby they could promulgate and enact the laws upon which their statutorily established courts would act (see History 1450-1789: Navigation Acts). The following is an example of how corporate governance would be "statutorily" erected as a "Crown Entity" within a commonwealth (or anyplace within these united states of America "by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress" - see Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution). The example that follows shows that corporate governance was erected in the capitol city of Kingston, Jamaica, in 1803.

The erection of a corporate UNITED STATES (see: U.S.C. Title 28 § 3002 (15) “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the United States) and all its appellations therefrom appears to have started with the incorporation of Philadelphia on March 11, 1789 (Recorded L. B. No. 3, p. 455 See the Acts of Assembly passed December 9, 1789, Chapter 1479; April 2, 1790, Chapter 1509; March 8, 1792, Chapter 1665;  April 19, 1794, Chapter 1754; April 4, 1796, Chapter 1905; April 11, 1799, Chapter 2091; March 3, 1800, Chapter 2117) and further confirmed by the "Gettysburg Address in 1864, and the Incorporation of District of Columbia by (Presidential) Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, under the Emergency War Powers Act and the Reconstruction Acts" (reorganized June 11, 1878 --16 Stat. 419 Chapter 62).  

"The Crown" has its Treasury", and "The Treasury" has its agenda for stakeholders in "Crown Entities".

What is a Crown Entity? - Crown entities are bodies established by law in which the Government has a controlling interest - for example, by owning a majority of the voting shares or through having the power to appoint and replace a majority of the governing members - but which are legally separate from the Crown.
Section 7 of the Crown Entities Act 2004 outlines the five categories of Crown entity:
Statutory entities - bodies corporate established through legislation;
Crown entity companies - often previously known as Crown-owned companies;
Crown entity subsidiaries - companies that are controlled by Crown entities;
School boards of trustees - as constituted under the Education Act 1989; and
Tertiary education institutes - polytechnics, universities and wananga.

Treasury hirelings develop rhetoric and protocol to assure the success of their global agenda.

Corporate Social Responsibility: Dealing With Political Exposure

View more presentations from Competitive enterprise Institute.

(Who is Competitive Enterprise?

Location: Washington, United States
Work: Policy Research Organization at Competitive Enterprise Institute
About: CEI is a non-profit public policy organization dedicated to advancing the principles of free enterprise and limited government. )

So, if the agenda of "The Crown" and its "Treasury" is to protect and defend the financial interests and statutory schemes of its proprietary investors,

then who is representing our interests?

Who do we, the people, turn to to defend and protect our interests and investments?

See also:

The U.S. Constitution, Article 1 § 8, Clause 4. The Congress shall have Power * * * To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States - NATURALIZATION AND CITIZENSHIP, and

A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates, 1774 - 1875

Is "legislator" doublespeak for "broker"?

Are the children of our nation born free? Or, have Democrat and Republican Legislators brokered them into debt servitude to an oligarchy of global bankers and investors?

http://www.cspan.org/

June 23, 2010 - 1:15

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/29 ... hr 3:00 -

Canadian Rob Menard Explains "REMITTANCE"

At http://www.answers.com/ Remittance is defined in various Dictionaries and Encyclopedia.   From that website, on this date, the following text is how "remittance" is defined.   As you watch Menard's video, keep in mind that the billing agency may never fully disclose that to 'remove an obligation' there are other lawful choices.   I have embolden in blue (and it shows in purple) those choices.

Investment:  The process of sending money to remove an obligation. This is most often done through an electronic network, wire transfer or mail. The term also refers to the amount of money being sent to remove the obligation.

Investopedia Says:

When a person sends a check to the government to pay for a tax bill, the check is remittance to remove the tax obligation. If you were to send money to a friend in Europe through a wire-transfer service, the sum of the payment is the remittance.

Banking:  1. Payment toward satisfaction of a debt, whether in cash or cash equivalents, such as checks, drafts, and other negotiable instruments.

2. Payment on an installment loan or open-end credit account, forwarded through the mail to a Lock Box along with a remittance document, a machine readable billing document encoded with the customer's account number, and the amount due, plus any late charges, if the loan payment is delinquent.

3. Proceeds from a check submitted to another bank for Collection.

Law Encylcopedia:  Money sent from one individual to another in the form of cash, check, or some other manner.

Financial statements sent by a creditor to a debtor frequently refer to the process of submitting a monthly remittance.

See The World Freeman Society for common sense tips as to how you can demand 'honest services' from your government and its employees.  

Anything less than 'honest service' is unethical and a breach of fiduciary duty on their part (and ours).

WHAT IS "INTEGRITY"?

"What's wrong with this picture?"

How is it that a "federal judge" would determine "that Hispanics were being treated unfairly"  and allow them "to flip the lever six times for one (presumably Democrat or Republican Party) candidate", while Minor Party and Independent Candidate Constitutional Lawsuits are Pending in 21 States just to obtain ballot access?

What can be done? 

Voters in Fremont, Nebraska found a solution.  They put the illegal immigration issue on their ballot.

World Economies: The Next Step

Here's a spoof on the truth of the matter:

So what is the next step?

Consider this April 19, 1937 article about how bonds are monetized.

Then watch Dominique Strauss-Kahn as he describes IMF plans to monetize "bonds" in IMF currency to attendees at the National Press Club on April 16, 2009.   This segment is at +/- 00:33:00 of the video.

"TERRORISM": Who benefits?

How is it that employees of the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue can make terroristic threats on their employers (i.e., Pennsylvania property owners) with impunity?

Have you ever thought about why dis-ease has become so prevelant in our united states?

Do you know how the FBI defines Organized Crime, Criminal Enterprise and Racketeering?

How do you respond to threats?

How do you suppose those who have been benefiting from your belief in their fear (False Evidence Appearing Real) tactics will respond when they realize that you know their name and where to find them?

What will be their individual and collective "defense mechanism"?

What will be yours?

Dictionary definition: Defense Mechanism

1.  Biology. A physiological reaction of an organism used in self-protection, as against infection.

2.  Psychology. Any of various usually unconscious mental processes, including denial, projection, rationalization, and repression, that protect the ego from shame, anxiety, conflict, loss of self-esteem, or other unacceptable feelings or thoughts.

Do you believe "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's GOD" to which you're entitled by the "Declaration of Independence" are there for your benefit?

Do you feel good about your self?

Do you feel good about others?

Are you able - and willing - to meet the demands of life?

What will you choose to do? 

How will you choose to use the talent(s) with which you were endowed?

Join with The Articles of Freedom Liberty Coalition?

Volunteer to Preserve the American Dream?

Where there is no guidance the people fall, But in abundance of counselors there is victory.

ARTICLES OF FREEDOM

CONSTITUTIONALLY AUTHORIZED CENSUS TAKING

The SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; PONZI, TONTINE or LAWFUL INVESTMENT?

In 1932 school aged Americans learned about "The Magic Scrap of Paper" and their responsibilities as "stockholders" in what they perceived to be their lawful, constitutionally defined, Government. 

However, since 1932 much has changed.  "Lawful Money" is no longer lawful, and since 1994 the Social Security Administration has been operating as a wholly independent agency. 

So, what type of financial system had Democrat and Republican representatives during President Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration given the American people? 

A Ponzi system?

A Tontine system?

A system of lawful investments?

In the April 19, 1937 issue of The Scranton Times (archives, page 16) was the following article that explains the issuance of "bonds":

FEDERAL RESERVE HIT IN TALK BY LAMNECK

Washington, April 19 - Representative Lamneck (D Ohio) told the house today the federal reserve system is committing legally "the greatest burglary in history."

Critizing the system in the midst of a plea that the budget be balanced to avert "calamity," the Ohioan said that for a $300 investment a bank could get a $30,000 return."

If a burglar had a license to steal, he said, "he would at least have to carry away his loot. The federal reserve system has its loot brought to it."Lamneck said this was a procedure for a "steal" authorized by congress.

The treasury asks bids for several million dollars worth of bonds. A banker says he will take a million dollars worth and credits the treasury on his books with a million dollars.

Then he deposits the bonds with a federal reserve agent as collateral security for a million dollars in federal reserve notes and agrees to pay the cost of printing the currency - about $300.

He now has a million dollars in currency to balance the million dollar deposit he credited to the treasury.

He still owns the bonds and can collect the interest, about $20,000 a year on an investment of $300.

Further, in April 2009, speaking before the National Press Club in Washington D.C., here's what Dominique Strauss-Kahn said as he spoke on behalf of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).  In his talk, Mr. Strauss-Kahn responded to questions from the audience.  Of particular interest to all Americans (in my opinion) is his offer, just past the 33 minute point of his talk, " . . . OF BONDS WHICH WILL BE BONDS IN THE IMF CURRENCY . . . .

If you take the time to watch Dominique Strauss-Kahn's entire 'question and answer' session (from about the 30 minute point on) you may begin to understand why, in 1782, under the Articles of Confederation, Pennsylvania legislators promulgated "an ACT to prevent the erecting any new and independent state within the limits of this commonwealth".

What do you think?

Has the United States been re-venued into 'the crown's' feudalistic system of governance by an oligarchy of plutocrats using Ponzi and Tontine investment schemes?

If it has, is this "Ok" with you?  Is this what you want for your descendents?

It's up to every American to decide on an honorable method of investing in the future of our nation and to make the necessary changes as they are willing and able.

On Haiti

For food, clothing and shelter, will Haitians contract themselves; their lives, property and happiness into an unescapable condition of debt servitude to the men and women who comprise the oligarchy that sets in motion the policies for the World Bank and the IMF (International Monetary Fund)?

Wouldn't the best way to help Haiti be to simply assist Hatians in rebuilding their physical infrastructure - then leave them alone to develop their own economy? Yet, ex-presidents Clinton and Bush are, on behalf of the United Nations, requesting U.S. aid in "cash"; i.e., 'money'; a unit of currency that cost the Federal Reserve pennies, on any denomination of dollar ($1, $5, $10, $20, $50 or $100), to produce.

It appears (to me) that this catastrophic earthquake may be the catalyst the global 'money changers' have been waiting for. With this event Dominique Strauss-Kahn and his cronies, with the help of Bill Clinton and the George Bushes, can advance their global dominion through a one world currency.

Dominique Strauss-Kahn seems to have positioned the IMF to occupy Haiti and enslave the Hatians to a developing debt based monetary system under China's dominion.  In fact China may have already 'staked their claim' on Haiti under the "Law of the Flag" by immediately positioning their flag in a conspicuous manner that seemed to have gone un-noticed to most of the world except for Associated Press researcher Henry Hou in Beijing and CBSNEWS.

Flag incidents were cause for concern between Iraq and Iran on (or about) December 19, 2009; and, in March 2003, in a post to Independent Online; "UK 'concerned' about American flag-raising", a British Lieutenant Colonel was quoted as saying, "We go to liberate, not to conquer", presumably implying that American soldiers had been sent to conquer Iraq under the American flag.

So who will profit from this Haitian disaster?

Consider this April 19, 1936 article about how bonds are monetized.

Then watch Dominique Strauss-Kahn as he describes IMF plans to attendees at the National Press Club on April 16, 2009.  You can click the box for the transcript and either scroll to 00:33:21 or search for the word "BONDS" to begin reading.

To know how IMF plans are currently being implemented in Haiti see IMF to increase Haiti loan by $100 million; "The emergency financing would be provided as an augmentation to the existing IMF-supported arrangement with Haiti," IMF Managing Director Dominique ... , Material about Haiti and its activities with the IMF, and IMF Survey: Haiti Gets $36 Million in New IMF Financing The IMF's Executive Board has approved a $36.6 million ..., and Haiti Begins Participation in the IMF's General Data Dissemination System.

And, finally, consider that there are 'inner circle' people like Chelsea Clinton, who in 2008 worked for a New York-based hedge fund.

Has the United States been re-venued into 'the crown's' feudalistic system of governance?

Lack of meaningful work and loss of property causes stress. And, long term stress can lead to serious health problems.

So; What form of government has the United States?

And, what is "the crown"?

(For a prophetic perspective on this subject, see also Isaiah 28 and, consider from Strong's Hebrew Dictionary, the double meaning of "crown".)

Pleze Br'er Fox don't throw me in the Briar Patch

This is what investors told members of Congress they wanted to do:


This is what members of Congress did for investors:


Said Br'er Rabbit (the Investors) to Br'er Fox (the Senate) as Br'er Bear (the House) stood by;

"Pleze Br'er Fox, don't throw me in the briar patch."

Then Br'er Fox (the Senators) and Br'er Bear (the Representatives), in their perfunctory dysfunctional manner, resolve their differences by negotiation.

Government "Plan" or Banker's "Scam"? You decide.

Below is a message about the government’s “cash for clunkers” scam. I received this message from a friend of an anonymous friend. As you follow the math, keep in mind the following facts:

It cost the owners of the Federal Reserve approximately $.07 to print a "bill" of any denomination.

When a worker receives $10.00 for his/her labor the owners of the Federal Reserve profit approximately $9.93!

Another +/- $2.00 (20%) Federal Tax is demanded by agents of the IRS on behalf of the owners of the Federal Reserve.

Therefore, with the present use of "bills", for each $10.00 of a working man's labor his debt to the owners of the Federal Reserve is approximately $11.93.

Should laborers acquiesce by chip or plastic card to a totally cashless economy, profits for the owners of the Federal Reserve will increase exponentially - approximately $12.00 for every $10.00 of a man's labor!

Today we are at the threshold of an optimal form of indebted servitude, reminiscent of the feudal system from whence we came wherein none who opposes it will be able to buy or sell.

The message:

Surely this could not be true?

"You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time." . . . Abraham Lincoln

Good Morning all Tax Payers:

The Plan, The Scam, The Man, Don't ya just love it when a plan comes together?

The Scam

Here is what a learned friend had to say about my Democratic Math e-mail. It's even worse apparently than I first thought:

It's way worse than that. Ignore all the gas crap and just look at how the stupid car buyer got taken to the cleaners:

If you traded in a clunker worth $3500, you get $4500 off for an apparent "savings" of $1000.

However, you have to pay taxes on the $4500 come April 15th (something that no auto dealer will tell you). If you are in the 30% tax bracket, you will pay $1350 on that $4500.

So, rather than save $1000, you actually pay an extra $350 to the feds. In addition, you traded in a car that was most likely paid for. Now you have 4 or 5 years of payments on a car that you did not need, that was costing you less to run than the payments that you will now be making.

But wait; it gets even better: you also got ripped off by the dealer. For example, every dealer here in LA was selling the Ford Focus with all the goodies, including A/C, auto transmission, power windows, etc for $12,500 the month before the "cash for clunkers" program started.

When "cash for clunkers" came along, they stopped discounting them and instead sold them at the list price of $15,500. So, you paid $3000 more than you would have the month before... (Honda, Toyota , and Kia played the same list price game that Ford and Chevy did).

So let's do the final tally here:

You traded in a car worth: . . . $3500
You got a discount of: . . . . . . . $4500
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . --------
so far . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +$1000
But you have to pay: $1350 in taxes on the $4500
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . --------
Net so far: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -$350
And you paid: $3000 more than the car was selling for the month before
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---------
Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -$3350

We could also add in the additional taxes (sales tax, state tax, etc.) on the extra $3000 that you paid for the car, along with the 5 years of interest on the car loan, but let's just stop here.

So who actually made out on the deal? The feds collected taxes on the car along with taxes on the $4500 they "gave" you. The car dealers made an extra $3000 or more on every car they sold along with the kickbacks from the manufacturers and the loan companies. The manufacturers got to dump lots of cars they could not give away the month before. And the poor, stupid consumer got saddled with even more debt that they cannot afford.

Obama and his band of merry men convinced Joe consumer that he was getting $4500 in "free" money from the "government" when in fact, Joe was giving away his $3500 car and paying an additional $3350 for the privilege.

Think this was stupid for those who were crazy enough to swallow this wonderful scheme?

Just wait until we get health care with no additional costs over what most of us now pay for health insurance and the best medical care in the world. Think that scheme might be designed by the same people who came up with Cash for Clunkers?

You decide.

DOES THE U.S. HAVE A SYSTEM OF FEUDAL COURTS?

You decide.

The following from Deconstructing America: The Movie exposes some of the systemic pathology within the American courts.

On "Immunity"

Bob Hurt's research on "Immunity" has been moved to http://heros-heroines.blogspot.com/2009/11/blog-post.html.

What happened with the "bailout" money?

University of Ottawa Professor, Michel Chossudovsky, explains what's happening with the "bailout" money.

William Shatner's video message includes lessons about Truth, Integrity and Control of Guns

More lessons are below.

MAKE MINE FREEDOM (1948)

LACKAWANNA BAR FOUNDATION

You know as well as I, that it is the members of the Bar who promulgate legislation on behalf of corporate entities; and, once passed by legislators, it is upon that legislation that the courts must act. So, now that the Lackawanna Bar Association has formed their 501(c)3 charitable Foundation (to promote youth justice education and ensure access to the law for Pennsylvania's most vulnerable), does it mean that individual Bar members will be legally able to conspire to retaliate against Notaries and Mediators who tap into their profits by resolving conflicts before they escalate unto litigation?

In compliance with Title 22 § 501, will pettifogging Lackawanna County Bar members now be able to appoint their own Detectives and Private Police to assure job security by harrassment and intimidation of Notaries and Mediators through a pseudo-beneficent NGO?

Title 22 § 501 reads (in part): Appointment by nonprofit corporations.

(a) Appointment authorized.--Any nonprofit corporation, as defined in 15 Pa.C.S. Pt. II Subpt. C (relating to nonprofit corporations) maintaining a cemetery or any buildings or grounds open to the public, or organized for the prevention of cruelty to children or aged persons, or one or more of such purposes, may apply to the court of common pleas of the county of the registered office of the corporation for the appointment of such persons as the corporation may designate to act as policemen for the corporation. The court, upon such application, may by order appoint such persons, or as many of them as it may deem proper and necessary, to be such policemen.

And, since it is "the court of common pleas of the county of the registered office of the corporation" that is applied to "for the appointment of such persons as the corporation may designate to act as policemen for the corporation" - and the "Clerk of the Courts" for Lackawanna County is reported to be in New York - in which jurisdiction will their appointments be filed? Pennsylvania or New York?

Has there been a legal coup of our lawful constitutional form of government by Title 53 and Title 64 NGO's? And;

If so, why are the men and women of our state and nation still being led to believe that they live in a "free country" where the "rule of LAW" reigns supreme? And;

Without a bona fide constitutional system of justice, how will these corporate entities be made to compensate the men and women who have been feloniously robbed of their property and wealth, detained without warrant, and imprisoned under the "color of law" of their Bar members' seditious (criminal) enterprise?

Perhaps we need to review history. Perhaps we can begin with lessons from the "Reign of Terror" while we contemplate what it means to have a 501c.3 PENNSYLVANIA STATE TROOPERS ASSOCIATION, a nonprofit "Foundation to Support the men and women of the Law Enforcement Community", that can legally appoint their own private police force.

Is there no judge in Pennsylvania who has character and presence of mind equal in caliber to that of Ashtabula County Common Pleas Court Judge, Alfred Mackey? 

CONTINENTAL CONGRESS ELECTIONS WERE OCTOBER 10th 2009

The Continental Congress will convene on November 8, 2009.

MAYORS AGAINST ILLEGAL GUNS (MAIG)

The following is a Letter to the Editor in response to a 'Guest Commentary' - "Mayors Against (Illegal) Guns" by Carbondale Mayor Justin Taylor. Here's how that commentary appeared in the Opinion section of the Carbondale News on 9-23-2009.

To the Editor;

Who gave Mayor Taylor the jurisdictional authority to "assume" that "(A)nyone who continues to oppose" his "membership in the "Mayors Against Illegal Guns" . . . is in favor of illegal guns"?

If Mayor Taylor supports "all Second Amendment rights provided to law-abiding citizens," what has persuaded him to deny First Amendment Rights (inclusive of "redress") to those same "law-abiding citizens"? Did not Mayor Taylor take the correct oath of office? The one provided in the Constitution of Pennsylvania; Article VI, Section 3?

And, if he did take the correct oath, why (by his own words) does he appear to be seditiously colluding with other mayors to overthrow the underpinnings of our "guaranteed" constitutional (U.S. Constitution Article 4, Section 4) "republic"?

In the CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA, under Article I, DECLARATION OF RIGHTS it states;

"That the general, great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and unalterably established, WE DECLARE THAT - . . . The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned." (Article I, Section 21.)

So why is Mayor Taylor telling the people that he opposes "federal legislation that would override existing state laws . . . ", yet be in favor illegal gun laws; the illegality of which is determined by questions on a federal form that were promulgated by federal mandates and NOT supporting the full intent of the law as "unalterably established" in Article 1, Section 21 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania; the Constitution for which he is ASSUMED to have pledged his oath of office?

* * * * * * * * * * * *

See also WHERE HAS THE CORPORATE UNITED STATES HIDDEN ITS STATE'S SECRET?

The people of Carbondale, and those who are in positions of authority in all municipal and quasi-municipal jurisdictions in Lackawanna County, have a "Right to Know" that the "Clerk of the Courts" for Lackawanna County is in New York.

If the people who litigate, adjudicate and govern in Lackawanna County know that they are willfully participating in seditious, or criminal activities, why haven't they been investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and prosecuted by the Department of Justice (DOJ)?

What is prohibiting full disclosure of the adhesive and unconscionable nature of the the "tax" contracts by which people have had their "corporeal" and "incorporeal" property seized for noncompliance and benign "redress"?

How is it that men like Carbondale Mayor Justin Taylor will choose to serve a system of governance that appears to be based on fraud?

Is it the fictional NGO "ACORN" or is it prominent legislative and judicial family members who influence a matrix of corruption in Pa government?

Here's another way of looking at Senator Casey's support of ACORN and his influence in the matrix of judicial corruption in Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania. (Updated 10/19/2009)

Click on http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202423950217 to link to the August 21, 2008 Pa. Courts Pursuing Conciliation for Foreclosures post by Amaris Elliott-Engel at Pennsylvania Law Weekly to see how the legislative Casey and judicial Munley families continue to promulgate influence and legislation in order to adjudicate protections and defenses for owners of global banks and the controversial Non-Governmental Organization, ACORN.

In Lackawanna County, since - at least - the time Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “New Deal”, it seems to have been a common practice for these prominent families (i.e., the legislative Casey and the judicial Munley) to collude in seditious activities that broker the men and women of our nation into Thirteenth Amendment 're-constructed' statutory “servitude” to a corporate jurisdiction. Their backroom dealings have been without “full disclosure” of the adhesive and unconscionable natures of what I consider to be treasonous contracts that have allowed a statutory governance to be erected within the parameters of our intended form of government.

One example of how this contractual 'revenuing' (no pun intended) into a foreign corporate jurisdiction is being done, had been previously posted. In that example I ask: "BONDS": Are they UNCONSCIONABLE, IN VIOLATION of RICO STATUTES, or TREASON? and give an example of how we, American men and women who believe our selves to be free, have been "ceded" by legislative brokers into a type of corporate feudalism under what appears to be the same "Crown" business-as-usual enterprise system of governance that colonized the "new world" in the 17th Century on behalf of its investors.

So, again I bring your attention to Harrisburg Bureau Chief, Robert Swift’s December 3, 2008 article wherein he quotes Pennsylvania Majority Leader Todd Eachus, D-116 as saying; “Integrity is built in the DNA of the Casey family” and ask you, the reader to look past the wordsmiths’ rhetoric and decide for your self whether “integrity” can be for good or for evil.

Check out the facts and become an informed electorate.

AGENDA 21, ECOSYSTEMS, HEALTH-CARE and the INSURANCE INDUSTRY

Is there a connection between the U.N.'s AGENDA 21 programmes and projects for ECOSYSTEMS, "PUBLIC OPTION" HEALTH-CARE, and INSURANCE INDUSTRY "stakeholders"?

In this age of "corporate governance" where ALL law is contingent on what we, the people, allow via our contract with our representatives to this government I present to you the information we're being given to understand the connections between the United Nation's AGENDA 21 'programmes and projects' for ECOSYSTEMS, "PUBLIC OPTION" HEALTH-CARE and INSURANCE INDUSTRY "stakeholders".

"FULL disclosure" MUST be demanded of our legislators! Help them to perform their tasks and duties with the integrity you expect from them.

Consider the following and share your thoughts with your legislators. Help them to frame their questions to lobbyists who are pushing a global agenda for an oligarchy of plutocrats.

"Stakeholder" "Ownership and sustainability" is being encouraged by the World Health Organization through:

Strategic Planning and Innovation - " . . . SPI aims to increase combined coverage of services for TB, HIV/AIDS and malaria. It encourages ownership and sustainability of these services, and strives to help countries produce practical methods to deliver prevention and care for the three diseases."


And,

Ecosystems and health - There is growing concern amongst many natural scientists that human interventions are altering the capacity of ecosystems to provide their goods (e.g. freshwater, food, pharmaceutical products, etc) and services (e.g. purification of air, water, soil, sequestration of pollutants, etc).And, "special interest" lobbyist's for Wall Street investors and bankers are now gearing up to "securitize" "life settlement" policies "by packaging hundreds or thousands together into bonds. They will then resell those bonds to investors, like big pension funds, who will receive the payouts when people with the insurance die. The earlier the policyholder dies, the bigger the return . . . " (The rest of the article is below: Wall St. now investing in death.)

Consider how the bankers "plan to buy "life settlements," . . . "securitize" these policies, . . . (and) by packaging hundreds or thousands together into bonds . . . (t)hey will then resell those bonds to investors, . . . who will receive the payouts when people with the insurance die. . . . The earlier the policyholder dies, the bigger the return . . . " as you watch IMF Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn speak on new flexible lending programs - and other efforts - the International Monetary Fund (IMF) will use to help countries through the recession. Hear Mr. Strauss-Kahn for your self as he responded to questions from the audience. Pay particular attention to Strauss-Kahn's offer ". . . OF BONDS WHICH WILL BE BONDS IN THE IMF CURRENCY . . ." Strauss-Kahn's statements are just past the 33 minute point of his April 2009 talk before the National Press Club in Washington, DC.

If we, the people, believe what we are told - that We, the people, are the government - and understand how these seditious activities are usurping our authority to govern our selves, then all members of Congress and our state legislators require our oversight.

Let your representative know what you know so that he (also she) will know that you know that he knows!

Quit giving your 'law-makers' "wiggle-room" to pass treasonous "bills of attainder" for a foreign oligarchy that mandates you either willingly participate in their constructive fraud or be duly convicted of their statutory crime(s) and be jailed!

In the article (below) "Health care top issue as Congress returns" are some of the issues before Congress as they craft a comprehensive health care plan. Included in that article are some concerns that have been voiced by Catholic bishops.

And, because ALL LAW IS CONTRACTUAL under the 13th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, if you - a "U.S. citizen" - choose not to 'voluntarily' comply with federally legislated mandates for your health care (unless you speak-up NOW) you may be 'duly convicted of a crime'.

So, here's one more message on healthcare.