For a historical background as to
how this is relevant to the many docketed cases in counties nationwide I begin
with the following excerpt from Carr’s book, followed by a concisely penned
potential problem, and its solution, as that problem was foreseen by those who
penned one of the founding documents for an intended form of
government.
“In 1773, when Mayer Rothschild was
only thirty years of age, he invited twelve other wealthy and influential men
to meet him in Frankfort. His purpose was to convince them that if they agreed
to pool their resources they could then finance and control the World
Revolutionary Movement and use it as their Manual of Action to win ultimate
control of the wealth, natural resources, and man-power of the entire world.”
In 1776, a mere 3 years later, those
who assembled in Philadelphia penned the following “unanimous declaration” to,
in chess jargon, “checkmate” the outcome.
When in the Course of human events,
it becomes necessary for one people to (1) dissolve the political bands which
have connected them with another, and (2) to assume among the powers of the
earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of
Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires
that they should (3) declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
Excerpts of the 25 strategies
implied by Carr to be used as a “Manual of Action to win ultimate control of
the wealth, natural resources, and man-power of the entire world” begin below.
Some of the excerpts are followed with italicized comments.
1 - The speaker started to unfold
the plot by saying that because the majority of men were inclined to evil
rather than to good the best results in governing them could be obtained by
using violence and terrorism and not by academic discussions. The speaker
reasoned that in the beginning human society had been subject to brutal and
blind force which was afterwards changed to LAW. He argued that LAW was FORCE
only in disguise. He reasoned it was logical to conclude that “By the laws of
nature right lies in force”.
LAWS, RULES, EDICTS, ACTS,
REGULATIONS, DECREES, etc., are composed of words. Words have meanings. In
1785 the word “States” was defined as “Nobility”.
In Webster's Dictionary 1828 - Online Edition
the stated word, "States", again, is clearly defined as
"Nobility".
The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution, therefore, by
definition, reads as follows:
“We the people of the United States
Nobility, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure
domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general
welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do
ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States Nobility of
America.
2 - He next asserted that political
freedom is an idea and not a fact. He stated that in order to usurp political
power all that was necessary was to preach ‘Liberalism’ so that the electorate,
for the sake of an idea, would yield some of their power and prerogatives which
the plotters could then gather together into their own hands.
During “reconstruction” the 13th
Amendment to the United Nobility’s Constitution allowed for the exertion of a means
by which voluntary “servitude” would be FORCED by LAWS with which, if one chose
not to comply, one may be duly convicted of a crime.
Amendment XIII
Section 1.
Neither slavery nor involuntary
servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been
duly convicted, shall exist within the United States Nobility, or any
place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2.
Congress (“political bands”) shall
have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
3 - The speaker asserted that the
Power of Gold had usurped the power of liberal rulers even then, i.e. 1773. He
reminded his audience that there had been a time when FAITH had ruled but
stated that once FREEDOM had been substituted for FAITH the people did not know
how to use it in moderation. He argued that because of this fact it was logical
to assume that they could use the idea of FREEDOM to bring about “CLASS WARS”.
He pointed out that it was immaterial to the success of HIS plan whether the
established governments were destroyed by internal or external foes because the
victor had of necessity to seek the aid of ‘Capital’ which “Is entirely in our
hands.”
4 - He argued that the use of any
and all means to reach their final goal was justified on the grounds that the
ruler who governed by the moral code was not a skilled politician because he
left himself vulnerable and in an unstable position on his throne. He said
“Those who wish to rule must have recourse to cunning and to make-believe
because great national qualities like frankness and honesty, are vices in
politics”
Self explanatory.
5 - He asserted “Our right lies in
force. The word RIGHT is an abstract thought and proves nothing. I find a new
RIGHT ... to attack by the RIGHT of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all
existing forces of order and regulation, to reconstruct all existing
institutions, and to become the sovereign Lord of all those who left to us the
RIGHTS to their powers by laying them down voluntarily in their ‘Liberalism’.”
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in
the United States' Nobility, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are
citizens of the United States' Nobility and of the state wherein they reside.
No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or
immunities of citizens of the United States' Nobility; nor shall any state
deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of (13th
Amendment) law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the (13th Amendment) laws.
. . .
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of
the United States' Nobility, authorized by law, including debts incurred for
payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or
rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state
shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or
rebellion against the United States' Nobility, or any claim for the loss or
emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be
held illegal and void.
Section 5.
The Congress (political bands) shall
have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this
article.
6 - He then admonished his listeners
with these words “The power of our resources must remain invisible until the
very moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning or force can
undermine it.” He warned them that any deviation from the Line of the
strategical plan he was making known to them would risk bringing to naught “THE
LABOURS OF CENTURIES”.
7 - He next advocated the use of
‘Mob Psychology’ to obtain control of the masses. He reasoned that the might of
the Mob is blind, senseless, and unreasoning and ever at the mercy of
suggestion from any side. He stated “Only a despotic ruler can rule the Mob
efficiently because without absolute despotism there can be no existence for
civilization which was carried out NOT by the masses, but by their guide,
whosoever that person might be.” He warned “The moment the Mob seizes FREEDOM
in its hands it quickly turns to anarchy.”
Slogans from “ancient times” include
and are not limited to translated penned and typeset scriptures. For
instance, consider what may be the Hebrew root word for the word “masses” as
implied to have been used by Rothschild.
Excerpted from
https://studybible.info/strongs/H4522
Strong's Hebrew Lexicon Number-
H4522 מס מס - מס מס - mas mis - mas, mees
From H4549; properly a burden (as
causing to faint), that is, a tax in the form of forced labor
KJV Usage: discomfited, levy, task
[-master], tribute (-tary).
Brown-Driver-Briggs' Hebrew
Definitions - מס מס
1. gang or body of forced labourers,
task-workers, labour band or gang, forced service, task-work, serfdom,
tributary, tribute, levy, taskmasters, discomfited
a. labour-band, labour-gang, slave
gang
b. gang-overseers
c. forced service, serfdom, tribute,
enforced payment
Origin: from H4549
8 - He next advocated that the use
of alcoholic liquors, drugs, moral corruption, and all forms of vice, be used
systematically by their “Agenturs” to corrupt the morals of the youth of the
nations. He recommended that the special ‘Agenturs’ should be trained as
tutors, lackeys, governesses, clerks and by our women in the places of
dissipation frequented by the Goyim. He added “In the number of these last I
count also the so-called society ladies who become voluntary followers of the
others in corruption and luxury. We must not stop at bribery, deceit, and
treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end.”
9 - Turning to politics he claimed
they had the RIGHT to seize property by any means, and without hesitation, if
by doing so they secured submission, and sovereignty. He pronounced “Our STATE
marching along the path of peaceful conquest has the RIGHT to replace the
horrors of wars by less noticeable and more satisfactory sentences of death
necessary to maintain the ‘terror’ which tends to produce blind submission.”
10 - Dealing with the use of slogans
he said “In ancient times we were the first to put the words ‘Liberty’,
‘Equality’ and ‘Fraternity’ into the mouths of the masses ... words repeated to
this day by stupid pollparrots; words which the would-be wise men of the Goyim
could make nothing of in their abstractness, and did not note the contradiction
of their meaning and interrelation.” He claimed the words brought under their
directions and control ‘legions’ “Who bore our banners with enthusiasm.” He
reasoned that there is no place in nature for ‘Equality’, ‘Liberty’ or
‘Fraternity’. He said “On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy
of the Goyim we have set up the aristocracy of MONEY. The qualification for
this aristocracy is WEALTH which is dependent upon us.”
(*// This would suppose that the
speaker felt that hereditary aristocracy is a natural development (societal
evolution) and is a blessing; and that the gift of statecraft is perpetually
passed on from father to son. Was it really his opinion, or was it just visited
upon him (after the fact) by the writer of these ‘original documents’ who seems
to be in favour of feudalism?)
From
https://studybible.info/strongs/H1471 - Brown-Driver-Briggs' Hebrew Definitions
– Goyim - גּי גּוי - n m
1. nation, people
a. nation, people
1. usually of non-Hebrew people
2. of descendants of Abraham
3. of Israel
b. of swarm of locusts, other
animals (fig.) n pr m
c. Goyim? = "nations"
Origin: apparently from the same
root as H1465
11 - He next expounded his theories
regarding war. In 1773 he set down a principle which the governments of Britain
and the United States publicly announced as their joint policy in 1939. He said
it should be the policy of those present to foment wars but to direct the peace
conferences so that neither of the combatants obtained territorial gains. He
said the wars should be directed so that the nations engaged on both sides
would be placed further in their debt, and in the power of ‘Our’ Agenturs.
12 - He next dealt with
administration. He told those present that they must use their wealth to have
candidates chosen for public office who would be “servile and obedient to our
commands, so they may readily be used as Pawns in our game by the learned and
genious men we will appoint to operate behind the scenes of government as
official advisers.” He added “The men we appoint as ‘Advisers’ will have been
bred, reared, and trained from childhood in accordance with our ideas to rule
the affairs of the whole world.”
13 - He dealt with propaganda, and
explained how their combined wealth could control all outlets of public
information while they remained in the shade and clear of blame regardless of
what the repercussions might be due to the publication of libels, slanders, or
untruths. The speaker said “Thanks to the Press we have got gold in our hands
notwithstanding the fact that we had to gather it out of the oceans of blood
and tears... But it has paid us even though we have sacrificed many of our own
people. Each victim on our side is worth a thousand Goyim.”
Twenty Years of Media Consolidation
Has Not Been Good For Our Democracy - The media has become controlled by a
handful of corporations thanks to the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Excerpt from https://billmoyers.com/author/michaelcorcoran/
By Michael Corcoran | March 30, 2016 -
Excerpt: “ . . . President
Bill Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The act, signed into
law on February 8, 1996, was “essentially bought and paid for by corporate
media lobbies,” as Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) described it, and
radically “opened the floodgates on mergers.”
“The negative impact of the law
cannot be overstated. The law, which was the first major reform of
telecommunications policy since 1934, according to media scholar Robert
McChesney, “is widely considered to be one of the three or four most important
federal laws of this generation.” The act dramatically reduced important Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) regulations on cross ownership, and allowed
giant corporations to buy up thousands of media outlets across the country,
increasing their monopoly on the flow of information in the United States and
around the world.”
14 - He next explained the necessity
of having their ‘Agentur’ always come out into the open, and appear on the
scene, when conditions had reached their lowest ebb, and the masses had been
subjugated by means of want and terror. He pointed out that when it was time to
restore order they should do it in such a way that the victims would believe
they had been the prey of criminals and irresponsibles. He said “By executing
the criminals and lunatics after they have carried out our preconceived ‘reign
of terror’, we can make ourselves appear as the saviours of the oppressed, and
the champions of the workers.” The speaker then added “We are interested in
just the opposite ... in the diminution, the killing out of the Goyim.”
Definitions of Agentur (with inserted
questions) – n; an administrative unit of government (MUNICIPALITY
AUTHORITIES?), a unit with administrative responsibilities (BOARDS?), a
business that serves other businesses (a MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY?), a
commercial or industrial enterprise and the people who constitute it (28 USC
3002(15) LEGISLATORS?).
From
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department,
commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United
States.
For an example of how “Agenturs”
operate, see Psychological Aspects of Undue Influence by Ira Daniel Turkat+ -
JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2003; PROBATE & PROPERTY
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/real_property_trust_estate/publications/probate-property-magazine/rppt_publications_magazine_2003_jf_turkat/
Excerpt: “Although many
pathways lead to undue influence, a simple model can be constructed to
understand its genesis by considering three classes of variables. These are
1. predisposing factors,
2. vulnerability enhancers, and
3. execution variables.
Simply put, certain characteristics
make an individual susceptible to being manipulated (predisposing factors),
that if nurtured “properly” (vulnerability enhancers) are likely to produce the
desired outcome (execution variables). To understand the development of undue
influence, how these factors operate, interact, and overlap must be
considered.”
15 - He next explained how
industrial depressions and financial panics could be brought about and used to
serve their purpose saying “En forced unemployment and hunger, imposed on the
masses because of the power we have to create shortages of food, will create
the right of Capital to rule more surely than it was given to the real
aristocracy, and by the legal authority of Kings.” He claimed that by having
their Agentur control the ‘Mob’, the ‘Mob’ could then be used to wipe out all
who dared to stand in their way.
The United Nobility removed silver
from their Article 1 § 10 constitutional coin circa 1965 and, shortly
thereafter, enlisted their own, by definition, Mercenary Force, the employees
of which are tendered with currency backed by foreign coin, and obligated to
take on the activities of a ‘Mob’ that could “be used to wipe out all who dared
to stand in their way”.
The following is excerpted from the
RAND CORPORATION article; The Evolution of the All-Volunteer Force by Bernard
Rostker - https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9195.html
Why Did the United States Move to an
All-Volunteer Force (AVF)?
Although the country had conscripted
its armed forces for only 35 of its 228 years — nearly all in the 20th century
— the American people were generally willing to accept this practice when
service was perceived as universal. However, in the 1960s, that acceptance
began to erode. There were five major reasons:
• Demographics. The size of the
eligible population of young men reaching draft age each year was so large and
the needs of the military so small in comparison that, in practice, the draft
was no longer universal.
• Cost. Obtaining enough volunteers
was possible at acceptable budget levels.
• Moral and economic rationale.
Conservatives and libertarians argued that the state had no right to impose
military service on young men without their consent. Liberals asserted that the
draft placed unfair burdens on the underprivileged members of society, who were
less likely to get deferments.
• Opposition to the war in Vietnam.
The growing unpopularity of the Vietnam war meant the country was ripe for a
change to a volunteer force.
• The U.S. Army’s desire for change.
The Army had lost confidence in the draft as discipline problems among draftees
mounted in Vietnam.
These views were reinforced by the
findings of the Gates Commission, set up in 1969 by President Richard Nixon to
advise him on establishing an all-volunteer force. The commission addressed key
military-manpower issues, including supply and demand, attrition and retention,
and the mix of career and noncareer members in the context of management
efficiency and personal equity. It concluded that the nation’s interests would
be better served by an all-volunteer force than by a combination of volunteers
and conscripts. In 1971, President Nixon signed a new law to end the draft and
put the selective service structure on standby. After a two-year extension of
induction authority, the end of the draft was formally announced in January
1973.
16 - The infiltration into
continental Freemasonry was next discussed extensively. The speaker stated that
their purpose would be to take advantage of the facilities and secrecy
Freemasonry had to offer. He pointed out that they could organize their own
Grand Orient Lodges within Blue Freemasonry in order to carry on their
subversive activities and hide the true nature of their work under the cloak of
philanthropy. He stated that all members initiated into their Grand Orient
Lodges should be used for proselytizing purposes and for spreading their
atheistic materialistic ideology amongst the Goyim. He ended this phase of the
discussion with the words. “When the hour strikes for our sovereign Lord of all
the World to be crowned these same hands will sweep away everything that might
stand in his way.” . . .
Consider how Agenturs for the United
Nobility’s “posterity” may have set up a plan to profit from the mandated
insurance and “Affordable Health Care” of DNA specific “Goyim”. Will,
“When the hour strikes for our sovereign Lord of all the World to be crowned
these same hands will sweep away everything that might stand in his way”
include the extermination of all “the seed of Abraham”?
Galatians 3 (ISR) (15)
Brothers, as a man I say it: a covenant, even though it is man’s, yet if
it is confirmed, no one sets it aside, or adds to it. (16) But the
promises were spoken to Aḇraham, and to his Seed. He does not say, “And to
seeds,” as of many, but as of one, “And to your Seed,” who is Messiah.
17 - He next expounded the value of
systematic deceptions, pointing out that their Agentur should be trained in the
use of high sounding phrases, and the use of popular slogans. They should make
the masses the most lavish of promises. He observed “The opposite of what has
been promised can always be done afterwards ... that is of no consequence.” He
reasoned that by using such words as Freedom and Liberty, the Goyim could be
stirred up to such a pitch of patriotic fervour that they could be made to
fight even against the laws of God, and Nature. He added “And for this reason
after we obtain control the very NAME OF GOD will be erased from the ‘Lexicon
of life’.”
18 - He then detailed the plans for
revolutionary war; the art of street fighting; and outlined the pattern for the
‘Reign of Terror’ which he insisted must accompany every revolutionary effort
“Because it is the most economical way to bring the population to speedy
subjection.”
19 - Diplomacy was next discussed.
After all wars secret diplomacy must be insisted upon “in order that our
Agentur, masquerading as ‘poltitical’, ‘Financial’, and ‘Economic’ advisers,
can carry out our mandates without fear of exposing who are ‘The Secret Power’ behind
national and international affairs.” The speaker then told those present that
by secret diplomacy they must obtain such control “that the nations cannot come
to even an inconsiderable private agreement without our secret agents having a
hand in it.”
20 - Ultimate world government the
goal. To reach this goal the speaker told them “It will be necessary to
establish huge monopolies, reservoirs of such colossal riches, that even the
largest fortunes of the Goyim will depend on us to such an extent that they
will go to the bottom together with the credit of their governments ON THE DAY
AFTER THE GREAT POLITICAL SMASH.” The speaker then added “You gentlemen here
present who are economists just strike an estimate of the significance of this
combination.”
21 - Economic war. Plans to rob the
Goyim of their landed properties and industries were then discussed. A
combination of high taxes, and unfair competition was advocated to bring about
the economic ruin of the Goyim as far as their national financial interests and
investments were concerned. In the international field he felt they could be
encouraged to price themselves out of the markets. This could be achieved by
the careful control of raw materials, organized agitation amongst the workers
for shorter hours and higher pay, and by subsidizing competitors. The speaker
warned his co-conspirators that they must arrange matters, and control
conditions, so that “the increased wages obtained by the workers will not
benefit them in any way.”
Who profits when wages are
increased? Is it the worker or, is it the person(s) who print the notes
by which the worker is tendered and required to pay taxes on the note’s face
value? See Cost of Printing - https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/currency_12771.htm
22 - Armaments. It was suggested
that the building up of armaments for the purpose of making the Goyim destroy
each other should be launched on such a colossal scale that in the final
analysis “there will only be the masses of the proletariat left in the world,
with a few millionaires devoted to our cause ... and police, and soldiers
sufficient to protect our interests.”
23 - The New Order. The members of
the One World Government would be appointed by the Dictator. He would pick men
from amongst the scientists, the economists, the financiers, the
industrialists, and from the millionaires because “in substance everything will
be settled by the question of figures.”
24 - Importance of youth. The
importance of capturing the interest of youth was emphasized with the
admonition that “Our Agenturs should infiltrate into all classes, and levels of
society and government, for the purpose of fooling, bemusing, and corrupting
the younger members of society by teaching them theories and principles we know
to be false.”
Proverbs 30:14 There is a
generation whose teeth are swords, And whose jaw-teeth are knives, To devour
the poor from off the earth, And the needy from among men.
25 - National and International Laws
should not be changed but should be used as they are, to destroy the
civilization of the Goyim “merely by twisting them into a contradiction of the
interpretation which first masks the law and afterwards hides it altogether. Our
ultimate aim is to substitute ARBITRATION for LAW.”
From
https://www.pacode.com/secure/data/231/chapter1300/chap1300toc.html
CHAPTER 1300. ARBITRATION
Subchap Rule
A. COMPULSORY ARBITRATION … 1301
B. PROCEEDING TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
AND CONFIRM AN ARBITRATION AWARD IN A CONSUMER CREDIT TRANSACTION … 1326
Source
The provisions of this Chapter 1300 adopted March 16, 1981,
effective May 15, 1981, 11 Pa.B. 1078, unless otherwise noted.
(Editor’s Note: Chapter 1300 reorganized at 36 Pa.B. 693
(February 11, 2006).)
As a juror presented with this evidence, what is your decision for
your self, your loved ones, your neighbors, your friends and your community?
<< Home