RACKETEERING OF DEBENTURE AND OTHER SECURITIES

To - Fax: LACKAWANNA COUNTY COURT
Judge, Michael J. Barrasse – 570-963-xxxx
Judge, Vito P. Geroulo - 570-496-xxxx
CC: District Attorney Andrew Jarbola, III - 570-963-xxxx
Representative James Wansacz – 717-772-2284/705-7018
Sen. Robert Mellow - 570-839-4816
Rep. Chris Carney - 570-585-9977, 202-225-9594
Governor’s Northeast Regional Office - 570-614-2094
Media - Bloggers and other concerned people: http://www.thetruthstore.blogspot.com
From: Veronica A. HANNEVIG
Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Subject: Click on RACKETEERING OF DEBENTURE AND OTHER SECURITIES for more information about this fax.

Docket Nos: CP-35-SA-0000065-2006, CP-35-SA-0000067-2006, CP-35-SA-0000066-2006, CP-35-SA-0000070-2006, CP-35-SA-0000072-2006, CP-35-SA-0000075-2006 AND TR-0000860-06 AND 1684 MDA 2006

Pages: 3

This is to acknowledge my receipt of the intimidating attached unsigned demand for $120.00 from “debt collector” CHARLENE SARVER at NATIONAL RECOVERY AGENCY, PO BOX 67015, HARRISBURG, PA 17106-7015; “A PROFESSIONAL COLLECTION AGENCY” (presumably) on behalf of TRI COUNTY HUMAN SVC CT (3168952) for the services your court requested of them on 06/13/07.

With this fax I remind the court that on Friday, January 18, 2008 (see fax below this fax) I returned to TRI COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES their unsigned 12/31/07 extortionary demand for “120.00”. Also, via that same fax a copy was forwarded to Judge Vito P. Geroulo for presentment to his ‘bonded surety’, Michael Barrasse, for his payment to TRI COUNTY for the evaluative services he ordered; evaluative services that were not relevant to the Petition For Review of Constitutional questions regarding jurisdiction (or, agency), title (or, identity) and ownership (whether ownership of a bona fide American flag and 1987 Toyota Camry is “absolute” or “conditional”). Judge Barrasse’s “order” was designed to force me to either voluntarily comply with servitude to the Lackawanna County Commissioners’ prison industry for 18 to 36 months, or agree to assassinate my self’s reputation and character by voluntary submitting to an unconscionable and usurious payment with debt based money for a mental evaluation that would imply that I was somehow mentally unstable or deficient for petitioning his court with a Constitutionally permissible redress of a grievance. Such blatant disregard by officers of the court for the ‘rule of law’ makes me shudder with FEAR; fear for my self, my descendents and my nation!

Were the objective deliberations of officers in this Lackawanna County Court truly determined to adjudicate the above captioned dockets in the honorable manner anticipated, both Judge Geroulo and Judge Barrasse would simply offset any outstanding charges. (See the following FAX to the LACKAWANNA COUNTY OFFICE OF COURT COLLECTIONS dated Tuesday, March 11, 2008.) So, what else is going on?

Since the aforementioned fax was sent to TRI COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES, et al, on Friday, January 18, 2008; and while Judge Geroulo either failed to take action, or deliberately withheld his response to my petition, I have learned that ownership of the controverted 1987 Toyota Camry sedan VIN JT2SV21E6H3142887 had been conveyed without my knowledge to G&G Towing, Carbondale, Pennsylvania even while it remains insured by me through Allstate Insurance until July 3, 2008!

It has become apparent that a “pattern of racketeering activity” and “organized crime” has emerged in which “at least two incidents of racketeering” have been conducted by persons in the Commonwealth’s unified court system since February, 2005. The pattern includes, “extortion” of what I believe (absent any adjudication to the contrary) to be my property by Judges McGraw, Geroulo and Barrasse, the withholding of action with respect to my legal claims and defenses which include and is not limited to “kidnapping”; i.e., being held in a condition of involuntary servitude, and Judge Barrasse’s threatened force and fear to keep me therein under color of official right.

* * * * * * * * * * * * January 18, 2008 Fax * * * * * * * * * * * *

To-Fax (Email): TRI COUNTY HUMAN SERVICE - 570-282-xxxx
Judge, Vito P. Geroulo - 570-496-xxxx
Rep. Jim Wansacz - 570-254-7063, 451-3306
Sen. Robert Mellow - 570-839-4816
Rep. Chris Carney - 570-585-9977, 202-225-9594
Governor’s Northeast Regional Office - 570-614-2094
Media - Bloggers, and Other concerned people go to: http://www.thetruthstore.blogspot.com
From: VERONICA A HANNEVIG
Date: Friday, January 18, 2008

Subject: Update - FRAUDULENT MISUSE OF MOTOR VEHICLE, ID/DRIVER LICENSE CREDENTIALS by government officials and agents - Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. VERONICA A HANNEVIG

Pages: 2

The attached TRI COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES unsigned 12/31/07 demand for "120.00" is hereby (via fax) being returned to TRI COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES and forwarded to Judge Vito P. Geroulo for presentment to his surety*, Michael Barrasse, for the payment requested for the services he ordered.

In the future, please submit any further billing to he who had bonded himself in suretyship with Judge Vito P. Geroulo and Magistrate Sean P. McGraw. Billing advice is as follows:

Judge, Michael Barrasse
200 North Washington Avenue
Scranton, Pennsylvania 18503

*Surety - Security against loss; a person bound for the faithful performance of a contract by another.

* * * * * * * Synopsis of the Controversy * * * * * * *

1. On February 1, 2006, without evidence of a bona fide warrant, City of Carbondale Police Officers James Reed, Badge #126 and Dave Fofi, Badge #110, seized from me a white 1987 Toyota Camry sedan VIN JT2SV21E6H3142887 and a metal, un-obscured Title 4 U.S.C. §1, and

2 American Flag with the printing "Sovereign, Private Property, Non-Commercial American" that identified both my jurisdiction and a recorded unrebutted Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) lien conspicuously displayed on the metal by an affixed sticker; 99-cv-2497.

3. At the time of the aforementioned seizure on February 1, 2006, no citations were issued.

4. On February 3, 2006, via Certified Mail (70050390000226773478 and 70050390000226773485) I afforded Officers Reed and Fofi an opportunity to privately resolve this matter in accordance with law consistent with my non-commercial jurisdiction and their Oaths of Office, specifically Article 1 of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the U.S. Constitution with the first ten (10) Amendments as ratified in 1791.

5. On February 9, 2006 I received thirteen (13) SUMMONS with attached CITATION/SUMMONS wherein each the “Defendant’s signature” acknowledging receipt of the Citation was indicated by Officer James Reed as “FILED”.

6. I have no knowledge of my “signature” being “FILED” to be used as a witness against my self or in acknowledgment of any Citation with the City of Carbondale Police Department.

7. On February 13, 2006 Magistrate Sean McGraw, Esquire, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Magisterial District Court No: 45-3-03 was offered an opportunity to resolve what appeared to be a justiciable claim by providing statutory proof that would substantiate the thirteen (13) claims cited by Officer James Reed. Attached to this offer was an Affidavit of Publication of the Legal Notices that were run for four (4) consecutive weeks beginning 5/27/1999 to 6/16/1999 that advised the reader that the aforementioned Toyota would be identified by a private Flag showing "Sovereign, Private Property, Non-Commercial American" and copies of Certified Mail receipts showing the delivery of this ‘affidavit of publication’ to the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, PA State Police, Lackawanna County Sheriff’s Department, the Department of Revenue, and the Attorney General’s office.

8. On March 17, 2006 a neutral forum for mediation (Alternative Dispute Resolution, ADR) between me and Magistrate Sean McGraw, Esquire was requested to resolve the underlying principles involved with diverse jurisdictions and the return of the property described in paragraph one (1) as a Toyota and a flag.

9. On March 17, 2006 I received from Magistrate Sean McGraw, Esquire, thirteen “NOTICE OF TRIAL SUMMARY CASE”, Docket Nos.: TR-0000155-06, TR-0000158-06, TR-0000162-06, TR-0000160-06, TR-0000157-06, TR-0000164-06, TR-0000165-06, TR-0000166-06, TR-0000159-06, TR-0000161-06, TR-0000163-06, TR-0000153-06, AND TR-0000154-06 wherein Magistrate McGraw stated, “This court has received your plea of NOT GUILTY to the above summary violation(s). The sum of $.00 has been accepted as collateral for your appearance at trial.”

10. Seeing that I had not entered a plea of “NOT GUILTY” to Magistrate McGraw or District Court No: 45-3-03, such unauthorized action by Magistrate McGraw might be reasonably questioned in that it would be deemed as practicing law from the bench, and/or acting under an alleged power of attorney that I had not granted to him.

11. Consistent with “the law of the Flag” and my non-commercial jurisdiction wherein I am obligated to ‘agree with my adversary quickly, while I am with him in the way’, on April 17, 2006 each of the thirteen (13) “NOT GUILTY” pleas were “FULLY ACCEPTED AND RETURNED FOR VALUE.” I further requested that the “TITLE BE RELEASED AND THE ACCOUNT CLOSED”.

12. Magistrate McGraw asserted his option to remain silent; 1. to my offer to him to resolve a justiciable claim by providing to me the statutory proof(s) that would substantiate the thirteen (13) claims cited by Officer James Reed, 2. to my offer to resolve the underlying principles and interests involved with an adjudication of title as it applied to my claim to diverse jurisdictions by ADR (see paragraph 7), 3. with regard to the return of what I believed to be my property (see paragraphs 1 and 11) and for which I continued to maintain insurance in good faith, and, 3. his prejudicial action as referenced in paragraph 10 herein.

13. By their prejudicial actions Magistrate McGraw and Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas Judge, Vito P. Geroulo have shown a personal interest in the above captioned dockets and appeared to have deliberately instigated and maintained a pattern of events consistent with “larceny by fraud” whereby D.O.T. records now show G & G Towing as the “owner” of the controverted 1987 Toyota (see the attached DOT abstract and my proof of Allstate Insurance which is valid until July 3, 2008).

I do not take 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904 lightly. Neither do I take lightly Title 1 Pa.C.S. § 1503(c)(4) and the “inherent and indefeasible rights” secured within Article 1 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania - most specifically the control or interference “with the rights of conscience” - as provided in Section 3, and “any law impairing the obligation of contracts, or making irrevocable any grant of special privileges or immunities” as provided in Section 17!

* * * March 11, 2008 Fax for "Win - Win" Remedial Action * * *

To - Fax: LACKAWANNA COUNTY OFFICE OF COURT COLLECTIONS
Catherine Kacer - 570-496-xxxx
CC: Representative James Wansacz – 717-772-2284/705-7018
District Attorney Andrew Jarbola, III - 570-963-xxxx
Sen. Robert Mellow - 570-839-4816
Rep. Chris Carney - 570-585-9977
Governor’s Northeast Regional Office - 570-614-2094
Media - Bloggers and other concerned people: http://www.thetruthstore.blogspot.com
From: Veronica A. HANNEVIG
Date: Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Subject: Docket Nos: CP-35-SA-0000065-2006, CP-35-SA-0000067-2006, CP-35-SA-0000066-2006, CP-35-SA-0000070-2006, CP-35-SA-0000072-2006, CP-35-SA-0000075-2006 AND TR-0000860-06

Pages: 6

This is to acknowledge my receipt of Catherine Kacer’s invitation to me to “appear for a court hearing scheduled for 05/16/2008, 12:30 PM in court collections”. (See attached 2 pages.)

In lieu of an appearance ‘in the flesh’ I am including with this fax the three page “CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE” that was previously provided to the court on June 4, 2007 between 2:25 and 3:02 PM. The “CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE” preceded my prior 06/08/2007 appearance ‘in the flesh’ before Judge Michael Barrasse. As the court will recall, when I arrived ‘in the flesh’ for the previous “hearing” on 06/08/2007 I was subsequently incarcerated. It was evident that the “hearing” was not scheduled for me to be “heard” on the substantive matters originally brought before Judge Vito P. Geroulo as a benign “petition for review”, but for me to “hear” an irrelevant pre-textual conviction by Judge Michael Barrasse that was based on the false presentation of an unidentified “public defender”. I, therefore, responsibly choose to defend and protect my self from any further injury and abuse ‘in the flesh’ by your court and respectfully decline your offer to participate in a court hearing on May 16, 2008 at 12:30 PM in court collections; nevertheless I offer this court three ‘win-win’ options:

1. If you believe the purpose of your court is to show a profit for the Lackawanna County Commissioners as they “trade” the securities of the County through their listing in Dun & Bradstreet, then I respectfully remind you that I entered the Court of Common Pleas ‘in forma pauperis’ in May, 2006. As such, I presume the court to have the same authority to use the signature that Officer James Reed alleged to be mine to offset my Treasury Department “credits” for the alleged “debt” of $550.00.

2. If you believe that what I believed to be my property was indeed my property and I am due “just compensation” for it being taken without due process, then you can use the same signature that was used by Officer James Reed and offset my Treasury Department account “credits” and pay me the incurred “debt” that now amounts to approximately $xxx,xxx,xxx.00.

3. If the property I believed to be mine had always been the property of the State or Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and never mine, then I am due “just compensation” for the cost of that property and the (now) 18 ½ years that I had maintained it in good faith on behalf of the State/Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Again, the solution is the same. You can use the same signature that was used by Officer James Reed to convict me and simply offset my Treasury Department account “credits” by “debiting” my account the approximate $xxx,xxx,xxx.00 that is owed to me.

If you choose to offset my Treasury Department “credits” for the alleged “debt” of $550.00, please provide to me a receipt that it has been “paid”. Otherwise, a cashier check can be made payable to VERONICA A HANNEVIG and sent via certified mail to XXX MAIN STREET, SIMPSON, PENNSYLVANIA XXXXX.

WHAT DOES PAYING TAXES HAVE TO DO WITH INTEGRITY?

A County "ORDINANCE" to which I was in opposition, passed on May 28, 2008.

On Monday, June 2, 2008 I visited the offices of the County Commissioners to view the signature pages to find out to whom the sinking fund interest would be assigned.

What I found was that the Lackawanna County Commissioners had signed an incomplete agreement whereby they had authorized their 'wet ink' signature to be used electronically.

For (at least) 71 years politicans have known, or had reason to know, how "bonds" are monetized. In knowing how bonds are monetized, there is NO excuse for them to allow anyone, or any entity, other than the CREDITORS, i.e., We, The People who have paid into these funds with our labor, to have the monetary advantages that these County Commissioners are "Assigning" to Banks and other private entities!

Were the Democrats and Republicans looking out after the best interest of we, the People, we should have MAYBE been required to pay a 'one time' property tax.

The one time tax would have allow our municipalities to bundle their assets and periodically re-invest the interest for the sole benefit of the people and their municipal infrastructure.

The signature pages of this ordinance, an ordinance that (when read in its entirity) claims that the Commissioners cannot be held liable for their decisions, shows a pattern of organized activity that includes local tax collectors up to, and including, judges who sit as treasonous pundits pompusoly rendering decisions that exclude the fact that this blatant fraud exist.

Bottom line: We are at a juncture in our history. We either continue to keep up the pace of making (analogous) bricks without straw for our feudalistic masters; or, we turn it about. We keep the monetary system the way it is and demand that we be paid what we are owed in repariations for the past 75 years that we and our ancestors have been enduring government extortion for FEAR of the 'pains and penalties' to do otherwise.

In The Scranton Times archives for April 19, 1937, page 16 I found the following article:

FEDERAL RESERVE HIT IN TALK BY LAMNECK

Washington, April 19 - Representative Lamneck (D Ohio) told the house today the federal reserve system is committing legally "the greatest burglary in history."

Critizing the system in the midst of a plea that the budget be balanced to avert "calamity," the Ohioan said that for a $300 investment a bank could get a $30,000 return."

If a burglar had a license to steal, he said, "he would at least have to carry away his loot. The federal reserve system has its loot brought to it."Lamneck said this was a procedure for a "steal" authorized by congress.

The treasury asks bids for several million dollars worth of bonds. A banker says he will take a million dollars worth and credits the treasury on his books with a million dollars.

Then he deposits the bonds with a federal reserve agent as collateral security for a million dollars in federal reserve notes and agrees to pay the cost of printing the currency - about $300.

He now has a million dollars in currency to balance the million dollar deposit he credited to the treasury.

He still owns the bonds and can collect the interest, about $20,000 a year on an investment of $300.
http://www.thetruthstore.blogspot.com/

"Iron sharpens iron". Here is the letter I FAXED in opposition to the "ORDINANCE". Probably less than "perfect", but may be usable for others in their local dealings.

May 28, 2008

County of Lackawanna Pennsylvania
Office of the Commissioners
Michael J. Washo
Corey D. O’BrienA.J. Munchak
Courthouse Administration Building
200 Adams Avenue
Scranton, Pennsylvania 18503
570-963-6812 (fax)

RE: OPPOSITION TO “AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOAR4D OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF LACKAWANNA, PENNSYLVANIA AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY OF LACKAWANNA, PENNSYLVANIA TO ISSUE GENERAL OBLIGATION NOTES, SERIES A OF 2008 AND FEDERALLY TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION NOTES, SERIES B OF 2008, IN ORDER TO REFUND CERTAIN OUTSTANDING DEBT AND TO FUND CERTAIN CAPITAL PROJECTS”

In accordance with the “severability clause” of 53 Pa.C.S. with this fax I am ‘voicing’ my opposition to the above captioned “ORDINANCE”. Attached you will find documents to support my Constitutional opposition which is also in accordance with Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, The Federalist Papers #48 and the concerns of the General Assembly of Pennsylvania under the Articles of Confederation in 1782.

I will attempt to make known my concerns from three perspectives; the lawful, the legal and the prophetic, within the parameters of your fiduciary duties as representatives to the people of the county and the essential characteristics of indenture contracts; those which are “adhesion” and “unconscionable”. But, first, I preface what I am about to say with the well known, yet to be rebutted, fundamental point of reference upon which I present lawful, legal and prophetic opposition to this, or any other such ORDINANCE that may be promulgated.

PREFACE
Recent documentaries have revealed that the cost to the owners of the Federal Reserve (those who print the American people’s ‘units of exchange’, i.e., “dollars” or “money”) is approximately $.042 to print a "bill" of any denomination, therefore, when a worker receives $10.00 for his/her labor the owners of the Federal Reserve profit approximately $9.958 just for printing that “bill”. Another +/- $2.00 (20%) Federal Tax is then demanded by agents of the IRS on behalf of those who print the money. As I calculate it, with the present use of these "bills", for each $10.00 of a working man's labor his DEBT to the owners of the Federal Reserve (those who print the money) is approximately $11.96. Should a laborer acquiesce by chip or plastic card (i.e., a likely future use of any “Real [government issued] ID”) to a totally cashless economy, the profits to the owners of the Federal Reserve will increase exponentially! Without consideration for other forms of taxation and interest on loans and mortgages, American men and women will profit those who oversee the manufacturing of the card or chip they must use; approximately $12.00 for every $10.00 of a man's labor! In fact, when you take the time to do the math, you will see that Governor Rendell’s $2.00 per hour increase in the “minimum wage” of Pennsylvanians still kept the affected ‘wage earner’ at “minimum wage” and essentially increased the revenues of the owners of the Federal Reserve (at least) $1.92 per hour, per the tens of thousands of recipients!

Today the people of our nation and this county are at a threshold. Will you, our elected representatives who took an oath to support, obey and defend with fidelity the Pennsylvania and U.S. Constitutions of a “republic” with a democratic process, support, obey and defend with fidelity that Form of government to which you pledge your allegiance and swore your oath? Or, Will you, volunteer the people of this county further into a “feudal” form of governance with a communistic “party” process wherein the ‘American dream’ will be based on an optimal form of voluntary indebted servitude to a (relative) ‘handful of men’ who print the money and “register” themselves as the “absolute owner” of that money.

HISTORY
According to "http://findlaw.com/" - "All that is necessary for most contracts to be legally valid are the following two elements:

· All parties are in agreement (after an offer has been made by one party and accepted by the other).

· Something of value has been exchanged, such as cash, services, or goods (or a promise to exchange such an item) for something else of value. "

Therefore, given the binding nature of our freewill participation in contracts, it is disingenuous to believe that the "Charters" (i.e., the ‘corporate contracts’) that were granted to "new world" colonizers (including "William Penn, Esquire, and his heirs and assigns" in 1681 by Charles the Second, Chancellor Heneage, Lord Finch, and their heirs and successors) somehow (miraculously) disappeared in 1776 by a few (relatively speaking) signatures on a “Declaration of Independence”. Or, in 1791 with the ratification of the “Bill of Rights”, i.e., the first 10 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

Indeed, Esquire Penn's “tribute” obligations to his corporate feudal masters most likely remained in tact and it was simply a matter of business-as-usual for European investors to commission their 'privy councilors' to promulgate the contract law(s) that would continue to govern their global commerce to this day. No doubt that this was, and continues to be, easily done with the blessings of the people who have not yet recognized that their venerated Constitution was written in 'doublespeak'! Since the birth of our nation platitudes like "emancipation", "reconstruction", "reorganization", “war on terror”, etc. have toyed with our emotions and left us vulnerable to proverbial “ravaging wolves in sheep’s clothing”. Have we forgotten that "councilors" still promulgate the laws upon which the courts must act? And that the “privy councilors” became the “Board of Trade and Plantations”? What (now) are they called in the global marketplace? Are they now members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) who are using members of the United States Congress, State Legislators and Commissioners in “Quasi-Municipal Corporations” as their “Suppliers” of debt under the Uniform Commercial Code? Have you considered that you may have been “commissioned” to broker to corporate “masters” absolute ownership of other people’s labors and physical and intellectual properties?

THE LAWFULAccording to http://www.findlaw.com/ 'the freedom of contract' is "a power or right to contract and freely determine the provisions of contracts without arbitrary or unreasonable legal restrictions esp. as guaranteed under the contract clause of Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution". The Congress of these united States, however, had the power to Amend this Constitution: And they did!

THE LEGALWith the 13th and 14th Amendments to the original, duly ratified U.S. Constitution of 1791, preparatory steps were taken by Congress to, in a business-as-usual manner, re-venue into the system of government with which they were most comfortable ALL Americans who were willing to alienate (or lien) themselves from their "unalienable Rights" into a statutory form of feudalism. In 1865 the 13th Amendment was crafted with words that allow for 'voluntary servitude' and "punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted".

Furthermore, Congress gave themselves the "power to enforce this article (the 13th Amendment; i.e., voluntary servitude) by appropriate legislation". The next step in this re-venuing scheme came in 1868. Complimentary with feudalistic governance and an (oligarchic) party process, Democrat and Republican members of Congress gave to themselves jurisdiction over the descendants of those Americans who voluntarily "ceded" themselves into statutory servitude in a manner consistent with the laws enacted to facilitate an economy based on the principles of “debenture”. With the assistance of the Democrat and Republican members of Congress, a silent (plutocratic) coup incrementally continued in 1913 with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act and the 16th and 17th Amendments, in 1933 with Roosevelt's monetary 'reorganization' (a “New Deal” for his plutocratic cronies), in 1964 with the Civil Rights Act, then with the Coinage Act of 1965 whereby, (according to wikipedia) constitutionally mandated silver was eliminated from the circulating dimes and quarter dollars, and diminished in the half dollar. In addition to the above provisions, for which it is best known, the act:

* Made all coins and currency of the United States (including certain bank issues) a legal tender. This has been taken to reverse the demonetisation of the Trade Dollar, and

* Gave the Secretary (of the Treasury) broad discretion to enter into contracts to assure an adequate supply of clad coins, without regard to public procurement laws.

Fortunately, in Pennsylvania, the crafters of the Pennsylvania Constitution had the foresight to provide remedy to those men and women who would become cognizant of this blatant “bait and switch” fraud and in Article 1, Section 17 provided that; "No ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, or making irrevocable any grant of special privileges or immunities, shall be passed." What safeguards are you putting into the above captioned “ORDINANCE” that will protect and defend the inhabitants within the County who choose not to have debt based “liens” placed on their “unalienable”/”inalienable” Rights?

THE PROPHETIC
Prophecy, when it comes to pass, is nothing more than the consequences of predictable societal behaviors.

The prophecy found in Rev. 13:16-17 seems consistent with the mandated Real ID AND with the anticipated consequences of the normal behaviors of a statutorily oppressed people who may be “fearful, and unbelieving” (Rev. 21:8).

"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads (i.e., perhaps a ‘mind set’ in the ‘executive functioning’ area of one’s brain?): And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name"

BUT, (if I’m correct in my assessment) there’s another side of this prophecy. It’s found in Rev. 18:11–13:

“And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more: The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, . . . and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.”

Who knows! It may be that all that is needed is a leader with access that encourages and sustains the “courage” of others to come out of an economic bondage of their own making. After all, one would think that a people who have been praying “Thy kingdom come” for 2000 years and have the ability to “bind” and “loose” at will would be more than willing to follow such a leader and collectively shake off their oppressors.

In my opinion, the promulgation of this “ORDINANCE” is a mere formality to give credible authority to a parallel system of feudal governance that IF ALLOWED will authorize the final death blow to our (previously guaranteed) constitutional republic, and usher in that which “Christians” have feared for two millennia.

I can only quote scripture, speak from the objective lessons of History. The destiny of our nation begins at the local levels of government; i.e., with you.

Therefore, it is my desire that whatever you, in the office of “County Commissioner” decide to do that you include provisions that will “support, obey and defend” the Constitutional protections provided for men and women, like my self, who choose NOT to apply for commercial benefits and privileges that must be paid for with a debt-based currency, a “legal” fiat “tender” that alienates us from our “unalienable Rights” and causes many to suffer undue ‘pains and penalties’ from court officers who choose to gain political favor by sustaining, what amounts to, treasonous Bills of Attainder.

My personal evaluation of the lawful, legal and prophetic characteristics of the proposed mandated legislation has been from the vantage of a 1960’s era (pre Treasury Department “mercenary”) Navy veteran who took an oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution. I am a woman who believes the "self evident truth" that she "resides" in her "freehold" (i.e., her "self"/”body” whose name is the “title” that “identifies” her) until she returns (at death) to her "domicile" wherein she must give an account to her “Creator”. With that said, ANY “AGREEMENT”; i.e., “CONTRACT” that you would make for debt based money, that essentially enslaves the labors of my future generations to the future generations of the mere men who print that money, would violate my Sovereign's Law against "coveting" that “benefit” or “privilege”, and "stealing" to get it! Such are the characteristics and subsequent consequences of the indenture contracts that have been legislated by Democrat and Republican Congressional and State legislators since the Civil War. Clearly, we, the inhabitants of our nation, and Lackawanna County, have been legislated into a form of mandated statutory feudalism by systemic adhesion and unconscionable contracts with those who print the U.S. currency, our mandated unit of exchange. Our ‘legal tender’ has been monopolized by a global oligarchy of plutocrats whose ultimate goal appears to be the megalomaniacal occupation and distribution of the labors and produce of our global resources; human and otherwise. The councilors who craft and mandate ORDINANCES such as this would, at the founding of our republic, have been “guilty of high treason”! I ask that you reject this proposed “ORDINANCE”, which appears to be based on FRAUD, and negotiate that reparations be demanded that would return to the inhabitants, i.e., the true “creditors” in this current economy, that which they had paid in “taxes” to Lackawanna County since 1965. Once the constitutionally proper relationship is re-established, I anticipate that successful economic conditions will prevail, not only for the county, but all who dwell therein.
Respectfully yours,



Veronica A. HANNEVIG
xxxx Main Street
xxxxxxxxx, Pennsylvania xxxxx

Attached: 4 pages (8 total)
cc: Other people who are interested in this matter