General Motors Has Become China Motors?

Is GM now under "private" ownership in China?  Slide over to the 7 minute spot.

 

The pitfall of "Privatization" in Pennsylvania and elsewhere

On March 25, 2013 Raphael Satter of the Associated Press posted an article about the death of Boris Berezovsky.  Whether intended or not, Satter's article, Berezovsky's billions: How the tycoon lost so much, seems to imply that Berezovsky, who capitalized on capitalistic "privatization", became a victim of his own greed.

Under the heading "FOUNDATIONS OF A FORTUNE", Satter writes:

Berezovsky, a mathematician, made his fortune in the 1990s during the catastrophic privatization of the Soviet Union's state-run economy. That era was marked by hyperinflation, contract killings and rampant corruption. As Russia's GDP crumbled, oligarchs leveraged their ties to ruthless criminals and crooked officials to tear off huge chunks of the country's assets for themselves, draining resources and stripping factories to build fabulous fortunes.

Why is this a "big deal"?

Below are two pages from two different Encyclopedias.  FUNK & WAGNELL defines "Communism"; WINSTON'S CUMULATIVE ENCYCLOPEDIA defines "Feudalism".  

 

After you read these Encyclopedia entries, answer the question: 

What form of government has the United States?

"Communism", "Feudalism" or a "Constitutional republic"?

Is what happened in Russia in the 1990's happening here under the guise of "privatization"?

Have you checked to see if your "incorporated" municipality is already a "private company"?

You decide.

The Story of Your Enslavement

If you, the potential viewer, don't have the 14 minutes to spare, slide to the 10:58 mark and watch to the end.

Pettifoggery

From Webster's 1828 Dictionary "Pettifoggery" is defined as,

"The practice of a pettifogger; tricks; quibbles."

     The following is an example of how a "pettifogger" earns his reputation and why s/he is such a valuable commodity to the purveyors of a well organized criminal enterprise.

 

From Section 26  (page 348) of the .pdf, The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

UNLAWFUL REPRESENTATIONS

SEC. 26. No action or failure to act by the Commission or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in the administration of this title shall be construed to mean that the particular authority has in any way passed upon the merits of, or given approval to, any security or any transaction or transactions therein, nor shall such action or failure to act with regard to any statement or report filed with or examined by such authority pursuant to this title or rules and regulations thereunder, be deemed a finding by such authority that such statement or report is true and accurate on its face or that it is not false or misleading. It shall be unlawful to make, or cause to be made, to any prospective purchaser or seller of a security any representation that any such action or failure to act by any such authority is to be so construed or has such effect.

(June 6, 1934, ch. 404, title I, Sec. 26, 48 Stat. 902; Pub. L. 105-353, title III, Sec. 301(b)(5), Nov. 3, 1998, 112 Stat. 3236.)

     Seeing that we (and our ancestors) had entrusted our "Rights" to our public servants in return for "Honest Service"; shouldn't we have expected those servants to have had a basic understanding of the theory and practice of banking and a willingness to expose, and prosecute, members of Commissions and Boards who were not protecting and defending those "Rights"?   

     Who, among us, has given our authority to allow our servants' actions, and failure to act with regard to agents, commissioners, governors, legislators, bankers, lawyers, judges, and others whom we've employed, to be inconsequential?  

Educate your self. 

      Search Henry Dunning Macleod's The theory and practice of banking, Volume 1 (1892) for the word "Rights" and read the passages pertaining to them.

Smackdown!

The 13th Amendment reads:

1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.  

2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

This 2011 "Smackdown" video is an excellent example of how Congress legislates the "involuntary servitude" of those men and women who choose not to voluntarily comply with 28 USC 3002(15) servitude to a corporate "United States".

 

Sequester vs The Real Economic Collapse