Is "Reconciliation" the Solution to the Debt Crisis?

The first part of this post is from the "Ask Marilyn" syndicated column.

Ask Marilyn: Is This the Solution to the Debt Crisis? | Parade.com Gary Dalessandro of Sharpsville, Pa., writes: What's the solution to this problem?

A tourist stops at a small hotel, puts a $100 bill on the counter, and goes to inspect a room. The owner takes the bill and rushes off to pay the butcher, to whom he owes $100. The butcher races to his wholesaler and pays off his own $100 debt. The wholesaler hurries to the farmer and gives him $100 for the pigs he bought. The farmer hands over $100 to the party planner who set up his bachelor bash. The party planner heads to the hotel to pay the $100 she owes for the party room and lays the bill on the counter. At that point, the tourist returns to the front desk, says that the room is unsatisfactory, picks up the $100, and departs. The tourist has his money back, and everyone else is $100 ahead by reducing his or her debt by that amount. Could this be the answer to the debt crisis?

Marilyn responds: Can you determine what happened, readers? The answer follows:

Actually, everyone stayed exactly the same. For example, the farmer was owed $100 by someone, but he also owed $100 to someone else. The payments canceled one another out.

 * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Notwithstanding the writer's use of the word "bill" for "dollars"; is Marilyn correct?

What if the "Taxpayers" were the "tourist" (in the above scenario) and the "owner" was the 'Federal Reserve - Banking cartel'?

What would happen if every "Taxpayer" inspected the cartel's business and came to understand that it is they who are the "holder in due course" of the funds that are used by this cartel?

To whom would the cartel be liable if "Taxpayers" simply picked up their 'good faith' money and departed this system?

How would this cartel's creditors satisfy payment?

And; Will there be unintended consequences to the "austerity" programs being pushed by this cartel?

For a smooth transition; check out the facts and become an informed activist.

Cyber classes are available at Sherman Institute.

The Industrial Revolution?

Perhaps it's time for Historians to revisit the "Industrial Revolution".

Who profited?

Consider this graphic "Anthracite Combination" and the relationship Banks had with Railroads through their Directorships.

For more information about the railroads and banks visit:

The Dictionary of American History; Railroads, The ERI (Executive Intelligence Review), and scan for "Director" in The History of The First National Bank of Scranton.

If this is a topic that interests you, search www.archive.org.

Self Evaluative Vocational Exercise

In times past, men and women arrived at their "vocations" through their "occupations". Today, men and women get their "careers" through their choice of "jobs". A job and an occupation are not the same. The former (a job) is typically done out of need; the latter (an occupation), because of desire.

A career is generally planned and pursued, not always out of desire but, because of circumstances outside one's control. A vocation, however, is (according to its 15th Century Latin definition) one's "call", or "name". To find out if you're on a career path that is consistent with your vocation, give honest, self-reflective responses to the following self evaluative Vocational Exercise.

Consider the following information about the work you've done.  Consider all your work; paid and volunteer, household chores, hobbies, etc.:

The title of the job I did was:	My tasks and duties were:	I liked:	I disliked	I learned the about my “self”:	following about others:
Last job:
Next job:
Next job:
Etc., etc.:
First job:

What did you learn about your “self”?  Fill in blanks 1 through 5; then insert the words corresponding to the numbers in the “objective” sentence at the bottom of the page.

1. I enjoy working with (people, concepts, data, things, etc.) ____________.

2. My interests are (realistic, investigative, artistic, social enterprising, conventional) ____________.

3. I want to be regarded by my employer as a (planner, influencer, coordinator, etc.) ____________.

4. I work best when I am (problem solving, structured, unstructured, behind the scenes, etc.) ____________.

5. My abilities are (list as many as apply; cognitive, physical, psychomotor, sensory) ____________, ____________, ____________, ____________, ____________.

6. My motivational payoff is (money, power, respect, prestige, impact, etc.) ____________.

My objective is to work with ______1 ______ where I am free to pursue my _____2_______  interests and operate as a _____3_______ in a _____4_______ capacity using my _____5_______, ______5______, and ______5______ abilities which leads to _____6_______.


How do I reach my goal now that I have an objective?

The Roger Sherman Institute is planning now for the courses it will be offering during the summer semester (starting June 2012).  The Institute can just as easily teach those courses that are “in demand” as those that are part of its assorted programs.  Tell your likeminded friends and let your choices be known.  The Roger Sherman Institute has two sites: Sherman Institute.org and Sherman Institute.com.  Visit either and, if appropriate, follow enroll in classes and fulfill your calling.

"Group Think": A Historical Perspective from WWII

Secondløitnanten (1993) - IR 3 surrenders.

Susan Cain on The Power of Introverts

Political Activists vs. Nightline (Uncut)

NDAA Update

Father Nathan Monk at Pensacola City Council

The Roger Sherman Institute: Fundamentals of Economics

Check out the facts and become an informed activist.

Sign up for cyber classes at Sherman Institute.

Course #97 - Fundamentals of Economics from Aaron Bolinger on Vimeo.

Up close and personal with George Knapp

Who owns your home?

Thrive

About global domination . . . A movie . . .

Sodom and Gomorrah revisited

Why must the American people re-learn the lessons of history?

Here is an excerpt from Chapter 19 of the ancient Book of Jasher. In this account you will find that it was the decisions of "four judges" (not homosexuality) that gave a bad name to the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah.

31 And Paltith daughter of Lot went forth that day to fetch water, and she put bread into her pitcher of water, and she went to draw water by the poor man's place, and she took out the bread from the pitcher and gave it to the poor man and he ate it.

32 And the three men saw what Paltith did to the poor man, and they said to her, It is thou then who hast supported him, and therefore has he not starved, nor changed in appearance nor died like the rest.

33 And the three men went out of the place in which they were concealed, and they seized Paltith and the bread which was in the poor man's hand.

34 And they took Paltith and brought her before their judges, and they said to them, Thus did she do, and it is she who supplied the poor man with bread, therefore did he not die all this time; now therefore declare to us the punishment due to this woman for having transgressed our law.

35 And the people of Sodom and Gomorrah assembled and kindled a fire in the street of the city, and they took the woman and cast her into the fire and she was burned to ashes.

The Toronto 9/11 Hearings - 9/11/11

Era of Love & Peace (man known as Vic Beck)

More at:  FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES and THE LETTER OF THE LAW.

How To Take Our Country Back (full video)

Jury Power

Total Proof of the New World Order

YADA . . . Yada . . . yada . . .

What was the "Original Sin"?

We seem to have forgotten that ALL law is contractual.

Even at the beginning, Yahweh Elohim gave contractual stipulations to the man, Adam, and the woman, Eve, in the care of their freehold.

Yahweh told them they could eat of the fruit of the trees with the exclusion of one.

When the serpent came around (consider the serpent as a feudal master, mafia Don, or Corporation sole) the serpent made an "offer", the Eve and Adam "accepted" the offer, and the fruit of the excluded tree (which, incidentally, did not belong to the serpent) was the "consideration" that sealed their contract.

In their "acceptance" of the serpent's contract our ancestors literally "sold the farm"!

HOWEVER; Since there is no longer "lawful" money - it's been debt-based since the mid to late 60s - and our "unalienable" economic and property Rights have been brokered into bond contracts ALL contracts, real and implied, have become "adhesive".  Furthermore, ALL these contracts are "unconscionable" in that they require debt-based monetary consideration for which we are the surety. This is Peonage and peonage is illegal!  Such unconscionable contracts include and are not limited to; birth-certificates, marriage and driver's licenses, real-estate transactions, and tithes and offerings . . . .

David said in Psalm 110 that there WILL be a remnant who volunteer when the time is right.

Could "NOW" be the time?

Isn't it time we stop contracting with the devil, a "corporation sole", and dissolve the authorities, commissions, etc. that are wasting the assets of our freehold and presuming their rulership over us?

Is it enough to say "Yada . . . yada . . . yada . . ." when these questions are raised?

For your consideration: An alternative cure for "dis-ease".

"Sound Money" Economic Summit

On Feb 7th and 8th, 2011, the South Carolina Sound Money Committee conducted an “Economics Summit” in Columbia. Presenters at this summit included; Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Dr. Larry Parks, Aaron Bolinger, and Geoff Turk.

The National Veterans Committee on Constitutional Affairs (NVCCA) assembled a collection of educational videos for members of the general public and state legislators to help them understand both the scope of the problem, and what our states can do to effect positive change. Although some of this material is “South Carolina specific,” the principles and concepts can be applied to any of our nation's union of 50 states.

Have a note pad handy – the subject matter contained is DEEP, including constitutional legal research.

Aaron Biblical Presentation 2 (912) from ethan graham on Vimeo.

Do the men and women of our nation enjoy "Human Rights" protections and defenses? If so, from whom?

On  May 10, 2011 Flavia Krause-Jackson of Bloomberg News posted to Bloomberg.com a report:  U.S. Pushes China on Human Rights Record at the Risk of Upsetting ‘Friend’.

In the Bloomberg report Krause-Jackson quoted Vice President Joe Biden as saying:

" . . . the U.S. administration believes “strongly” that protecting human rights “is the best way to promote long-term stability and prosperity of any society.” "

So:

For what reason was "Disability Rights Protesters Arrested in DC" on May 2, 2011?

How is it that "the U.S. (28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)) administration" turns 'a blind eye' to the most blatant Human Rights abuse that is being perpetrated and perpetuated by the men and women within their own corporate jurisdiction?

Why was the following report not filed by an American reporter?

On Monday, May 9, 2011 Mike Kellerman, a Washington DC reporter with Iran's US edition of PressTV posted his video, Elder abuse, neglect rampant in US, and the following report titled:

They are a small but growing movement called the National Association to stop Guardian Abuse.

They say the disabled and elderly are Being prayed upon by the legal system, by crooked lawyers and courts Who they say scam millions of dollars by having older people declared Guardians of the courts depriving them and their families of their rights and taking their assets.

Protesting in front of the Justice Department, they met with a few members of Congress demanding something be done.

With millions Of baby boomers turning into senior citizens now, they're warning that Billions of dollars will be stolen from the elderly and their families By probate courts which they are claiming conspire with lawyers and state agencies like adult services to rob older people of their homes and Savings often declaring them without proper evidence, incompetent to handle their own financial affairs.

It's a big business they say, lawyers getting rich…

Its an assault on the elderly and their golden years says the group Citing case after case of the judicial system collaborating to put elderly Or disable people in a conservatorship status with the courts giving The lawyers and courts , without family having a say, complete control over an elderly person's life savings.

With the aging of the US population in record numbers over the next5 years, the baby boomers, they say that unless what they call a corrupt system is fixed, millions will be robbed of all they own by unscrupulous lawyers, social workers, corrupt probate courts, and the state agencies who are supposed to be protecting the elderly, not abusing them.

Are "Law Enforcers" and "Law makers" being manipulated by so called "investors" to statutiorly achieve their ultimate megalomaniacal authority over all peoples and nations?

Should the corporate United States and the State of Pennsylvania be dissolved?

UNITED STATES CODE provides the legal definition of "State" and "United States" in 28USC3002:

(14) ``State'' means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.

(15) ``United States'' means--

          (A) a Federal corporation;

          (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or

          (C) an instrumentality of the United States.

On page 31 of "CURRENT EVENTS", the "Condensed Weekly Newspapers that were used by Teachers in Public and Private Schools" during the 1932 - 1933 school term indoctrinated future generations of Americans to accept a corporate business model of governance.

Because anything other than full disclosure of the nature of a contract is illegal, fraudulent and unethical; and the etiology of a corporate structure of governance had not been fully disclosed (see BUSINESS-AS-USUAL STRATEGIES FOR PROTECTING "THE CROWN" INVESTORS and their GLOBAL ANONYMITY) to its share and stock holders; and the acts of its directors and those in control have become illegal, oppressive and fraudulent; and, its assets have been misapplied and wasted, should not the corporation’s unhappy stock/shareholders have recourse to dissolution?

From 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1981:

(a) General rule.--Upon application filed by a shareholder or director of a business corporation, the court may entertain proceedings for the involuntary winding up and dissolution of the corporation when any one of the following is made to appear:

(1) The acts of the directors, or those in control of the corporation, are illegal, oppressive or fraudulent and that it is beneficial to the interests of the shareholders that the corporation be wound up and dissolved.

(2) The corporate assets are being misapplied or wasted and that it is beneficial to the interests of the shareholders that the corporation be wound up and dissolved.

(3) The directors are deadlocked in the direction of the management of the business and affairs of the corporation and the shareholders are unable to break the deadlock and that irreparable injury to the corporation is being suffered or is threatened by reason thereof. The court shall not appoint a receiver or grant other similar relief under this paragraph if the shareholders by agreement or otherwise have provided for the appointment of a provisional director or other means for the resolution of a deadlock but the court shall enforce the remedy so provided if appropriate.

Should the corporate United States and the State of Pennsylvania be dissolved? Here are examples of how some shareholders view the management of the business affairs of these 28 USC 3002 corporations.

REPUBLICANS

DEMOCRATS

Dumbing Down the Nation Through Education

Jury found "kids for cash" judge Mark Ciavarella guilty of racketeering and conspiracy

The defense and prosecution both declared victory after Mark A. Ciavarella Jr. was found guilty on 12 counts and acquitted of 27 Friday, but the former Luzerne County Juvenile Court judge, who would have spent less than seven years in prison under a plea agreement that collapsed in 2009, now faces 13 to 15 years.

A jury in U.S. District Court found Mr. Ciavarella guilty of racketeering and conspiracy for accepting $997,600 from wealthy developer Robert K. Mericle. Mr. Mericle testified he won a contract to build a for-profit juvenile detention center after a referral from Mr. Ciavarella.  Read more:

"PERSON" POWER: WHO'S IN CONTROL?

Regarding Unz & Co.

Unz & Co. has been setting the standard for compliance products and services since 1879.   What is Unz & Company's relationship to the 28 USC 3002 (15) United States Corporation?  What is Unz & Company's relationship to the 28 USC 3002 (14) State?

Some key terms from the Unz & Co. glossary are:

Harmonized System - Schedule of tariff nomenclature arranged in 6 digit codes allowing all participating countries to classify traded goods on a common basis. Beyond the 6 digit level, countries are free to introduce national distinctions for tariff or statistical purposes. This system will replace the Tariff Schedule of the United States (TSUS). The Harmonized System was implemented by the United States and other major GATT countries after Jan, 1. 1988. Additional countries are expected to be implementing the system subsequent to that date.

HTSUSA - Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the U.S. Annotated. The U.S. application of the Harmonized System for the classification of imported merchandise. The U.S. adheres to the international classification system to the six digit level and then adds four addition digits for rate of duty assignment and statistical purposes.

Marking (or marks) - Letters, numbers, and other symbols placed on cargo packages to facilitate identification.

Schedule B - Refers to Schedule B, Statistical Classification of Domestic and Foreign Commodities Exported from the United States . All commodities exported from the United States must be assigned a ten-digit Schedule B number. Note: the first 6 digits of the Schedule B number are harmonized.

Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) - Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), Department of the Treasury, implements and enforces financial and trade sanctions. FAC has the authority to include within the definition of the sanctioned government those individuals and entities that FAC has determined are owned by, controlled by, or acting directly or indirectly on behalf of the target government. Parties so identified are known as Specially Designated Nationals or SDNs. In practice, an SDN is a target government body, representative, intermediary, or front (whether overt or covert) that usually is located in a third country and functions as an extension of the sanctioned government. An SDN may also be a third-party company that otherwise becomes owned or controlled by the target government or that operates on its behalf. No criminal linkage is necessary. Ownership by, control by, acting on behalf of, or profiting from trade with the target government or country would suffice to qualify a person for designation.

Unz & Company's Mission Statement advises:

Our mission is to provide fully compliant, timely products and services to U.S. companies that are involved in international trade or the transportation of dangerous goods. We will be the most informed and informative company in our field, and make full compliance available to every company regardless of size, through training, systems, or forms.

Our value will be found in the knowledge that Unz & Co. will serve as your source for compliance expertise, allowing you to maintain your focus on your core business.

Therefore, given the above information, I ask:

What Form of Government has the United States?  And,

Is there an undisclosed purpose for legislating government mandated identification? 

You decide.

Have the American people been the unknowing victims of TREASONOUS FRAUD?

How important is an Oath of Office?

Were you, or are you now, in the U.S. military?  Were you told that the U.S. or State you served was defined under Title 28 U.S.C. § 3002 (14)(15)?

(14) “State” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.

(15) “United States” means—

  (A) a Federal corporation;

  (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or

  (C) an instrumentality of the United States.

If you believe you've been a victim of a seditious or treasonous fraud your remedy may be found in the verbage of Title 8 U.S.C. § 1481(b):

(b) Whenever the loss of United States nationality is put in issue in any action or proceeding commenced on or after September 26, 1961 under, or by virtue of, the provisions of this chapter or any other Act, the burden shall be upon the person or party claiming that such loss occurred, to establish such claim by a preponderance of the evidence. Any person who commits or performs, or who has committed or performed, any act of expatriation under the provisions of this chapter or any other Act shall be presumed to have done so voluntarily, but such presumption may be rebutted upon a showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the act or acts committed or performed were not done voluntarily.

What is you plan?

William Pawelec Interview

About "False Flag" events.

Treason, sedition, and subversive activities

Are police officers of your local corporate municipality willing participants in a "seditious conspiracy" to overthrow our guaranteed "republican Form of government"?

The Bailout Money and Why You Dont have to Pay Your Mortgage 1/4

Why aren't the Governors' of the several states protecting us from lies and theft?

Perhaps a deliberated document in the nature of a 'Bill of Indictment' needs to be presented to the Governors of each of the several states. Then, maybe, the governors of the several states will do the right thing by and for the people and order their State's militia to execute justice on 'Wall Street fraudsters' who are operating in their State AND on treasonous judges who willingly protect the fraudsters and their own BAR associates' criminal enterprise.

BUSINESS-AS-USUAL STRATEGIES FOR PROTECTING "THE CROWN" INVESTORS and their GLOBAL ANONYMITY

In the beginning "The Crown", a "corporation sole" established investment interests in the American colonies.

Origins - The concept of the Crown took form under the feudal system, evolving from and synthesising oriental and barbarian concepts of kingship. Under the feudal system, in England and (separately) Scotland, all rights and privileges were ultimately granted by the ruler (though this was not the case in all countries that had this system). All land was granted by the Crown to lords, in exchange for feudal services, and they in turn granted the land to lesser lords. One exception to this was common socage—owners of land held as socage held it subject only to the Crown. The Crown as ultimate owner of all property also owns any property which has become bona vacantia.

When a relative few of the early colonist declared their independence, the investors didn't argue, the investors compromised. The investors put their hirelings in places whereby they could promulgate and enact the laws upon which their statutorily established courts would act (see History 1450-1789: Navigation Acts). The following is an example of how corporate governance would be "statutorily" erected as a "Crown Entity" within a commonwealth (or anyplace within these united states of America "by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress" - see Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution). The example that follows shows that corporate governance was erected in the capitol city of Kingston, Jamaica, in 1803.

The erection of a corporate UNITED STATES (see: U.S.C. Title 28 § 3002 (15) “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the United States) and all its appellations therefrom appears to have started with the incorporation of Philadelphia on March 11, 1789 (Recorded L. B. No. 3, p. 455 See the Acts of Assembly passed December 9, 1789, Chapter 1479; April 2, 1790, Chapter 1509; March 8, 1792, Chapter 1665;  April 19, 1794, Chapter 1754; April 4, 1796, Chapter 1905; April 11, 1799, Chapter 2091; March 3, 1800, Chapter 2117) and further confirmed by the "Gettysburg Address in 1864, and the Incorporation of District of Columbia by (Presidential) Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, under the Emergency War Powers Act and the Reconstruction Acts" (reorganized June 11, 1878 --16 Stat. 419 Chapter 62).  

"The Crown" has its Treasury", and "The Treasury" has its agenda for stakeholders in "Crown Entities".

What is a Crown Entity? - Crown entities are bodies established by law in which the Government has a controlling interest - for example, by owning a majority of the voting shares or through having the power to appoint and replace a majority of the governing members - but which are legally separate from the Crown.
Section 7 of the Crown Entities Act 2004 outlines the five categories of Crown entity:
Statutory entities - bodies corporate established through legislation;
Crown entity companies - often previously known as Crown-owned companies;
Crown entity subsidiaries - companies that are controlled by Crown entities;
School boards of trustees - as constituted under the Education Act 1989; and
Tertiary education institutes - polytechnics, universities and wananga.

Treasury hirelings develop rhetoric and protocol to assure the success of their global agenda.

Corporate Social Responsibility: Dealing With Political Exposure

View more presentations from Competitive enterprise Institute.

(Who is Competitive Enterprise?

Location: Washington, United States
Work: Policy Research Organization at Competitive Enterprise Institute
About: CEI is a non-profit public policy organization dedicated to advancing the principles of free enterprise and limited government. )

So, if the agenda of "The Crown" and its "Treasury" is to protect and defend the financial interests and statutory schemes of its proprietary investors,

then who is representing our interests?

Who do we, the people, turn to to defend and protect our interests and investments?

See also:

The U.S. Constitution, Article 1 § 8, Clause 4. The Congress shall have Power * * * To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States - NATURALIZATION AND CITIZENSHIP, and

A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates, 1774 - 1875

Is "legislator" doublespeak for "broker"?

Are the children of our nation born free? Or, have Democrat and Republican Legislators brokered them into debt servitude to an oligarchy of global bankers and investors?

http://www.cspan.org/

June 23, 2010 - 1:15

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/29 ... hr 3:00 -

Canadian Rob Menard Explains "REMITTANCE"

At http://www.answers.com/ Remittance is defined in various Dictionaries and Encyclopedia.   From that website, on this date, the following text is how "remittance" is defined.   As you watch Menard's video, keep in mind that the billing agency may never fully disclose that to 'remove an obligation' there are other lawful choices.   I have embolden in blue (and it shows in purple) those choices.

Investment:  The process of sending money to remove an obligation. This is most often done through an electronic network, wire transfer or mail. The term also refers to the amount of money being sent to remove the obligation.

Investopedia Says:

When a person sends a check to the government to pay for a tax bill, the check is remittance to remove the tax obligation. If you were to send money to a friend in Europe through a wire-transfer service, the sum of the payment is the remittance.

Banking:  1. Payment toward satisfaction of a debt, whether in cash or cash equivalents, such as checks, drafts, and other negotiable instruments.

2. Payment on an installment loan or open-end credit account, forwarded through the mail to a Lock Box along with a remittance document, a machine readable billing document encoded with the customer's account number, and the amount due, plus any late charges, if the loan payment is delinquent.

3. Proceeds from a check submitted to another bank for Collection.

Law Encylcopedia:  Money sent from one individual to another in the form of cash, check, or some other manner.

Financial statements sent by a creditor to a debtor frequently refer to the process of submitting a monthly remittance.

See The World Freeman Society for common sense tips as to how you can demand 'honest services' from your government and its employees.  

Anything less than 'honest service' is unethical and a breach of fiduciary duty on their part (and ours).

WHAT IS "INTEGRITY"?

"What's wrong with this picture?"

How is it that a "federal judge" would determine "that Hispanics were being treated unfairly"  and allow them "to flip the lever six times for one (presumably Democrat or Republican Party) candidate", while Minor Party and Independent Candidate Constitutional Lawsuits are Pending in 21 States just to obtain ballot access?

What can be done? 

Voters in Fremont, Nebraska found a solution.  They put the illegal immigration issue on their ballot.

World Economies: The Next Step

Here's a spoof on the truth of the matter:

So what is the next step?

Consider this April 19, 1937 article about how bonds are monetized.

Then watch Dominique Strauss-Kahn as he describes IMF plans to monetize "bonds" in IMF currency to attendees at the National Press Club on April 16, 2009.   This segment is at +/- 00:33:00 of the video.

"TERRORISM": Who benefits?

How is it that employees of the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue can make terroristic threats on their employers (i.e., Pennsylvania property owners) with impunity?

Have you ever thought about why dis-ease has become so prevelant in our united states?

Do you know how the FBI defines Organized Crime, Criminal Enterprise and Racketeering?

How do you respond to threats?

How do you suppose those who have been benefiting from your belief in their fear (False Evidence Appearing Real) tactics will respond when they realize that you know their name and where to find them?

What will be their individual and collective "defense mechanism"?

What will be yours?

Dictionary definition: Defense Mechanism

1.  Biology. A physiological reaction of an organism used in self-protection, as against infection.

2.  Psychology. Any of various usually unconscious mental processes, including denial, projection, rationalization, and repression, that protect the ego from shame, anxiety, conflict, loss of self-esteem, or other unacceptable feelings or thoughts.

Do you believe "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's GOD" to which you're entitled by the "Declaration of Independence" are there for your benefit?

Do you feel good about your self?

Do you feel good about others?

Are you able - and willing - to meet the demands of life?

What will you choose to do? 

How will you choose to use the talent(s) with which you were endowed?

Join with The Articles of Freedom Liberty Coalition?

Volunteer to Preserve the American Dream?

Where there is no guidance the people fall, But in abundance of counselors there is victory.

ARTICLES OF FREEDOM

CONSTITUTIONALLY AUTHORIZED CENSUS TAKING

The SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; PONZI, TONTINE or LAWFUL INVESTMENT?

In 1932 school aged Americans learned about "The Magic Scrap of Paper" and their responsibilities as "stockholders" in what they perceived to be their lawful, constitutionally defined, Government. 

However, since 1932 much has changed.  "Lawful Money" is no longer lawful, and since 1994 the Social Security Administration has been operating as a wholly independent agency. 

So, what type of financial system had Democrat and Republican representatives during President Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration given the American people? 

A Ponzi system?

A Tontine system?

A system of lawful investments?

In the April 19, 1937 issue of The Scranton Times (archives, page 16) was the following article that explains the issuance of "bonds":

FEDERAL RESERVE HIT IN TALK BY LAMNECK

Washington, April 19 - Representative Lamneck (D Ohio) told the house today the federal reserve system is committing legally "the greatest burglary in history."

Critizing the system in the midst of a plea that the budget be balanced to avert "calamity," the Ohioan said that for a $300 investment a bank could get a $30,000 return."

If a burglar had a license to steal, he said, "he would at least have to carry away his loot. The federal reserve system has its loot brought to it."Lamneck said this was a procedure for a "steal" authorized by congress.

The treasury asks bids for several million dollars worth of bonds. A banker says he will take a million dollars worth and credits the treasury on his books with a million dollars.

Then he deposits the bonds with a federal reserve agent as collateral security for a million dollars in federal reserve notes and agrees to pay the cost of printing the currency - about $300.

He now has a million dollars in currency to balance the million dollar deposit he credited to the treasury.

He still owns the bonds and can collect the interest, about $20,000 a year on an investment of $300.

Further, in April 2009, speaking before the National Press Club in Washington D.C., here's what Dominique Strauss-Kahn said as he spoke on behalf of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).  In his talk, Mr. Strauss-Kahn responded to questions from the audience.  Of particular interest to all Americans (in my opinion) is his offer, just past the 33 minute point of his talk, " . . . OF BONDS WHICH WILL BE BONDS IN THE IMF CURRENCY . . . .

If you take the time to watch Dominique Strauss-Kahn's entire 'question and answer' session (from about the 30 minute point on) you may begin to understand why, in 1782, under the Articles of Confederation, Pennsylvania legislators promulgated "an ACT to prevent the erecting any new and independent state within the limits of this commonwealth".

What do you think?

Has the United States been re-venued into 'the crown's' feudalistic system of governance by an oligarchy of plutocrats using Ponzi and Tontine investment schemes?

If it has, is this "Ok" with you?  Is this what you want for your descendents?

It's up to every American to decide on an honorable method of investing in the future of our nation and to make the necessary changes as they are willing and able.