MAYORS AGAINST ILLEGAL GUNS (MAIG)

The following is a Letter to the Editor in response to a 'Guest Commentary' - "Mayors Against (Illegal) Guns" by Carbondale Mayor Justin Taylor. Here's how that commentary appeared in the Opinion section of the Carbondale News on 9-23-2009.

To the Editor;

Who gave Mayor Taylor the jurisdictional authority to "assume" that "(A)nyone who continues to oppose" his "membership in the "Mayors Against Illegal Guns" . . . is in favor of illegal guns"?

If Mayor Taylor supports "all Second Amendment rights provided to law-abiding citizens," what has persuaded him to deny First Amendment Rights (inclusive of "redress") to those same "law-abiding citizens"? Did not Mayor Taylor take the correct oath of office? The one provided in the Constitution of Pennsylvania; Article VI, Section 3?

And, if he did take the correct oath, why (by his own words) does he appear to be seditiously colluding with other mayors to overthrow the underpinnings of our "guaranteed" constitutional (U.S. Constitution Article 4, Section 4) "republic"?

In the CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA, under Article I, DECLARATION OF RIGHTS it states;

"That the general, great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and unalterably established, WE DECLARE THAT - . . . The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned." (Article I, Section 21.)

So why is Mayor Taylor telling the people that he opposes "federal legislation that would override existing state laws . . . ", yet be in favor illegal gun laws; the illegality of which is determined by questions on a federal form that were promulgated by federal mandates and NOT supporting the full intent of the law as "unalterably established" in Article 1, Section 21 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania; the Constitution for which he is ASSUMED to have pledged his oath of office?

* * * * * * * * * * * *

See also WHERE HAS THE CORPORATE UNITED STATES HIDDEN ITS STATE'S SECRET?

The people of Carbondale, and those who are in positions of authority in all municipal and quasi-municipal jurisdictions in Lackawanna County, have a "Right to Know" that the "Clerk of the Courts" for Lackawanna County is in New York.

If the people who litigate, adjudicate and govern in Lackawanna County know that they are willfully participating in seditious, or criminal activities, why haven't they been investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and prosecuted by the Department of Justice (DOJ)?

What is prohibiting full disclosure of the adhesive and unconscionable nature of the the "tax" contracts by which people have had their "corporeal" and "incorporeal" property seized for noncompliance and benign "redress"?

How is it that men like Carbondale Mayor Justin Taylor will choose to serve a system of governance that appears to be based on fraud?

Is it the fictional NGO "ACORN" or is it prominent legislative and judicial family members who influence a matrix of corruption in Pa government?

Here's another way of looking at Senator Casey's support of ACORN and his influence in the matrix of judicial corruption in Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania. (Updated 10/19/2009)

Click on http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202423950217 to link to the August 21, 2008 Pa. Courts Pursuing Conciliation for Foreclosures post by Amaris Elliott-Engel at Pennsylvania Law Weekly to see how the legislative Casey and judicial Munley families continue to promulgate influence and legislation in order to adjudicate protections and defenses for owners of global banks and the controversial Non-Governmental Organization, ACORN.

In Lackawanna County, since - at least - the time Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “New Deal”, it seems to have been a common practice for these prominent families (i.e., the legislative Casey and the judicial Munley) to collude in seditious activities that broker the men and women of our nation into Thirteenth Amendment 're-constructed' statutory “servitude” to a corporate jurisdiction. Their backroom dealings have been without “full disclosure” of the adhesive and unconscionable natures of what I consider to be treasonous contracts that have allowed a statutory governance to be erected within the parameters of our intended form of government.

One example of how this contractual 'revenuing' (no pun intended) into a foreign corporate jurisdiction is being done, had been previously posted. In that example I ask: "BONDS": Are they UNCONSCIONABLE, IN VIOLATION of RICO STATUTES, or TREASON? and give an example of how we, American men and women who believe our selves to be free, have been "ceded" by legislative brokers into a type of corporate feudalism under what appears to be the same "Crown" business-as-usual enterprise system of governance that colonized the "new world" in the 17th Century on behalf of its investors.

So, again I bring your attention to Harrisburg Bureau Chief, Robert Swift’s December 3, 2008 article wherein he quotes Pennsylvania Majority Leader Todd Eachus, D-116 as saying; “Integrity is built in the DNA of the Casey family” and ask you, the reader to look past the wordsmiths’ rhetoric and decide for your self whether “integrity” can be for good or for evil.

Check out the facts and become an informed electorate.

AGENDA 21, ECOSYSTEMS, HEALTH-CARE and the INSURANCE INDUSTRY

Is there a connection between the U.N.'s AGENDA 21 programmes and projects for ECOSYSTEMS, "PUBLIC OPTION" HEALTH-CARE, and INSURANCE INDUSTRY "stakeholders"?

In this age of "corporate governance" where ALL law is contingent on what we, the people, allow via our contract with our representatives to this government I present to you the information we're being given to understand the connections between the United Nation's AGENDA 21 'programmes and projects' for ECOSYSTEMS, "PUBLIC OPTION" HEALTH-CARE and INSURANCE INDUSTRY "stakeholders".

"FULL disclosure" MUST be demanded of our legislators! Help them to perform their tasks and duties with the integrity you expect from them.

Consider the following and share your thoughts with your legislators. Help them to frame their questions to lobbyists who are pushing a global agenda for an oligarchy of plutocrats.

"Stakeholder" "Ownership and sustainability" is being encouraged by the World Health Organization through:

Strategic Planning and Innovation - " . . . SPI aims to increase combined coverage of services for TB, HIV/AIDS and malaria. It encourages ownership and sustainability of these services, and strives to help countries produce practical methods to deliver prevention and care for the three diseases."


And,

Ecosystems and health - There is growing concern amongst many natural scientists that human interventions are altering the capacity of ecosystems to provide their goods (e.g. freshwater, food, pharmaceutical products, etc) and services (e.g. purification of air, water, soil, sequestration of pollutants, etc).And, "special interest" lobbyist's for Wall Street investors and bankers are now gearing up to "securitize" "life settlement" policies "by packaging hundreds or thousands together into bonds. They will then resell those bonds to investors, like big pension funds, who will receive the payouts when people with the insurance die. The earlier the policyholder dies, the bigger the return . . . " (The rest of the article is below: Wall St. now investing in death.)

Consider how the bankers "plan to buy "life settlements," . . . "securitize" these policies, . . . (and) by packaging hundreds or thousands together into bonds . . . (t)hey will then resell those bonds to investors, . . . who will receive the payouts when people with the insurance die. . . . The earlier the policyholder dies, the bigger the return . . . " as you watch IMF Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn speak on new flexible lending programs - and other efforts - the International Monetary Fund (IMF) will use to help countries through the recession. Hear Mr. Strauss-Kahn for your self as he responded to questions from the audience. Pay particular attention to Strauss-Kahn's offer ". . . OF BONDS WHICH WILL BE BONDS IN THE IMF CURRENCY . . ." Strauss-Kahn's statements are just past the 33 minute point of his April 2009 talk before the National Press Club in Washington, DC.

If we, the people, believe what we are told - that We, the people, are the government - and understand how these seditious activities are usurping our authority to govern our selves, then all members of Congress and our state legislators require our oversight.

Let your representative know what you know so that he (also she) will know that you know that he knows!

Quit giving your 'law-makers' "wiggle-room" to pass treasonous "bills of attainder" for a foreign oligarchy that mandates you either willingly participate in their constructive fraud or be duly convicted of their statutory crime(s) and be jailed!

In the article (below) "Health care top issue as Congress returns" are some of the issues before Congress as they craft a comprehensive health care plan. Included in that article are some concerns that have been voiced by Catholic bishops.

And, because ALL LAW IS CONTRACTUAL under the 13th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, if you - a "U.S. citizen" - choose not to 'voluntarily' comply with federally legislated mandates for your health care (unless you speak-up NOW) you may be 'duly convicted of a crime'.

So, here's one more message on healthcare.

Congress requires our oversight.

Congressmen (like Mike Rogers) need our support.

So: What's the next step for a free people?

- Reaffirm your allegiance to the organic principles of our constitutional republic.

- Become involved in the October 10, 2009 election process to elect delegates to the November 9 - 22 Continental Congress of 2009.

- Learn more about the Continental Congress 2009 at http://www.cc2009.us/about-cc2009.