We all know that precedence for obtaining government
identification, whether it’s a passport, driver’s license or “photo”, has
‘always’ included the submission of a completed application and monetary
consideration (i.e., “payment”) to the issuing authority. Therefore, I will
attempt to make known my concerns from three perspectives; the lawful, the legal
and the prophetic, within the parameters of your historical fiduciary duties as
representatives to the people of our nation and the essential characteristics of
indenture contracts; adhesion and unconscionable. But, first, I preface what I
am about to say with the well known, yet to be rebutted, fundamental point of
reference upon which I present lawful, legal and prophetic opposition to the
federal Real ID Act of 2005, or any other such mandated identification that may
be promulgated.
PREFACERecent documentaries
have revealed that the cost to the owners of the Federal Reserve (those who
print the American people’s ‘units of exchange’, i.e., “dollars” or “money”) is
approximately $.042 (
now $.09) to print a "bill" of any denomination, therefore, when a
worker receives $10.00 for his/her labor the owners of the Federal Reserve
profit approximately $9.958 ($9.91) just for printing that “bill”. Another +/- $2.00
(20%) Federal Tax is then demanded by agents of the IRS on behalf of those who
print the money. As I calculate it, with the present use of these "bills", for
each $10.00 of a working man's labor his DEBT to the owners of the Federal
Reserve (those who print the money) is approximately $11.96 ($11.91). Should a laborer
acquiesce by chip or plastic card (i.e., a likely future use of any “Real
[government issued] ID”) to a totally cashless economy, the profits to the
owners of the Federal Reserve will increase exponentially! Without consideration
for other forms of taxation and interest on loans and mortgages, American men
and women will profit those who oversee the manufacturing of the card or chip
they must use; approximately $12.00 for every $10.00 of a man's labor! In fact,
when you take the time to do the math, you will see that Governor Rendell’s
$2.00 per hour increase in the “minimum wage” of Pennsylvanians still kept the
affected ‘wage earner’ at “minimum wage” and essentially increased the revenues
of the owners of the Federal Reserve (at least) $1.92 ($1.90) per hour, per the tens of
thousands of recipients!
Today the people of our nation are at a
threshold. Will you, our elected representatives who took an oath to support,
obey and defend with fidelity the Pennsylvania and U.S. Constitutions of a
“republic” with a democratic process, support, obey and defend with fidelity
that Form of government to which you pledge your allegiance and swore your oath;
or, Will you, willingly volunteer the people of your nation into a “feudal” form
of governance with a communistic “party” process wherein the ‘American dream’
will be based on an optimal form of voluntary indebted servitude to a (relative)
‘handful of men’ who print the money and, at their whim, can pull the proverbial
“plug” on an ATM or erase a name from a database? (On a personal note, I can’t
help but to suspect that the descendents of our European ancestors who remained
in Europe and have a sense of history are laughing at our
naivety.)
HISTORYAccording to
"http://findlaw.com" - "All that is necessary for most contracts to be legally
valid are the following two elements:
- All parties are in agreement
(after an offer has been made by one party and accepted by the other).
-
Something of value has been exchanged, such as cash, services, or goods (or a
promise to exchange such an item) for something else of value.
"
Therefore, given the binding nature of our freewill participation in
contracts, it is disingenuous to believe that the "Charters" (i.e., the
‘corporate contracts’) that were granted to "new world" colonizers (including
"William Penn, Esquire, and his heirs and assigns" in 1681 by Charles the
Second, Chancellor Heneage, Lord Finch, and their heirs and successors) somehow
(miraculously) disappeared in 1776 by a few (relatively speaking) signatures on
a “Declaration of Independence”. Or, in 1791 with the ratification of the “Bill
of Rights”, i.e., the first 10 Amendments to the U.S.
Constitution.
Indeed, Esquire Penn's obligations to his corporate feudal
masters most likely remained in tact and it was simply a matter of
business-as-usual for European investors to commission their 'privy councilors'
to promulgate the contract law(s) that would continue to govern their global
commerce to this day. No doubt that this was, and continues to be, easily done
with the blessings of the people who have not yet recognized that their
venerated Constitution was written in 'doublespeak'! Since the birth of our
nation platitudes like "emancipation", "reconstruction", "reorganization", “war
on terror”, etc. have toyed with our emotions and left us vulnerable to
proverbial “ravaging wolves in sheep’s clothing”. Have we forgotten that
"councilors" still promulgate the laws upon which the courts must act? And that
the “privy councilors” became the “Board of Trade and Plantations”? What (now)
are they called in the global marketplace? Are they now members of the World
Trade Organization (WTO) who are using members of the United States Congress as
their brokers to implement the documentation (i.e., the Real ID) that will give
them absolute ownership of our physical and intellectual
properties?
THE LAWFULAccording to
www.FindLaw.com 'the freedom of contract' is "a power or right to contract and
freely determine the provisions of contracts without arbitrary or unreasonable
legal restrictions esp. as guaranteed under the contract clause of Article I,
Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution". The Congress of these united States,
however, had the power to Amend this Constitution: And they
did!
THE LEGALWith the 13th and 14th
Amendments to the original, duly ratified U.S. Constitution of 1791, preparatory
steps were taken by Congress to, in a business-as-usual manner, re-venue into
the system of government with which they were most comfortable ALL Americans who
were willing to alienate (or lien) themselves from their "unalienable Rights"
into a statutory form of feudalism. In 1865 the 13th Amendment was crafted with
words that allow for 'voluntary servitude' and "punishment for crime whereof the
party shall have been duly convicted". Furthermore, Congress gave themselves the
"power to enforce this article (the 13th Amendment; i.e., voluntary servitude)
by appropriate legislation". The next step in this re-venuing scheme came in
1868. Complimentary with feudalistic governance and an (oligarchic) party
process, Democrat and Republican members of Congress gave to themselves
jurisdiction over the descendants of those Americans who voluntarily "ceded"
themselves into statutory servitude in a manner consistent with the laws enacted
to facilitate an economy based on the principles of “debenture”. With the
assistance of the Democrat and Republican members of Congress, a silent
(plutocratic) coup incrementally continued in 1913 with the passage of the
Federal Reserve Act and the 16th and 17th Amendments, in 1933 with Roosevelt's
monetary 'reorganization' (a “New Deal” for his plutocratic cronies), in 1964
with the Civil Rights Act, then with the Coinage Act of 1965 whereby, (according
to wikipedia) constitutionally mandated silver was eliminated from the
circulating dimes and quarter dollars, and diminished in the half dollar. In
addition to the above provisions, for which it is best known, the act:
-
Made all coins and currency of the United States (including certain bank issues)
a legal tender. This has been taken to reverse the demonetisation of the Trade
Dollar, and
- Gave the Secretary (of the Treasury) broad discretion to
enter into contracts to assure an adequate supply of clad coins, without regard
to public procurement laws.
Fortunately, in Pennsylvania, the crafters of
the Pennsylvania Constitution had the foresight to provide remedy to those men
and women who would become cognizant of this blatant “bait and switch” fraud and
in Article 1, Section 17 provided that; "No ex post facto law, nor any law
impairing the obligation of contracts, or making irrevocable any grant of
special privileges or immunities, shall be passed."
THE
PROPHETICProphecy, when it comes to pass, is nothing more than
the consequences of predictable societal behaviors.
The prophecy found in
Rev. 13:16-17 seems consistent with the mandated Real ID AND with the
anticipated consequences of the normal behaviors of a statutorily oppressed
people who may be “fearful, and unbelieving” (Rev. 21:8).
"
And he
causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a
mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads (i.e., perhaps a ‘mind set’ in
the ‘executive functioning’ area of one’s brain?): And that no man might buy or
sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his
name"
BUT, (if I’m correct in my assessment)
there’s another side of this prophecy. It’s found in Rev.
18:11–13:
“
And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over
her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more: The merchandise of gold, and
silver, and precious stones, . . . and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and
sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.”
Who knows! It may be that all that is needed is a leader with access that
encourages and sustains the “courage” of others to come out of an economic
bondage of their own making. After all, one would think that a people who have
been praying “Thy kingdom come” for 2000 years and have the ability to “bind”
and “loose” at will would be more than willing to follow such a leader and
collectively shake off their
oppressors.
CONCLUSIONIn my opinion, the
promulgation of the Real ID Act of 2005 is a mere formality to give credible
authority to a parallel system of feudal governance that IF ALLOWED will
authorize the final death blow to our (previously guaranteed) constitutional
republic, and usher in that which “Christians” have feared for two millennia.
Truly, I reiterate what I said previously;
Today the people of our nation
are at a threshold. Will you, our elected representatives who took an oath to
support, obey and defend with fidelity the Pennsylvania and U.S. Constitutions
of a “republic” with a democratic process, support, obey and defend with
fidelity that Form of government to which you pledge your allegiance and swore
your oath; or, Will you, willingly volunteer the people of your nation into a
“feudal” form of governance with a communistic “party” process wherein the
‘American dream’ will be based on an optimal form of voluntary indebted
servitude to a (relative) ‘handful of men’ who print the money and, at their
whim, can pull the proverbial “plug” on an ATM or erase a name from a
database?
I can only quote scripture, speak from the objective lessons of
History, and share my personal experience with the municipal magistrate’s “prize
court”. (Yes, “prize court”. Look it up in the Encyclopedia
Britannica.)
My experience* speaks specifically to the issues pertinent
to this testimony in opposition to government issued ID that is mandated to be
purchased with debt based money; whether it’s this “Real ID” issue currently
before the Pennsylvania legislature or any other! Therefore, it is my desire
that whatever the members of the Pennsylvania legislature decide to do that they
include provisions that will “support, obey and defend” the Constitutional
protections provided for men and women, like my self, who choose NOT to apply
for commercial benefits and privileges that must be paid for with a debt-based
currency, a “legal” fiat “tender” that alienates us from our “unalienable
Rights” and causes many to suffer undue ‘pains and penalties’ from court
officers who choose to gain political favor by sustaining, what amounts to,
treasonous Bills of Attainder.
My personal evaluation of the lawful,
legal and prophetic characteristics of the proposed mandated legislation has
been from the vantage of a 1960’s era (pre Treasury Department “mercenary”) Navy
veteran who took an oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution. I am a
woman who believes the "self evident truth" that she "resides" in her "freehold"
(i.e., her "self"/”body” whose name is the “title” that “identifies” her) until
she returns (at death) to her "domicile" wherein she must give an account to her
“Creator”. With that said, ANY application that I would make for a “benefit” and
“privilege” with debt based money, i.e., a “unit of exchange” that essentially
enslaves the labors of my future generations to the future generations of the
mere men who print that money, would violate my Sovereign's Law against
"coveting" that “benefit” or “privilege”, and "stealing" to get it! Such are the
characteristics and subsequent consequences of the indenture contracts that have
been legislated by Democrat and Republican Congressional and State legislators
since the Civil War. Clearly, we, the American people have been legislated into
a form of mandated statutory feudalism by systemic adhesion and unconscionable
contracts with those who print the U.S. currency, our mandated unit of exchange.
Our ‘legal tender’ has been monopolized by a global oligarchy of plutocrats
whose ultimate goal appears to be the megalomaniacal occupation and distribution
of the labors and produce of our global resources; human and otherwise. The
councilors who craft and mandate legislation such as the Real ID without which
we, the people, are presumed to have no identity and, therefore, no standing in
law are the true "terrorist" from whom we, the people, need your legislated
defenses and protection. So, I ask: Will you ‘cast out the moneychangers’ and
legislate for the people those defenses and protections necessary for us to live
our lives with the integrity expected of us by our “Creator”; i.e., the
Sovereign to whom we must all (eventually) bow our knee and give an
account?
*
MY EXPERIENCETHE REVERSE SIDE OF
THE
GEORGIA AND NEVADA LICENSES TELL THE STORY AS TO WHY I STOPPED PURCHASING
LICENSES. THEY CERTAINLY DID NOT LICENSE ME TO OPERATE A TOYOTA CAMRY THAT SEATS
5. THE PURCHASE OF LICENSE REQUIRED THAT I VIOLATE MY CONSCIOUS AND LIE THAT I
AM ENGAGED IN 'INTERSTATE COMMERCE'.
KNOWING THAT I CANNOT 'DRIVE' A
COMMERCIALLY REGISTERED VEHICLE UNLESS I HAVE A COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE
I
CHOSE TO KEEP THE LAW AS I UNDERSTOOD IT AND USE 'THE LAW OF THE FLAG' IN MY
TRAVELS.
THE SUBSEQUENT SEIZURE OF WHAT I PERCEIVED TO BE MY PROPERTY AND
THE CAPTURE OF A LAWFUL U.S. FLAG SUGGESTS THAT WE HAVE A 'FOREIGN OCCUPYING
POWER' IN CONTROL OF OUR NATION’S COURTS. THE POWER APPEARS TO BE THAT OF
COMMERCE, AND OUR NATION (IT APPEARS) IS BEING GOVERNED BY AN INTERNATIONAL
OLIGARCHY OF PLUTOCRATS WHO MAKE THE LAWS UPON WHICH THE COURTS MUST
ACT.
I BROUGHT MY GRIEVANCE ON APPEAL AS A "PETITION FOR REVIEW" OF THIS
SUBSTANTIVE CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER THAT INVOLVES ISSUES OF “JURISDICTION”,
“TITLE” AND “OWNERSHIP”, AND, ON THE COMMERCIAL SIDE; “AGENCY”, “IDENTITY” AND
“OWNERSHIP”.
HERE
IS THE ORIGINAL PETITION FOR REVIEW THAT WAS BROUGHT BEFORE THE LACKAWANNA COURT
OF COMMON PLEAS AND THE SUPERIOR COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT.
FEEL AT LIBERTY
TO REVIEW THE BLOGS AND THE COURT DOCKETS.
